| name | research-question |
| description | Campaign: Refine hypotheses into precise, framed research questions |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | hypothesis-formation |
| type | campaign |
| input | Hypothesis + domain constraints (from hypothesis-formulation or user-provided) |
| output | Framed research question + scope + success criteria + sub-questions |
| strategies | ["framework-guided-formulation","scope-calibration","decomposition-formulation","comparative-formulation","feasibility-constrained-formulation"] |
| tactics | ["framework-selection-and-application","question-refinement-loop","sub-question-decomposition"] |
| dependencies | {"campaigns":["hypothesis-formulation"],"strategies":["comparative-formulation","decomposition-formulation","feasibility-constrained-formulation","framework-guided-formulation","scope-calibration"],"sops":["context-checkpoint","context-init","hypothesis-formation-quality-gate-check","hypothesis-formation-saturation-detection","question-synthesis"]} |
Research Question Formulation
Refine hypotheses into precise research questions — answering "how do we refine a hypothesis into a precise research question?"
HARD-GATE
Preconditions (all must hold before starting):
1. At least 1 clear hypothesis or research direction has been established
2. The research domain and constraints are known
3. The target audience is clear (academic paper? project report?)
Not satisfied → stop, recommend completing hypothesis-formulation or clarifying the research direction first.
Campaign Goal
Transform a "testable hypothesis" into a "precise research question" — the question must have a clear scope, measurable success criteria, and decomposable sub-questions. The output is a research question that can directly guide experiment design or literature review.
Strategy Selection
| Strategy | When to Use | Core action |
|---|
| framework-guided-formulation | Research type is clear, with a corresponding standard framework | Select framework → fill in |
| scope-calibration | Question is too broad or too narrow | zoom in/out |
| decomposition-formulation | High question complexity, not answerable by a single experiment | Decompose |
| comparative-formulation | A comparison of A vs B is needed | Construct the comparison |
| feasibility-constrained-formulation | The ideal question exceeds available resources | Pragmatic adjustment |
The CC selects autonomously based on hypothesis characteristics and constraints. A common combination: framework-guided → scope-calibration → decomposition.
Budget Gate
| Tier | Framework assessment | RQ output | FINER check | Sub-questions |
|---|
| S | ≥2 framework comparisons | ≥1 precise RQ | All 5 items pass | Optional |
| M | ≥3 framework comparisons | ≥2 precise RQs | All 5 items pass + success criteria | ≥3 sub-questions |
| L | ≥4 framework comparisons | ≥3 precise RQs | All 5 items pass + criteria + answering sequence | ≥5 sub-questions + dependency graph |
Research Question Structure (standard output format)
Every RQ must contain: