القائمة
Non-Claude agents only. Get an independent second opinion from Claude CLI on decisions with meaningful trade-offs.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
Respond to unreplied review comments on the current GitHub Pull Request. For each comment, either commit a fix, push, and reply with the commit hash, or reply with concrete rationale for keeping the code as-is. Does not approve or request changes.
日本語の技術文書・書籍原稿の文章規範。整形（一文一行、引用ブロック、脚注、コラム記法）、段落と論証の構成（パラグラフライティング）、論証の厳密さ（ツッコミどころの除去）、読み手の負荷の管理、視点と語り、演出の抑制、LLM っぽい空句の禁止、冗長の排除を定める。日本語で技術書の章、草稿、記事、解説文を書くとき、または推敲・リライトするときに使用する。
Non-Antigravity agents only. Get an independent second opinion from Antigravity CLI (agy). agy cannot be driven headlessly from a sandboxed agent Bash, so this skill hands the user a ready-to-run command and folds in their pasted reply.
Methodology for iteratively improving agent-facing instructions (skills / slash commands / CLAUDE.md / code-gen prompts) via bias-free executor + two-sided evaluation (self-report + instruction-side metrics). Meta-skill, invoke ONLY when the user explicitly asks for an "empirical" eval of a prompt or skill, or for the Iter-0 description / body consistency check. Do NOT auto-invoke after every skill edit; this loop is operator-triggered by name.
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
Draft a commit message from staged changes. Matches the style of recent commits in the repo, emphasizes why over what, and does not run `git commit`.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
| name | claude-second-opinion |
| description | Non-Claude agents only. Get an independent second opinion from Claude CLI on decisions with meaningful trade-offs. |
If you are a Claude agent, STOP. Tell the user this skill is for non-Claude agents only.
$ARGUMENTS if provided; otherwise infer the question from the current task context. Keep it focused on decision-relevant information:You are providing a second opinion on a decision.
Context:
<context from the current task>
Question:
<the specific question or decision point>
Provide your independent analysis. If you disagree with the current approach, explain why and suggest alternatives.
--no-sandbox (nested sandbox-exec is prohibited on macOS):If run_in_background and TaskOutput are available:
# Bash tool: run_in_background: true, timeout: 120000
claude --no-sandbox -p "$(cat <<'CLAUDE_PROMPT'
<constructed prompt>
CLAUDE_PROMPT
)" 2>&1
Then retrieve with TaskOutput (block: true, timeout: 120000).
Otherwise (tmpfile + poll):
TMPFILE=$(mktemp /tmp/claude-opinion.XXXXXX.log)
claude --no-sandbox -p "$(cat <<'CLAUDE_PROMPT'
<constructed prompt>
CLAUDE_PROMPT
)" > "$TMPFILE" 2>&1 &
PID=$!
Poll $PID every 10-15s. Hard timeout: 300s. On timeout, kill $PID and clean up $TMPFILE.
Parse output: ignore startup logs, MCP errors, and reasoning traces before the final text. Treat the last plain-text block as the answer.
Present both perspectives (labeled by model), highlight agreements and disagreements. Evaluate Claude's suggestion critically — do not blindly adopt it.
On any failure — claude not found, auth error, network error, or timeout — report the reason to the user and proceed with your own analysis only. Discard partial output on timeout as unreliable.
Use a heredoc (<<'CLAUDE_PROMPT') to build prompt text safely. This avoids shell escaping and quoting issues for multi-line content. Note that prompts passed via -p are still subject to ARG_MAX.