| name | swot-tows-analyzer |
| description | Performs a structured Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) analysis plus a Threats-Opportunities-Weaknesses-Strengths (TOWS) matrix that pairs internal strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats to generate concrete strategic options. Use when refreshing strategy after a major external change, framing a strategic-planning offsite, justifying a market move with internal-versus-external logic, or producing a quick but rigorous strategic situation read. |
SWOT-TOWS Analyzer
Goes beyond a SWOT list - pairs internal and external factors to produce real strategic options.
What this skill is
A workflow that runs a disciplined Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) analysis with evidence requirements, then constructs the Threats-Opportunities-Weaknesses-Strengths (TOWS) matrix to generate four families of strategic options: SO (use strengths to capture opportunities), ST (use strengths to defend against threats), WO (fix weaknesses to capture opportunities), and WT (fix weaknesses to defend against threats). Forces the team to act on the SWOT, not just describe it.
What it solves
- SWOT outputs that are uncritical lists ("our team is great") with no evidence
- Internal-only or external-only analyses that miss the pairing
- SWOT documents that produce no actionable strategy
- Confusion between capabilities (internal) and trends (external)
- Strategy memos that pivot on a single threat or opportunity without considering counters
When to invoke
- Annual strategic planning offsite
- After a material external change (regulatory shift, new entrant, macro event)
- Onboarding a new executive or board member to the strategic context
- Defending or challenging a major commitment with internal-versus-external logic
- Quick-turn strategy brief when a deeper framework isn't warranted
Phase 1: Source the evidence
Before drafting any quadrant, gather:
- Customer satisfaction and retention data
- Financial trends (revenue, margin, share, capital structure)
- Competitive intelligence (recent moves, hires, pricing, partnerships)
- Industry analyst reports
- Internal capabilities assessment (skills, intellectual property, data, technology, brand)
- Employee survey signals
- Macroeconomic and regulatory trackers
Each quadrant entry must reference a source. "No evidence" is itself an entry - flag it.
Phase 2: Strengths
Internal factors today, observable, distinctive versus competitors. Bar to clear:
- Is it actually distinctive, or just present? (Every player has a website.)
- Is it observable and measurable? (Customer perception, market share, Net Promoter Score (NPS), win rate.)
- Is it sustainable, or eroding?
For each strength, score:
- Distinctiveness versus competitors (1-5)
- Trajectory (improving / stable / eroding)
Phase 3: Weaknesses
Internal factors that depress performance versus competitors or versus ambition. Honest list.
Test each weakness:
- Material - does it actually impair execution or perception?
- Comparative - relative to whom?
- Actionable - within management control?
Common honest-weakness categories: capability gaps, data gaps, technical debt, organizational design, cultural friction, distribution gaps.
Phase 4: Opportunities
External trends, gaps, or events the company could capture. Sources:
- Underserved segments (from a Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD) or market-sizing analysis)
- Regulatory tailwinds
- Adjacent markets enabled by current capabilities
- Distribution channel shifts
- Competitor missteps
- Technology inflection points
Quality bar: an "opportunity" must specify the action available, not just describe a trend.
Phase 5: Threats
External factors that could damage the business. Sources:
- New entrants (specifically - who?)
- Substitute technologies or business models
- Regulatory headwinds
- Customer-segment decline
- Macroeconomic, foreign-exchange, or supply-chain risk
- Reputational risk
For each threat: probability (low / medium / high), severity (low / medium / high), time horizon (now / 1 year / 3 years).
Phase 6: Construct the TOWS matrix
| Opportunities | Threats |
|---|
| Strengths | SO - Maxi-Maxi: use strengths to capture opportunities | ST - Maxi-Mini: use strengths to defend against threats |
| Weaknesses | WO - Mini-Maxi: fix weaknesses to capture opportunities | WT - Mini-Mini: defensive moves, retreat, divest |
For each cell, generate 2-4 specific strategic options that pair a real internal factor with a real external one. Example:
- SO: "Our distribution scale × new buyer segment X → launch dedicated stock-keeping unit in Q2"
- WT: "Our technical-debt weakness × incumbent moving into our space → consider partnership or divest non-core line"
Generic statements ("invest more") are not strategic options.
Phase 7: Filter to a shortlist
For each candidate option, score 1-5:
- Strategic fit (with stated direction)
- Resource feasibility (capital, talent, capacity)
- Time-to-impact
- Reversibility
- Risk-adjusted upside
Shortlist the top 5-7 options across the four quadrants. Reject options that exist in only one quadrant - strategy that pairs only strengths with opportunities ignores defense.
Phase 8: Action plan
For each shortlisted option:
- Owner (single name, not a function)
- Specific first 90-day actions
- Resource ask
- Success metric and review cadence
- Kill criterion (when do we stop?)
Output
- Evidence-anchored SWOT with sources per item
- TOWS matrix with 8-16 specific strategic options
- Shortlist of 5-7 priorities with scoring
- 90-day action plan per priority
- Watch-list: which external signals would shift the analysis
- Pre-mortem: how each top option could fail
Operating rules
Always
- Cite a source for every SWOT item
- Test each strength for distinctiveness, not just presence
- Generate options across all four TOWS quadrants
- Pair specific internal with specific external factors
- Assign single-owner accountability
Never
- Confuse capabilities with trends (or vice versa)
- Treat SWOT as the deliverable - TOWS is the deliverable
- Generate generic options ("invest more")
- Skip the threat or weakness quadrant because it's uncomfortable
- Score options only on upside (ignore downside and reversibility)
