القائمة
Analyze text readability with Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, SMOG, and other metrics. Returns objective scores with interpretation and recommendations.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Execute exactly one Linear issue end-to-end with branch safety, repo-discovered gates, self-QA, adversarial review, decision logging, single-source report and PR-body rendering, Ready PR creation, and autonomous post-PR review-comment handling. Use when the user says /ship, ship issue, ship Linear issue work, or asks to complete a specific Linear issue such as ENG-123; reject GitHub issues, plan phases, and vague next-work requests.
Per-feature Neon database branch for each git branch in a Drizzle + Vercel project. Schema changes use `db:push` (no migration files on feature branches); migrations are auto-generated and validated post-merge against a throwaway prod clone, then applied to prod with deploy gated on success. Use when setting up or operating a project where multiple agents/worktrees need isolated DB schemas without conflicting migration files. Triggers on "isolated db branches", "neon branching", "per-branch database", "db isolation", "drizzle migration conflict", "neon worktree", "/isolated-db-branches".
Execute one implementation slice end-to-end from either (1) a PRD plus plan plus phase, where PRD and plan may be files or GitHub issues, (2) a GitHub PRD issue plus optional work issue, or (3) a Linear issue with its project/docs as PRD context. Use when the user says "/work", "do work", "do issue work", "do linear work", asks to implement a planned phase, asks to pick/execute the next GitHub slice from a PRD, or asks to complete a Linear issue. Always includes dependency intake, clarifications, feature branch, implementation, mandatory gates, adversarial review, Playwright self-QA or fallback evidence, local conventional commit, 2-page HTML report, opening the report, pushing the branch, and opening a Ready PR whose body mirrors the report.
Run a multi-round adversarial code review with two independent AI reviewers that cross-examine each other's findings. Iterates until only nitpicks remain (max 3 rounds). Use when you want deep, debate-style review that catches issues a single pass misses. Triggers on "adversarial review", "debate review", "cross-review", "deep review".
Review and resolve unresolved GitHub PR review threads. Use when the user wants to process PR comments, address requested changes, triage reviewer feedback, reply to invalid feedback, push fixes to the PR branch, and resolve review threads safely. Adapts quality gates to the repository instead of assuming a fixed package manager or test suite.
Write a technical retrospective grounded in artifacts the user can verify — commits, PRs, ADRs, tests, logs. Use only when the user has a specific past incident with concrete evidence to cite. Refuses to fabricate stages when evidence is missing. Triggers on "engineering retrospective", "lessons-learned article", "technical postmortem write-up", or "blog post about a bug, incident, or fix".
| name | readability |
| description | Analyze text readability with Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, SMOG, and other metrics. Returns objective scores with interpretation and recommendations. |
| user-invocable | true |
| argument-hint | [text to analyze] |
Calculate and display readability metrics for the provided text.
The user provides text in $ARGUMENTS. If no text provided, ask for it.
| Metric | Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Flesch Reading Ease | 206.835 - 1.015(words/sentences) - 84.6(syllables/words) | 0-100, higher = easier |
| Flesch-Kincaid Grade | 0.39(words/sentences) + 11.8(syllables/words) - 15.59 | US grade level |
| Gunning Fog Index | 0.4[(words/sentences) + 100(complex words/words)] | Years of education |
| SMOG Index | 1.043 × √(complex words × 30/sentences) + 3.1291 | Grade level |
Complex words = 3+ syllables
## Readability Analysis
### Scores
| Metric | Score | Meaning |
|--------|-------|---------|
| Flesch Reading Ease | [X] | [interpretation] |
| Flesch-Kincaid Grade | [X] | [grade level] |
| Gunning Fog | [X] | [years education] |
| SMOG | [X] | [grade level] |
### Statistics
- Words: [X]
- Sentences: [X]
- Avg sentence length: [X] words
- Complex words: [X] ([Y]%)
### Target Audience
[Who can easily read this based on scores]
### Recommendations
1. [Specific suggestion]
2. [Specific suggestion]
3. [Specific suggestion]
| Flesch Score | Grade | Audience |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | 5th | Very easy |
| 80-89 | 6th | Easy |
| 70-79 | 7th | Fairly easy |
| 60-69 | 8-9th | Standard |
| 50-59 | 10-12th | Fairly difficult |
| 30-49 | College | Difficult |
| 0-29 | Graduate | Very difficult |
Based on scores, suggest: