executing-plans
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
| name | executing-plans |
| description | Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints |
Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
Note: Tell your human partner that Superpowers works much better with access to subagents. The quality of its work will be significantly higher if run on a platform with subagent support (such as Claude Code or Codex). If subagents are available, use superpowers:subagent-driven-development instead of this skill.
Fallbacks for local project copies: If referenced workflow skills such as using-git-worktrees or finishing-a-development-branch are not available in the current environment, continue with the closest local equivalent instead of blocking. In this repository, that means: verify the current branch/worktree state yourself before editing, then finish by running the planned verification commands plus the local requesting-code-review and empirical-prompt-tuning completion flow. If the repository has no HEAD yet (for example, an initial uncommitted repo), do not block on commit-range review. Define the review scope as the current uncommitted target files, run a file-level static review against the plan/requirements, and report that the no-HEAD fallback path was used.
If branch or worktree creation is blocked by the sandbox, do not stall the task solely for that reason. Record that branch isolation could not be established in the current environment, avoid destructive git operations, and continue with focused file edits plus explicit verification.
?content=) and preserve them through normalization and tests rather than rebuilding URLs from pathname aloneFor each task:
After all tasks complete and verified:
HEAD, explicitly say that range-based review is unavailable, review the current uncommitted target files instead, and treat that as the completion-review checkpoint.STOP executing immediately when:
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Required workflow skills: