中文论文一条龙工作流：以 CNKI（中国知网）为核心文献源，以 PaperSpine V4 单一入口完成配置、文献实采、引用库、动机与贡献确认、逐段蓝图、成稿、审计和 Word/LaTeX 交付。Use this skill whenever the user wants to write, rewrite, or refine a Chinese academic paper (期刊/会议/课程论文/报告) with literature from 知网/CNKI — including 选题打磨、查文献、建引用库、下载 PDF、写初稿、改稿、投稿准备. Trigger on phrases like 写论文、中文论文、知网文献、CSSCI、北大核心、核心期刊、文献综述、引用库、查重前定稿, even if the user does not name CNKI or PaperSpine explicitly. This is the unified entry point for paper-spine and the cnki-* operation skills.
检索国外/英文学术文献（OpenAlex API 为主，含引文滚雪球；Semantic Scholar 补充，Google Scholar 浏览器兜底）。Use whenever the user needs foreign-language or international literature — 外文文献、英文文献、国外研究、SSCI、谷歌学术、Google Scholar、Web of Science 替代、文献综述需要覆盖国外、citation bank 加外文、滚雪球、引文追踪、citation chasing — including searching by topic, ranking by citations, filtering by year, pulling abstracts, and chasing backward/forward citations from a seed paper. Works without captcha via OpenAlex; falls back to Scholar in the controlled Chrome only for grey literature the API misses.
选刊与按刊适配：判断一篇论文稿件适合投哪个期刊（中文/英文、人文社科），或把稿件按目标期刊的定位、体例、审稿偏好做适配改写。Use when the user asks 这篇论文投哪个期刊、适合投什么刊、选刊、期刊匹配、改投哪里、按某期刊要求写/改论文、期刊投稿要求、journal fit / where to submit / venue selection / tailor manuscript to a journal. 覆盖 229 个期刊 pack（102 中文社科 + 100 英文经管 + 27 个人文社科单刊深度包，含 APSR/AJPS/IO/World Politics、《中国社会科学》《社会学研究》《中国行政管理》）。中文论文全流程写作仍走 cnki-paper；本技能负责"投哪"与"按刊改"。
Use when planning or reporting the analysis for an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript — multilevel/HLM and growth models, IRT/measurement, quasi-experimental estimation, or qualitative coding and thematic analysis. Analysis must meet the AERA reporting standards (warrant + transparency). Strengthens analysis reporting; it does not run models for you.
Use when positioning an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript in the literature. AERJ readers span the whole field, so the paper must engage the literatures a general education-research audience expects and speak past its own subfield. Builds the positioning argument; it does not write the literature review for you.
Use when writing the response to an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) revise-and-resubmit. AERJ R&Rs come back through the handling editor and multiple masked reviewers, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident the revision is convergent. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Use when defending the research design of an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript — quantitative (multilevel, IRT, quasi-experimental, RCT), qualitative (case study, ethnography, interview), or mixed methods. AERJ judges each tradition on its own terms against the AERA reporting standards. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
Use to understand how an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript will be judged — masked/double-anonymous peer review, desk screening, integrated-journal fit, and decision categories. Sets expectations and informs strategy; it does not contact editors or reviewers.