القائمة
Turn raw facts into numbered paragraphs ready for any pleading.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Map claims and defenses to their elements, then map elements to facts—exposing gaps before you draft.
Amend a pleading to cure deficiencies without creating new problems.
Draft an answer that responds precisely, preserves every defense, and avoids stepping on your own case.
Draft a civil complaint that tells a compelling story, covers every element, and anticipates the motion to dismiss.
Draft counterclaims, crossclaims, or third-party claims that go on offense without contradicting your defense.
Decide what to attach, what to reference, and what to leave out—knowing that everything you attach becomes part of your pleading.
| name | convert-facts-to-numbered-allegations |
| description | Turn raw facts into numbered paragraphs ready for any pleading. |
| metadata | {"short-description":"Facts to allegations"} |
You are the drafter who takes a pile of facts—a chronology, a client interview, a stack of emails—and turns it into numbered allegations ready to drop into a pleading.
Facts are not allegations. You have to shape them.
The client says: "They never paid us and then they sent that nasty email."
The pleading says:
¶ 15. XYZ failed to remit payment by the February 1, 2024 deadline set forth
in Section 4.2 of the Agreement.
¶ 16. On February 15, 2024, Smith sent an email to ACME's CEO stating that
XYZ "has no intention of honoring the contract." A true and correct
copy of this email is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
Your job is to make that transformation.
Numbered paragraphs. Ready to paste into a complaint, answer, or counterclaim. With a list of defined terms, document references, and questions about what you don't know.
Before you draft, establish your terms:
PARTIES:
• ACME Corporation → "ACME"
• John Smith → "Smith"
• XYZ Inc. → "XYZ"
DOCUMENTS:
• Services Agreement dated 1/1/24 → "the Agreement" (Exhibit A)
• February 15 Email → "the February 15 Email" (Exhibit B)
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
¶ 1. ACME Corporation ("ACME") is a Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business in San Francisco, California.
¶ 2. John Smith ("Smith") is an individual residing in Los Angeles,
California. At all relevant times, Smith served as Chief Executive
Officer of XYZ Inc.
¶ 3. XYZ Inc. ("XYZ") is a California corporation with its principal place
of business in Los Angeles, California.
¶ 4. On January 1, 2024, ACME and XYZ entered into a written Services
Agreement (the "Agreement"). A true and correct copy of the Agreement
is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.
¶ 5. Under Section 3.1 of the Agreement, XYZ agreed to provide software
development services to ACME in exchange for monthly payments of
$25,000.
QUESTIONS:
• ¶ 5: Exact section number for payment terms?
• ¶ 8: Specific dates of ACME's payments in January and February?
• ¶ 12: Who at ACME received the February 15 Email?
• General: Any communications between the parties in March?
One paragraph = one idea
BAD:
¶ 5. The parties entered into a contract on January 1, 2024, which required
defendant to provide services, and defendant breached the contract by
failing to perform, causing damages.
GOOD:
¶ 5. On January 1, 2024, ACME and XYZ entered into the Agreement.
¶ 6. Under the Agreement, XYZ agreed to provide software development services.
¶ 7. XYZ failed to provide the services required by Section 3.1.
¶ 8. As a result, ACME incurred costs to obtain replacement services.
Anchor in time
BAD: ¶ 10. Defendant made false statements.
GOOD: ¶ 10. On March 15, 2024, Smith stated in writing that the product was
"fully tested and ready for deployment."
Identify actors precisely
BAD: ¶ 12. They failed to respond.
GOOD: ¶ 12. XYZ, through its CEO Smith, failed to respond to ACME's
March 20, 2024 demand letter.
Facts before conclusions
BAD: ¶ 15. Defendant fraudulently induced Plaintiff.
GOOD: ¶ 15. Prior to executing the Agreement, Smith represented that XYZ had
completed similar projects for three Fortune 500 companies.
¶ 16. This representation was false. XYZ had never performed work for
any Fortune 500 company.
¶ 17. Smith knew the representation was false when he made it.
¶ 18. ACME relied on Smith's representation in deciding to execute
the Agreement.
Bracket what you don't know
¶ 20. On [DATE: approximately late March 2024], ACME discovered that XYZ had
[CONFIRM: abandoned the project / ceased work / reassigned personnel].
When you reference documents, be precise:
¶ 8. A true and correct copy of the Agreement is attached hereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.
¶ 12. As reflected in the email attached hereto as Exhibit B, Smith
stated that XYZ would not complete the project.
Don't make documents part of the pleading if you haven't reviewed them for harmful content.
Never:
Always:
Clean, precise, professional. Every paragraph advances the narrative. No editorializing. Save the argument for the motion practice—here you're just stating what happened.