rubric-writer

name	rubric-writer
description	Use when `paper-review` has claims plus evidence gaps and needs the final referee-style report. **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md. **Use when**: `paper-review` pipeline 的最后阶段（C3），已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`（以及可选 novelty matrix）。

Rubric Writer

Transforms review evidence artifacts into the final paper-review deliverable.

Inputs

Required:

• output/CLAIMS.md
• output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md

Optional:

• output/NOVELTY_MATRIX.md
• DECISIONS.md

Output

• output/REVIEW.md

Contract

The review must expose stable sections:

• ### Summary
• ### Novelty
• ### Soundness
• ### Clarity
• ### Impact
• ### Major Concerns
• ### Minor Comments
• ### Recommendation

Every major concern must cite its claim_id or gap_id. This is the traceability interface consumed by the paper-review scorecard.

Script boundary

scripts/run.py should:

• read prior review artifacts
• render the stable rubric sections
• keep the review bounded and traceable

It should not re-parse the manuscript from scratch or perform retrieval.

Acceptance

• output/REVIEW.md exists
• includes all stable rubric sections
• recommendation is explicit

Non-goals

• deep manuscript parsing
• novelty retrieval
• writing an author rebuttal