| name | compose-recomposition-performance |
| description | Use when investigating Jetpack Compose recomposition performance, skippable/restartable composables, composables.txt or compiler reports, Layout Inspector recomposition counts, or frame-rate State reads in composition vs layout/draw, and it is not yet clear whether the cause is parameter stability or deferred reads. Technique-layer skill — complements the codebase-specific compose-expert. |
Compose recomposition performance
Router only — deep fixes live in compose-stability-diagnostics and compose-state-deferred-reads.
Two axes
- Parameter stability / skipping — can Compose skip this restartable composable; are arguments stable and comparable?
- Where
State is read — is frame-rate State read during composition vs layout/draw?
Either axis can dominate; they combine independently.
Route here → focused skill
Review order
- Decide which axis fits the evidence; open the matching skill.
- If unclear, sample both — stability churn vs composition-phase reads of fast
State.
- Re-measure after changes.
When NOT to apply
- Recomposition tracks real data changes, or the bug is correctness not cost.
- No profiler / compiler signal suggests a problem.