القائمة
Use when simulating a journal/ML-conference reviewer for a CFD-AI/SciML manuscript, producing strengths, major concerns, reproducibility concerns, required experiments, and decision risk.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use when writing, reviewing, auditing, revising, or producing LaTeX for CFD-AI and scientific-ML manuscripts, reviews, experiment plans, reproducibility audits, related-work positioning, reviewer responses, or benchmark evaluations.
Use when stress-testing CFD, fluid mechanics, turbulence, PINN, neural-operator, surrogate, closure, or SciML manuscripts from a strict reviewer perspective.
Use when designing figures, result flow, captions, and visual evidence for CFD-AI/SciML journal manuscripts.
Use when coordinating multiple specialized CFD-AI/SciML paper agents: reviewer, evidence auditor, experiment planner, figure editor, prose editor, and final gatekeeper.
Use when auditing a CFD-AI/SciML manuscript's abstract, introduction, contributions, or discussion to verify that every claim is supported by evidence and scoped correctly.
Use when running iterative reviewer-to-editor revision of a CFD-AI/SciML manuscript: reviewer audit, editorial rewrite, re-audit, residual-risk tracking, and submission-readiness gating.
| name | reviewer-simulator |
| description | Use when simulating a journal/ML-conference reviewer for a CFD-AI/SciML manuscript, producing strengths, major concerns, reproducibility concerns, required experiments, and decision risk. |
| version | 0.3.0 |
| author | CFD-AI Paper Skills maintainers |
| metadata | {"short-description":"Reviewer simulation for CFD-AI/SciML manuscripts"} |
Use for reviewer-style critique, pre-submission risk pass, or “what will reviewers attack?” when a broader review than CFD-only checklist is needed.
low / medium / high
