| name | one-on-one-prep |
| description | Deep-dive preparation for 1:1 meetings with direct reports. Surfaces recent work, wins, friction, wellbeing signals, and development goal progress, anchored in the org's performance framework, organizational values, and management best practices. Produces a prep sheet with suggested conversation topics, not a script. |
1:1 Prep
Great 1:1s live at the intersection of performance and care. Development keeps growth alive. Wellbeing makes sure the person behind the work is seen. Both matter every time.
Deep-dive preparation for 1:1 meetings with a specific direct report, anchored in the org's performance framework (from manager-context/performance-framework.md) and organizational values.
When to Use
- Before any 1:1 meeting with a direct report
- When the manager says "prep my 1:1 with [name]", "what should I discuss with [name]"
- Can be invoked with just a name, the skill finds the relevant context
Instructions
If any MCP connector is unavailable, follow the connector unavailability protocol in references/operating-principles.md.
1. Identify the Team Member
If a name is provided, match it against manager-context/team/ profiles.
If no name is specified, check the calendar for the next upcoming 1:1 meeting and identify the attendee.
If ambiguous:
Which team member? Your upcoming 1:1s are:
- [Name], [day] at [time]
- [Name], [day] at [time]
Load the team member's profile from manager-context/team/[name].md for:
- Their role, current projects, communication style
- Goals location (Notion page, Drive doc)
- Last review date and development areas
- Last 1:1 date and open items
If no profile exists:
⚠️ No profile found for [name]. Run /setup to build team context, or I'll work with what I can find from sources directly.
2. Surface Recent Work & Wins
Slack (last 7-14 days):
- Messages posted by this person in team/project channels
- Threads they've been active in
- Any shoutouts or recognition they received (search for their name + positive signals like "great", "shipped", "amazing", "thanks")
- Features shipped, PRs merged, deliverables completed (visible in public channels)
Google Drive:
- Documents they've recently created or edited
- Especially docs related to their projects or deliverables
Notion:
- Pages they've authored or updated recently
- Project status updates they've contributed to
Compile into a "recent activity" summary.
3. Detect Friction or Concerns
Look for signals (NOT diagnoses, signals for the manager to explore):
Slack:
- Repeated blockers or unanswered questions
- Messages where they expressed frustration or confusion
- Decreased activity compared to usual patterns (if baseline is known)
- Long threads where they're asking for help without clear resolution
Calendar:
- Cancelled or rescheduled 1:1s
- Unusually heavy or light meeting load
Important: Frame these as conversation starters, not assessments:
💡 Potential topics to explore (signals, not conclusions):
- [Name] asked about [topic] in #channel 3 times this week without a clear resolution, might be a blocker worth discussing
- [Name]'s activity in #project-channel has been lower than usual, could be fine, but worth checking in
4. Values & Wellbeing Check
Scan for signals related to the organization's values (from manager-context/values.md). These give the manager conversation threads beyond just goals and deliverables.
If no values are configured, focus on these universal management dimensions:
Wellbeing & Energy:
- Late-night or weekend Slack activity (potential overwork)
- Calendar density (back-to-back days, no focus time)
- Tone in recent messages: enthusiasm vs. fatigue (soft signal only)
- Have they taken time off recently?
Team Connection & Collaboration:
- Are they collaborating across the team, or working in isolation?
- Engagement in team channels (social, celebrations)
- Have they helped or unblocked teammates recently?
Communication & Transparency:
- Are they sharing context, asking for feedback, raising issues openly?
- Any threads where they seemed hesitant to speak up?
Resourcefulness & Problem-Solving:
- Evidence of creative problem-solving, unblocking themselves, learning new things
Ownership & Initiative:
- Volunteering for stretch work, proposing ideas, taking initiative
- Driving things to completion vs. waiting for direction
If organizational values are configured, map these dimensions to the specific values and use value names in the output.
Compile into a brief values snapshot (not a scorecard, conversation prompts):
Values Snapshot:
- [Value/Dimension 1]: [observation or "no signal"]
- [Value/Dimension 2]: [observation or "no signal"]
...
Only include values/dimensions where there's a meaningful signal. Don't force all of them every time.
5. Check Development Goals
Using the goals location from the team member's profile:
Notion:
- Pull their current goals and development areas
- Check when goals were last updated
- Look for any self-assessment or progress notes
Google Drive:
- Pull the 1:1 document for this person
- Check the most recent entries for open action items and commitments
Reference the org's performance framework dimensions (from manager-context/performance-framework.md). Use the org's dimension names and sub-dimensions when checking goal progress. If this file doesn't exist, ask the manager to run /setup first.
See the "Evidence Gathering Guidelines" section in references/performance-framework.md for what to look for per dimension type:
- Results/delivery dimensions: goal completion, shipped work, quality feedback, business outcomes
- Growth/development dimensions: learning activities, new skills applied, scope expansion, behavioural changes
- Collaboration/leadership dimensions: cross-team activity, mentoring, influence in discussions
📋 Development Goal Status:
- Goal 1: "[goal text]", [status: on track / needs attention / no update since [date]]
- Goal 2: "[goal text]", [status]
- Development area: "[area]", [any evidence of progress or attention]
⏰ Last goal update: [date], [flag if >6 weeks old]
6. Pull Previous 1:1 Notes
Search for the last 1:1 document/notes:
Google Drive: Search "[name] 1:1", "one on one [name]"
Extract:
- Open action items (for both manager and team member)
- Topics that were "parked" for follow-up
- Development commitments made
📝 From last 1:1 ([date]):
Open items:
- [ ] [Manager] to [action], [status: done/pending/unknown]
- [ ] [Team member] to [action], [status: done/pending/unknown]
Parked topics: [if any]
7. Produce the Prep Sheet
Read references/output-template.md for the full output template structure.
8. Sub-Agent Review
Spawn a sub-agent to review the prep sheet with fresh eyes. The reviewer should:
- Check that wellbeing signals are framed as conversation starters, not assessments or diagnoses.
- Check that the values snapshot only includes values with meaningful signals, not forcing all values every time.
- Verify that wins lead the document and the tone is constructive, not surveillance-like.
- Flag any phrasing that crosses from observation ("posted after 22:00 three times") into interpretation ("seems burned out").
- Check that evidence gaps are noted where data is thin, rather than padded with weak signals.
Incorporate the reviewer's feedback before presenting the final prep sheet.
9. Present and Offer Follow-Up
Here's your prep for your 1:1 with [name]. Anything you'd like me to dig deeper on?
Important Notes
Read references/operating-principles.md for shared operating principles (data scope, DM flagging, signals vs diagnoses, connector unavailability).
Additional notes specific to this skill:
- Wins first. Always lead with recognition opportunities. This sets the tone.
- Goals are the backbone. If goals are missing or stale, flag it prominently. Great 1:1s keep development goals alive.
- Framework + values alignment. Suggested questions should map to the org's performance framework dimensions or organizational values. Don't force all values every time, only surface values where there's a real signal.
- Values are conversation threads, not checklists. The values snapshot helps managers notice things beyond deliverables. A 1:1 that only covers goals misses the human. A 1:1 that only covers feelings misses the growth. Both.
- Don't script the conversation. Provide prompts and context, not a talk track.
