| name | rubric-writer |
| description | Use when `paper-review` has claims plus evidence gaps and needs the final referee-style report.
**Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md.
**Use when**: `paper-review` pipeline 的最后阶段(C3),已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`(以及可选 novelty matrix)。
**Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪(claims/evidence gaps 缺失)或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。
**Network**: none.
**Guardrail**: 给可执行建议(actionable feedback),并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact;避免泛泛而谈。
|
Rubric Writer
Transforms review evidence artifacts into the final paper-review deliverable.
Inputs
Required:
output/CLAIMS.md
output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md
Optional:
output/NOVELTY_MATRIX.md
DECISIONS.md
Output
Contract
The review must expose stable sections:
### Summary
### Novelty
### Soundness
### Clarity
### Impact
### Major Concerns
### Minor Comments
### Recommendation
Script boundary
scripts/run.py should:
- read prior review artifacts
- render the stable rubric sections
- keep the review bounded and traceable
It should not re-parse the manuscript from scratch or perform retrieval.
Acceptance
output/REVIEW.md exists
- includes all stable rubric sections
- recommendation is explicit
Non-goals
- deep manuscript parsing
- novelty retrieval
- writing an author rebuttal