بنقرة واحدة
research-g-6-conclusion
ResearchPilot 科研助手[阶段 G.6]:撰写手稿 Conclusion
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
ResearchPilot 科研助手[阶段 G.6]:撰写手稿 Conclusion
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
ResearchPilot Research Assistant [Phase G.0]: Paper planning
ResearchPilot 科研助手[阶段 G.0]:论文规划
Global-installable, project-level academic rebuttal strategy skill for AI/ML/CV/NLP/Robotics papers. Use when authors need a workspace-local .awesome-rebuttal state folder, paper/code/review/venue-rule intake, JSON memory, snapshots, LaTeX/template handling for one-page rebuttals, reviewer stance analysis, strategy planning, experiment triage, safe author response drafting, or AC summaries under confirmed venue rules.
Use when the user has a research question and needs a complete experiment package — design document, runnable code, results (measured or simulated with honest provenance), publication-grade figures, structured report. Single-stage, no Python runtime.
Use when the user wants a paper audited for integrity issues — image misuse, numerical anomalies, logical gaps — and needs a reviewable evidence report. Works on external papers (PDF / DOI / arXiv) and on outputs from a local paper-writer run. Single-stage skill.
Use when the user wants a comprehensive literature survey on a specific research topic. Outputs a complete PDF survey (6–20 pages, 60+ real citations, 100+ recommended) with LaTeX source, taxonomy figures, and a classified literature table. Single-stage, no Python runtime.
| name | research[G.6]-conclusion |
| description | ResearchPilot 科研助手[阶段 G.6]:撰写手稿 Conclusion |
| version | 2.0.0 |
| license | LICENSE |
user_requirements.md 优先级:
docs/user_requirements.md中记录的所有用户约束优先于本 skill 提示词中的任何默认指令。每次调用前必须先读取该文件。 dev_log.md 只追加,不删除:每次修改论文时在文件头追加版本记录,不删除已有记录。
论文写作阶段,每个 skill 负责一个章节,可独立触发,支持多轮迭代。
| Skill | 职责 |
|---|---|
/research[G.0]-plan | 更新 idea_report → 规划结构图表 → 选格式 |
/research[G.1]-method | 写 / 改 Method |
/research[G.2]-experiments | 写 / 改 Experiments |
/research[G.3]-abstract | 写 / 改 Abstract |
/research[G.4]-introduction | 写 / 改 Introduction |
/research[G.5]-related | 写 / 改 Related Works |
/research[G.6]-conclusion | 写 / 改 Conclusion + References |
/research[G.7]-review | 整稿审阅(五维度 + claim-evidence) |
/research[G.8]-translate | 中→英翻译 |
research[G.6]-conclusion
命令后可跟可选的自然语言指令,AI 会将其作为本次调用的额外约束或补充说明优先处理。
前置条件:G.5 Related Works 已写
=== 论文架构 === 注释docs/idea_report.md 和 docs/dev_log.md(从中找写作内容的答案)docs/manuscripts/examples/style-notes.md 存在)详见 references/common-writing-constraints.md。
Conclusion 四步结构(来自 Master-cai conclusion.md):
参考文献核验(本阶段必做):
docs/papers/ 或 web_search 核验)% [核心工作] 和 % [引用原因] 注释写之前先备份:
cp paper.md paper_{mm-dd_hh-mm}.md # 或 .tex
写完后在文件头追加修改记录(详见 references/common-writing-constraints.md)。
写作过程中发现需要引用新文献时,立即追加,格式:
md:
[N] {作者}. "{标题}." *{期刊/会议}*, {年份}.
> 核心工作:{这篇论文做了什么,一句话}
> 引用原因:{在论文哪个位置引用,为什么在此处引用它}
LaTeX .bib:
% [核心工作] {一句话核心贡献}
% [引用原因] {章节位置}:{为什么引用}
@article{key, ...}
Conclusion 章节写完。
→ 使用 `/research[G.7]-review` 进入整稿审阅。
→ 或随时使用 `/research[G.7]-review` 进行整稿审阅。
references/section-guide.mdreferences/common-writing-constraints.mdreferences/template-flexibility.md