stress-test-perspective-rotation

name	stress-test-perspective-rotation
description	Tactic: Sequential perspective evaluation with divergence aggregation. Each agent evaluates from a distinct viewpoint, then disagreements are surfaced and resolved.
type	tactic
strategies	["society-of-mind","multi-perspective-panel"]
dependencies	{"sops":["confidence-calibration","debate-architect","divergence-detection","perspective-critic"]}

Perspective Rotation Tactic

Sequential multi-perspective evaluation followed by divergence analysis and deliberation.

Orchestration

1. debate-architect assigns N perspectives (domain expert, skeptic, practitioner, theorist, etc.)
2. [Parallel] Each perspective-critic evaluates artifact from assigned viewpoint
3. divergence-detection compares all evaluations:
   • Identifies consensus points (agreement across >70% of perspectives)
   • Identifies divergence points (disagreement across >50% of perspectives)
4. [Deliberation] Perspective-critics respond to divergence points
5. divergence-detection re-evaluates — tracks convergence trend
6. confidence-calibration determines if further rounds needed

Perspective Types

• Domain Expert (technical validity)
• Methodological Skeptic (rigor and reproducibility)
• Practitioner (real-world applicability)
• Theorist (conceptual coherence)
• Adversary (strongest possible objection)
• Novice (clarity and accessibility)

Subagents Dispatched

• debate-architect (perspective assignment)
• perspective-critic × N (evaluation from viewpoint)
• divergence-detection (agreement/disagreement mapping)
• confidence-calibration (convergence assessment)

Termination Conditions

• Convergence reached (divergence points < 2)
• Max deliberation rounds exhausted
• Saturation detected (no position changes between rounds)
• Irreconcilable disagreement identified (flagged for human review)

Available SOPs

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

SOP	When to use
confidence-calibration	Calibrates confidence scores based on debate progression. Determines whether to escalate, continue, or terminate based on cumulative evidence.
debate-architect	Designs debate structure based on artifact type — selects attack vectors, assigns perspectives, determines escalation ladder, and configures round parameters.
divergence-detection	Identifies agreement and disagreement patterns across multiple perspective evaluations. Maps consensus clusters and persistent divergence points.
perspective-critic	Evaluates artifact from a specific assigned perspective. Produces assessment grounded in that viewpoint's values, priorities, and expertise.