القائمة
Use when verifying whether the learner truly understands a concept through reasoning and application, not recall trivia.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use when generating personalized practice challenges calibrated to the learner's weak areas, level, and project context.
Use when simulating a technical interview to build confidence, expose reasoning gaps, and train structured communication under pressure.
Use when diagnosing a repeated conceptual mistake and designing a targeted correction loop to replace the faulty mental model.
Use when capturing or restoring a learner's persistent profile to personalize teaching across sessions.
Use when logging, scoring, and triaging a learner's persistent weak areas to drive intervention selection.
Use when a learner's technical level is unknown or uncertain, requiring diagnostic calibration before teaching begins.
| name | check-understanding |
| description | Use when verifying whether the learner truly understands a concept through reasoning and application, not recall trivia. |
| version | 1.1.0 |
| authors | ["edu-agent-skills contributors"] |
| tags | ["assessment","reasoning","misconception-detection"] |
| status | stable |
Assess conceptual and practical understanding using reasoning-first prompts, then adapt teaching based on detected weak areas.
teach-concept for explanation→assessment loops. Escalate to socratic-mode when misconceptions persist.Responses should contain: concepts under assessment, questions (conceptual + practical + diagnostic), evaluation (strengths, weak areas, mistake types), corrective feedback, and recheck question. Format naturally.