القائمة
Use when Greptile is unavailable or before requesting external review to assign a conservative 1-5 production-readiness score to a Gormes change from source evidence and validation results.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Implement one selected repo-scoped Gormes row with tests. Use when next-work says decision=build. Do not use for decision=plan, broad parity audits, or untracked feature ideas.
Shape source-backed Gormes progress rows. Use for decision=plan builder handoffs, row splitting, feature maps, or parity planning. Do not use when decision=build or for runtime code.
Route Gormes work to the smallest repo-local skill chain. Use before substantial planning/building/refactor work, when unsure which Gormes skill applies, or when creating/improving repo-local skills.
Build one selected Gormes behavior with red-green-refactor. Use when the row or reproduced bug defines a test target. Do not use after decision=plan or for broad planning.
Move one bounded cmd/gormes command domain out of root files toward root main.go only. Use when thinning cmd/gormes, burning down loose root files, preserving CLI behavior, or catching refactor regressions during cmd moves.
Use when an agent is unfamiliar with a Gormes code area, a change crosses package boundaries, or a refactor needs a source-backed module map before edits.
| name | gormes-review-scorecard |
| description | Use when Greptile is unavailable or before requesting external review to assign a conservative 1-5 production-readiness score to a Gormes change from source evidence and validation results. |
This is a local, conservative version of the Greptile-style 5/5 quality gate. It does not replace Greptile or CI; it tells the agent whether the work deserves external review yet.
gormes-greptile-loop or gormes-release.Start at 5. Subtract for evidence-backed problems:
| Deduction | Problem |
|---|---|
| -2 | failing required test/check, known runtime bug, data-loss/security risk |
| -1 | missing focused test for changed behavior |
| -1 | unclear user-visible contract or parity evidence |
| -1 | mixed concerns that should be split |
| -1 | weak validation notes or unverified manual claim |
| -1 | docs/progress/skill routing drift |
Minimum score is 1. Never award 5/5 with dirty uncommitted production code unless the review scope is explicitly local/uncommitted.
git status --short --branchgit diff --stat or git show --stat for committed work.go test ./internal/skills -count=1, go run ./cmd/progress validate, git diff --checkgo test ./... -count=1, go run ./cmd/progress validate, git diff --checkgormes-tdd-slicegormes-review-loop or gormes-greptile-loopgormes-progress-slicergormes-architecture-zoomoutGormes review scorecard
Scope: <diff/commit/PR>
Score: <n>/5
Evidence: <commands/files>
Deductions:
- <points>: <reason + exact evidence>
Required to reach 5/5:
1. <smallest next action + skill>