| name | lit-review |
| description | Verified academic literature review — finds papers and returns registry-verified sources (Crossref/OpenAlex/Semantic Scholar/arXiv) with claim-support anchors and honestly-marked gaps. Never cites from model memory. |
| argument-hint | <topic, question, or claim to ground> |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| context | fork |
| agent | literature-scout |
Survey the academic literature on the topic below and return verified sources the main thread can cite.
$ARGUMENTS
Requirements — per ~/.claude/quality-pack/research-craft/citation-integrity.md:
- Verify-before-write: every returned source is registry-verified in this session (Crossref / OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / arXiv). DOIs and arXiv IDs are resolve targets, never generation targets.
- Label each source's verification level: existence / abstract-checked / full-text-anchored. Cross-check load-bearing records in a second registry.
- For claim-grounding requests, deliver the claim-support map (claim → source → anchor → verdict), not just a reading list.
- Mark candidates that could not be verified under
UNVERIFIED — do not cite, with what was searched.
- Generate BibTeX from registry metadata (never freehand) when requested; prefer published versions over preprints.
- Finish with a recommended reading order and the 2-3 sources the deliverable should lean on hardest.
