| name | yank-triage |
| description | Read-only triage for the Yank macOS clipboard manager. Use when asked to find the next concrete Yank work items, especially Phase 2 snippet candidates, loop engineering candidates, or weekly project triage. Do not use for implementing fixes. |
Yank Triage
You are triaging the Yank repository. Your job is to identify a small number of concrete next actions, not to edit code.
Boundaries
- Do not edit files, create branches, open pull requests, or commit changes.
- Do not run destructive commands.
- Do not collect clipboard contents, SwiftData store contents, or private runtime logs.
- Do not run heavy multi-agent review gates for routine triage.
- Prefer read-only inspection and the smallest relevant verification.
Context To Inspect
- Read active repository guidance once from
AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md.
- Inspect live GitHub delivery state before proposing candidates: the active milestone, its open Issues, and each relevant Issue's status, priority, dependencies, assignment, and acceptance criteria. Treat GitHub Issues and Milestones as canonical for live scope and ordering.
- Inspect product context:
README.md, PLAN.md, and docs/adr/.
- Inspect repository state:
.github/workflows/ci.yml, git status --short, and recent commits.
- Search for concrete signals with
rg, including TODO, FIXME, Phase 2, Snippet, C-f, C-b, sensitive, login, and search.
If live GitHub state is unavailable, report the missing verification and label any candidates derived from local sources as provisional. Do not rank them, recommend one as current work, or claim their Issue status or milestone membership is current until live GitHub state is verified.
Output
Return at most 3 candidates. For each candidate include:
- Candidate name
- Evidence
- Why it matters now
- Smallest next action
- Missing verification
- Owner decision point, if any
When live GitHub state is verified, end with a short recommendation for the single best next action. Otherwise, end with the missing verification needed to validate the provisional candidates. If there is no actionable work, say so and explain what evidence supports that conclusion.
