| name | project-planning-tracking |
| description | Plan project phases, track milestones, manage tasks, and monitor progress using structured templates and tracking mechanisms compatible with document tree organization. |
| license | MIT |
Project Planning and Tracking
Provides structured approach to project planning, milestone tracking, and progress monitoring using templates that integrate with the established document tree structure.
Intent
Plan project phases using PERT analysis and critical-path identification, track milestone and task progress, and produce dynamic tracking documents that integrate with the EDPS document tree. Owns PERT network initialisation; plan-estimateeffort supplies the duration estimates used as input.
Inputs
- Project requirements or task breakdown: Requirements document or
plan-derivetasks output
- Timeline constraints: Earliest start date, target delivery date, available resource count
- Optional:
effort-estimates.json from plan-estimateeffort — seeds PERT task durations
Outputs
project-plan.md — Full project plan with phases, milestones, Gantt representation, and PERT critical pathtasks/task-tracking.md — Dynamic tracking document with task status, owners, and progress indicators
Core Function
Input: Project requirements, timeline constraints, resource information
Output: Project plans with PERT analysis, critical path identification, milestone tracking, progress reports, dynamic task management structures
Planning Framework
1. Project Planning Workflow
## Phase 1: Project Initiation
- [ ] Project charter creation
- [ ] Stakeholder identification
- [ ] Initial requirements gathering
- [ ] Success criteria definition
- [ ] Resource assessment
## Phase 2: Planning
- [ ] Work breakdown structure (WBS)
- [ ] Timeline development
- [ ] Risk assessment
- [ ] Resource allocation
- [ ] Communication plan
## Phase 3: Execution & Monitoring
- [ ] Progress tracking
- [ ] Milestone reviews
- [ ] Risk mitigation
- [ ] Change management
- [ ] Quality assurance
## Phase 4: Closure
- [ ] Deliverable verification
- [ ] Lessons learned
- [ ] Documentation finalization
- [ ] Project closure report
2. PERT Analysis & Critical Path Management
PERT Diagram Template
Store as project-plan.md in project root:
# [Project Name] - PERT Analysis
## Task Network Diagram
```mermaid
graph LR
Start([Project Start]) --> T1[Requirements Analysis]
T1 --> T2[System Design]
T1 --> T3[Database Design]
T2 --> T4[Frontend Development]
T3 --> T4
T3 --> T5[Backend Development]
T4 --> T6[Integration Testing]
T5 --> T6
T6 --> T7[User Acceptance Testing]
T7 --> T8[Deployment Preparation]
T8 --> End([Project Complete])
Task Estimates (Three-Point Estimation)
| Task ID | Task Name | Optimistic (O) | Most Likely (M) | Pessimistic (P) | Expected Time (TE) | Variance (V) |
|---|
| T1 | Requirements Analysis | 5 days | 8 days | 15 days | 8.67 days | 2.78 |
| T2 | System Design | 3 days | 5 days | 10 days | 5.5 days | 1.36 |
| T3 | Database Design | 2 days | 4 days | 8 days | 4.33 days | 1.00 |
| T4 | Frontend Development | 8 days | 12 days | 20 days | 12.67 days | 4.00 |
| T5 | Backend Development | 10 days | 15 days | 25 days | 15.83 days | 6.25 |
| T6 | Integration Testing | 3 days | 5 days | 9 days | 5.33 days | 1.00 |
| T7 | User Acceptance Testing | 2 days | 4 days | 6 days | 4.0 days | 0.44 |
| T8 | Deployment Preparation | 1 day | 2 days | 4 days | 2.17 days | 0.25 |
Formulas Used
- Expected Time (TE): (O + 4M + P) / 6
- Variance (V): ((P - O) / 6)²
- Standard Deviation (σ): √V
Critical Path Analysis
Path Analysis
| Path | Tasks | Total Duration | Is Critical |
|---|
| Path 1 | Start → T1 → T2 → T4 → T6 → T7 → T8 → End | 38.67 days | YES |
| Path 2 | Start → T1 → T3 → T4 → T6 → T7 → T8 → End | 37.17 days | No |
| Path 3 | Start → T1 → T3 → T5 → T6 → T7 → T8 → End | 40.33 days | YES |
Critical Path: Start → T1 → T3 → T5 → T6 → T7 → T8 → End
- Duration: 40.33 days
- Standard Deviation: 3.24 days
- 99% Confidence Interval: 40.33 ± 7.77 days (32.56 - 48.1 days)
Critical Tasks (Zero Slack)
- T1: Requirements Analysis
- T3: Database Design
- T5: Backend Development
- T6: Integration Testing
- T7: User Acceptance Testing
- T8: Deployment Preparation
Forward and Backward Pass Calculations
Forward Pass (Early Start/Early Finish Calculation)
Purpose: Determines the earliest possible start and finish times for each task.
Rules:
- Early Start (ES) = Maximum Early Finish of all predecessor tasks
- Early Finish (EF) = Early Start + Task Duration
- For the first task: ES = 0 (project start)
Backward Pass (Late Start/Late Finish Calculation)
Purpose: Determines the latest possible start and finish times without delaying the project.
Rules:
- Late Finish (LF) = Minimum Late Start of all successor tasks
- Late Start (LS) = Late Finish - Task Duration
- For the last task: LF = EF (project must finish on time)
Task Schedule Analysis Table
| Task | Duration | Predecessors | Successors | Early Start | Early Finish | Late Start | Late Finish | Total Slack | Free Slack | Critical |
|---|
| T1 | 8.67 | Start | T2, T3 | 0 | 8.67 | 0 | 8.67 | 0 | 0 | Yes |
| T2 | 5.50 | T1 | T4 | 8.67 | 14.17 | 9.83 | 15.33 | 1.16 | 1.16 | No |
| T3 | 4.33 | T1 | T4, T5 | 8.67 | 13.0 | 8.67 | 13.0 | 0 | 0 | Yes |
| T4 | 12.67 | T2, T3 | T6 | 15.33 | 28.0 | 15.33 | 28.0 | 0 | 0 | Yes |
| T5 | 15.83 | T3 | T6 | 13.0 | 28.83 | 13.0 | 28.83 | 0 | 0 | Yes |
| T6 | 5.33 | T4, T5 | T7 | 28.83 | 34.16 | 28.83 | 34.16 | 0 | 0 | Yes |
| T7 | 4.0 | T6 | T8 | 34.16 | 38.16 | 34.16 | 38.16 | 0 | 0 | Yes |
| T8 | 2.17 | T7 | End | 38.16 | 40.33 | 38.16 | 40.33 | 0 | 0 | Yes |
Slack Calculations
- Total Slack: LS - ES (or LF - EF) = Maximum delay without affecting project completion
- Free Slack: Minimum ES of successors - EF = Maximum delay without affecting successors
- Critical Tasks: Tasks with Total Slack = 0
Risk Assessment
- Schedule Risk: High confidence (99%) project will complete within 48.1 days
- Critical Path Sensitivity: 5 tasks have zero slack - high sensitivity to delays
- Resource Conflicts: T4 and T5 can run in parallel (verify resource availability)
#### Dynamic PERT Update Template
Store as `pert-changes.md` in project planning folder:
```markdown
# PERT Adjustments Log - [Project Name]
## Progress Update Procedure
### Step 1: Update Task Progress
**Current Date**: [Status Date]
| Task | Planned Duration | Elapsed Time | % Complete | Actual Progress | Remaining Duration | Revised Duration |
|------|------------------|--------------|------------|-----------------|-------------------|------------------|
| T1 | 8.67 days | 6 days | 80% | 6.93 days | 1.74 days | 8.67 days |
| T2 | 5.50 days | 0 days | 0% | 0 days | 5.50 days | 5.50 days |
### Step 2: Forward Pass Recalculation
**Rules for Progress Updates**:
- **Completed Tasks**: ES = Actual Start Date, EF = Actual Finish Date
- **In-Progress Tasks**: ES = Actual Start Date, EF = Status Date + Remaining Duration
- **Future Tasks**: Recalculate ES based on new predecessor EF values
**Updated Forward Pass**:
| Task | Status | Actual/Revised ES | Actual/Revised EF | Variance |
|------|--------|-------------------|-------------------|----------|
| T1 | 80% Complete | 0 (actual) | 8.67 (forecast) | 0 days |
| T2 | Not Started | 8.67 | 14.17 | 0 days |
| T3 | Not Started | 8.67 | 13.0 | 0 days |
### Step 3: Backward Pass Recalculation
**Starting from project end date**: [Target Completion]
| Task | Revised LF | Revised LS | New Total Slack | New Critical Status |
|------|------------|------------|-----------------|-------------------|
| T1 | 8.67 | 0 | 0 | **Critical** |
| T2 | 15.33 | 9.83 | 1.16 | Non-Critical |
### Step 4: Schedule Impact Analysis
- **Project End Date Change**: [Original] → [New] ([+/- X days])
- **New Critical Path**: [Path with zero slack]
- **Slack Changes**: [Tasks that gained/lost slack]
- **Resource Reallocation Needed**: [Yes/No - details]
## Change Impact Analysis Template
### Change Request: [CR-ID] - [Description]
**Date**: [Date]
**Requested by**: [Stakeholder]
**Type**: [Add Task / Modify Duration / Change Dependencies / Remove Task]
#### Pre-Change Schedule Analysis
**Current Critical Path Duration**: [X days]
**Current Project End**: [Date]
#### Post-Change Forward Pass
Starting from project start, recalculate ES/EF for all affected tasks:
| Task | Previous Duration | New Duration | Previous ES | New ES | Previous EF | New EF | Change |
|------|------------------|--------------|-------------|--------|-------------|--------|---------|
| [Task] | X days | Y days | A | B | C | D | ±Z days |
#### Post-Change Backward Pass
Working backward from project target end date:
| Task | Previous LS | New LS | Previous LF | New LF | Slack Change | Critical Impact |
|------|-------------|--------|-------------|--------|--------------|----------------|
| [Task] | A | B | C | D | ±X days | [Yes/No] |
#### Impact Summary
- **Critical Path Duration**: [Previous] → [New] ([Change])
- **Project End Date Impact**: [±X days]
- **New Critical Tasks**: [List]
- **Tasks No Longer Critical**: [List]
- **Maximum Acceptable Delay Before Next Milestone**: [X days]
#### Mitigation Options
1. **Fast-Track Parallel Tasks**: [Specific opportunities]
2. **Crash Critical Path**: [Add resources to specific tasks]
3. **Scope Reduction**: [Non-critical features to defer]
4. **Resource Reallocation**: [Move resources from non-critical to critical tasks]
### Updated Network Diagram
[Insert updated Mermaid diagram here]
### Updated Critical Path Calculation
**New Critical Path**: [Task sequence]
**Duration**: [X days]
**Probability of On-Time Completion**: [X%]
5. Progress Tracking with ES/EF/LS/LF Updates
Weekly Progress Update Template
Store as weekly-pert-update.md:
# Weekly PERT Progress Update - [Project Name]
**Week Ending**: [Date]
**Status Cut-off**: [Day/Time]
## Task Progress Summary
| Task | Owner | Baseline Duration | Actual Start | Actual Progress | Forecast Finish | Baseline EF | Variance |
|------|-------|-------------------|--------------|-----------------|-----------------|-------------|----------|
| T1 | [Name] | 8.67 days | [Date] | 90% (7.8 days) | [Date] | [Date] | -0.87 days |
| T2 | [Name] | 5.50 days | [Date] | 40% (2.2 days) | [Date] | [Date] | +1.2 days |
## Schedule Recalculation Results
### Forward Pass Updates
**Completed this week**:
- T1: Finished 0.87 days early
- T3: Started on schedule
**Impact on future tasks**:
| Task | Previous ES | Updated ES | Previous EF | Updated EF | Schedule Impact |
|------|-------------|------------|-------------|------------|----------------|
| T2 | 8.67 | 7.8 | 14.17 | 13.3 | +0.87 days ahead |
| T4 | 15.33 | 14.46 | 28.0 | 27.13 | +0.87 days ahead |
### Backward Pass Updates
**Working from project target end**: [Target Date]
| Task | Previous LS | Updated LS | Previous LF | Updated LF | Slack Change |
|------|-------------|------------|-------------|------------|--------------|
| T2 | 9.83 | 8.96 | 15.33 | 14.46 | No change (1.16 days) |
### Critical Path Status
- **Current Critical Path**: T1 → T3 → T5 → T6 → T7 → T8
- **Duration**: 39.46 days (0.87 days ahead of baseline)
- **Project Forecast Completion**: [Date] ([X days ahead/behind target])
## Risk Assessment
### Schedule Risks
- **T2 Running Behind**: 1.2 days delay, but has 1.16 days slack - **Low Risk**
- **T5 Resource Availability**: Dependency on T3 completion - **Medium Risk**
### Opportunity Analysis
- **Early T1 Completion**: 0.87-day buffer created
: Can start T4 prep work early
: Confirm T5 resource availability for next week
: Begin T4 preliminary activities (design review prep)
: Re-baseline if T2 delay exceeds available slack
:
T2: [Date] (1.2 days late, within slack)
T3: [Date] (on schedule)
:
T4 start depends on both T2 and T3 completion
Resource allocation for T5 must be confirmed by [Date]
3. Milestone Template
Store as project-milestones.md in project root:
# [Project Name] - Milestones
| ID | Milestone | Target Date | Status | Dependencies | Notes |
|----|-----------|-------------|---------|--------------|-------|
| M01 | Requirements Complete | YYYY-MM-DD | Not Started | - | Initial req gathering |
| M02 | Analysis Phase Done | YYYY-MM-DD | Not Started | M01 | Analysis artifacts |
| M03 | Design Approval | YYYY-MM-DD | Not Started | M02 | Stakeholder sign-off |
| M04 | Development Complete | YYYY-MM-DD | Not Started | M03 | All features implemented |
| M05 | Testing Complete | YYYY-MM-DD | Not Started | M04 | QA validation |
| M06 | Production Deployment | YYYY-MM-DD | Not Started | M05 | Go-live |
## Status Legend
- **Not Started**: Planning or waiting for dependencies
- **In Progress**: Active work ongoing
- **At Risk**: Behind schedule or blocked
- **Complete**: Milestone achieved
- **Cancelled**: No longer applicable
3. Task Tracking Template
Store as project-tasks.md in project root:
# [Project Name] - Task Tracking
## Active Sprint/Iteration
**Period**: [Start Date] - [End Date]
### High Priority
- [ ] [Task Description] (Assigned: [Name], Due: [Date])
- [ ] [Task Description] (Assigned: [Name], Due: [Date])
### Medium Priority
- [ ] [Task Description] (Assigned: [Name], Due: [Date])
- [ ] [Task Description] (Assigned: [Name], Due: [Date])
### Low Priority
- [ ] [Task Description] (Assigned: [Name], Due: [Date])
- [ ] [Task Description] (Assigned: [Name], Due: [Date])
## Completed Tasks
- [x] [Completed Task] (Completed: [Date])
## Blocked/Waiting
- [ ] [Blocked Task] - Blocked by: [Reason/Dependency]
## Next Sprint Candidates
- [ ] [Future Task] (Estimated Effort: [Size])
4. Dynamic PERT-Based Task Management
Real-Time Critical Path Monitoring
Store as critical-path-monitor.md:
# Critical Path Monitoring - [Project Name]
## Current Schedule Status
**Last Updated**: [Date/Time]
**Status Date**: [Current project date]
**Critical Path Duration**: [X days]
**Project Health**: [🟢 On Track | 🟡 At Risk | 🔴 Behind]
**Baseline End Date**: [Date]
**Forecast End Date**: [Date]
**Schedule Variance**: [±X days]
### Real-Time Schedule Calculations
#### Forward Pass Status (Early Dates)
| Task | Status | Actual/Forecast ES | Actual/Forecast EF | Baseline EF | EF Variance |
|------|--------|-------------------|-------------------|-------------|-------------|
| T1 | Complete | [Date] (actual) | [Date] (actual) | [Date] | [±X days] |
| T2 | 60% Complete | [Date] (actual) | [Date] (forecast) | [Date] | [±X days] |
| T3 | Not Started | [Date] (forecast) | [Date] (forecast) | [Date] | [±X days] |
#### Backward Pass Status (Late Dates)
| Task | Current LS | Current LF | Baseline LS | Baseline LF | Allowable Delay |
|------|------------|------------|-------------|-------------|-----------------|
| T1 | [Date] | [Date] | [Date] | [Date] | [X days] |
| T2 | [Date] | [Date] | [Date] | [Date] | [X days] |
| T3 | [Date] | [Date] | [Date] | [Date] | [X days] |
### Current Critical Path Analysis
**Active Critical Path**: [Task sequence with zero slack]
**Near-Critical Paths (≤2 days slack)**:
- Path 2: [Task sequence] - [X days slack]
- Path 3: [Task sequence] - [Y days slack]
### Critical Tasks Status Detail
| Task ID | Task Name | Original Duration | Actual/Remaining | ES Status | EF Status | Slack Status | Risk Level |
|---------|-----------|-------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|--------------|------------|
| T1 | [Task] | X days | Y days remaining | [On/Late] | [On/Late] | 0 days | [🟢🟡🔴] |
### Schedule Pressure Analysis
**Tasks Under Pressure** (ES > planned ES):
- [Task]: [X days behind] expected start
- [Task]: [Y days behind] expected start
**Schedule Buffers Available**:
- Non-critical task slack: [Sum of available slack]
- Management reserve: [X days]
Resource acceleration potential: [Y days]
| Indicator | Current Value | Threshold | Status | Trend |
|-----------|---------------|-----------|---------|-------|
| Critical Path Delay | [±X days] | ±2 days | [🟢🟡🔴] | [↗↗↘] |
| Slack Consumption Rate | [X%] | >80% | [🟢🟡🔴] | [↗↗↘] |
| Task Start Variance | [±Y days] | ±1 day | [🟢🟡🔴] | [↗↗↘] |
| Resource Overallocation | [Z%] | >100% | [🟢🟡🔴] | [↗↗↘] |
:
| Current Sequence | Fast-Track Option | Risk | Time Savings |
|-----------------|-------------------|------|--------------|
| T2 → T4 | Start T4 at 80% T2 complete | Medium | 1.1 days |
| T6 → T7 | Overlap testing phases | Low | 1.5 days |
:
| Task | Current Resources | Additional Resources Available | Potential Time Reduction | Cost Impact |
|------|-------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------|-------------|
| T5 | 2 developers | +1 senior dev | 3.2 days | $X cost |
| T6 | 1 tester | +1 tester | 1.8 days | $Y cost |
:
| Feature | Associated Tasks | Schedule Impact | Business Impact |
|---------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
| [Feature] | T4.1, T4.3 | -2.1 days | Low |
| [Feature] | T7.2 | -1.5 days | Medium |
Schedule Compression Decision Framework
# Schedule Compression Analysis
## Current Situation Assessment
**Schedule Pressure**: [High/Medium/Low]
**Available Compression Time Needed**: [X days]
**Budget Availability**: [High/Medium/Low]
**Quality Requirements**: [Flexible/Fixed]
## Compression Options Matrix
| Option | Time Saved | Cost | Risk | Quality Impact | Effort |
|--------|-------------|------|------|----------------|--------|
| Fast-track T2→T4 | 1.1 days | Low | Med | Low | Low |
| Crash T5 (+resource) | 3.2 days | High | Low | None | Med |
| Scope reduction | 2.1 days | None | None | Med | Low |
| Weekend work | 1.5 days | Med | Low | Low | High |
## ES/EF/LS/LF Impact Analysis
### Fast-Tracking Impact
**Before Fast-Track**:
- T2: ES=8.67, EF=14.17, LS=9.83, LF=15.33
- T4: ES=15.33, EF=28.0, LS=15.33, LF=28.0
**After Fast-Track** (start T4 when T2 is 80% complete):
- T2: ES=8.67, EF=14.17, LS=9.83, LF=15.33 (unchanged)
- T4: ES=13.07 (early start), EF=25.74, LS=15.33, LF=28.0
- **Schedule Compression**: 2.26 days on T4 path
### Crashing Impact
**T5 with Additional Resource**:
- Original Duration: 15.83 days
- With +1 resource: 12.63 days (3.2 days saved)
- **Critical Path Impact**: ES=13.0, EF=25.63 (vs 28.83)
- **Project Completion**: 3.2 days earlier
## Recommended Strategy
Based on ES/EF/LS/LF analysis:
1. **Primary**: Fast-track T2→T4 (1.1 days, low cost/risk)
2. **Secondary**: Crash T5 if budget allows (3.2 days, higher cost)
3. **Fallback**: Scope reduction (2.1 days, no cost)
PERT-Based Estimation Refinement
# Estimation Refinement Process
## Three-Point Estimation Guidelines
### Historical Calibration
Track estimation accuracy to improve future estimates:
| Task Type | Estimation Accuracy | Adjustment Factor |
|-----------|-------------------|-------------------|
| Requirements Analysis | 85% | 1.15x |
| Design Tasks | 90% | 1.10x |
| Development | 75% | 1.30x |
| Testing | 95% | 1.05x |
### Dynamic Re-estimation Triggers
- **Scope Change**: Recalculate affected tasks and dependencies
- **Resource Change**: Update durations based on team capacity
- **Risk Materialization**: Apply contingency time to affected paths
- **Learning Curve**: Adjust estimates as team gains domain knowledge
### Estimation Update Process
1. **Identify Trigger**: [Scope/Resource/Risk/Learning change]
2. **Assess Impact**: Determine which tasks are affected
3. **Re-estimate Tasks**: Apply three-point estimation to changed tasks
4. **Recalculate Network**: Update PERT diagram and critical path
5. **Communicate Changes**: Update stakeholders on schedule impact
6. **Update Tracking**: Modify milestone dates and resource plans
Change Management Integration
# PERT-Integrated Change Management
## Change Assessment Workflow
### Step 1: Change Classification
- **Type A - Minor**: No critical path impact, <5% schedule change
- **Type B - Moderate**: Potential critical path impact, 5-15% schedule change
- **Type C - Major**: Definite critical path impact, >15% schedule change
### Step 2: PERT Impact Analysis
For each change request:
1. **Map to Network**: Identify affected tasks in PERT diagram
2. **Estimate New Durations**: Use three-point estimation for changed tasks
3. **Update Dependencies**: Modify task relationships as needed
4. **Recalculate Paths**: Determine new critical path and duration
5. **Assess Resources**: Check for resource conflicts or needs
### Step 3: Decision Matrix
| Change Impact | Business Value | Recommendation |
|---------------|----------------|----------------|
| Low + High Value | High | Approve |
| Low + Medium Value | Medium | Approve conditionally |
| Low + Low Value | Low | Defer/Reject |
| High + High Value | High | Approve with mitigation |
| High + Medium Value | Medium | Requires sponsor approval |
| High + Low Value | Low | Reject |
### Step 4: Implementation Planning
- **Timeline Adjustment**: Update project schedule
- **Resource Reallocation**: Shift resources to maintain critical path
- **Risk Mitigation**: Address new risks introduced by change
- **Stakeholder Communication**: Notify affected parties
Progress Tracking
Weekly Status Report Template
# Weekly Status Report - [Project Name]
**Week of**: [Date Range]
**Prepared by**: [Name]
**Next Update**: [Date]
## Executive Summary
[High-level status - Green/Yellow/Red with brief explanation]
## Progress This Week
### Completed
- [Accomplishment 1]
- [Accomplishment 2]
### In Progress
- [Current Work Item 1] - [% Complete]
- [Current Work Item 2] - [% Complete]
## Upcoming (Next Week)
- [Planned Task 1]
- [Planned Task 2]
## Issues & Risks
| Issue | Impact | Mitigation | Owner | Target Resolution |
|-------|--------|------------|-------|-------------------|
| [Issue] | [High/Med/Low] | [Action] | [Person] | [Date] |
## Milestone Status
- **Next Milestone**: [Name] - [Target Date] - [On Track/At Risk/Behind]
- **Key Dependency**: [What needs to happen]
## Resource Status
- **Team Availability**: [Any capacity issues]
- **Budget Utilization**: [% used / remaining]
- **Critical Needs**: [Resources needed]
## Metrics
- **Requirements**: [# Complete] / [# Total] ([% Complete])
- **Test Cases**: [# Passed] / [# Total] ([% Coverage])
- **Key Deliverables**: [# Complete] / [# Planned]
Project Health Dashboard
Store as project-health.md:
# [Project Name] - Health Dashboard
## Overall Health: [🟢 Green | 🟡 Yellow | 🔴 Red]
### Key Performance Indicators
| Metric | Current | Target | Status | Trend |
|--------|---------|---------|---------|-------|
| Schedule Adherence | [%] | 90% | [🟢🟡🔴] | [↗↗↘] |
| Budget Utilization | [%] | <80% | [🟢🟡🔴] | [↗↗↘] |
| Requirements Completeness | [%] | 100% | [🟢🟡🔴] | [↗↗↘] |
| Defect Rate | [#] | <5 | [🟢🟡🔴] | [↗↗↘] |
| Stakeholder Satisfaction | [rating] | >4/5 | [🟢🟡🔴] | [↗↗↘] |
### Risk Register
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation | Owner | Status |
|------|-------------|---------|-------------|-------|---------|
| [Risk Description] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Action] | [Name] | [Active/Resolved] |
### Change Log
| Date | Change | Impact | Approved By |
|------|--------|---------|-------------|
| [Date] | [Description] | [Schedule/Budget/Scope] | [Stakeholder] |
Integration with Document Tree
Project Structure Enhancement
Adds planning artifacts to existing project structure:
orgDocument/projects/[NN] - [project name]/
├── requirements/
├── artifacts/
├── main.md
├── project-milestones.md # Milestone tracking
├── project-tasks.md # Task management
├── project-health.md # Health dashboard
├── project-pert.md # PERT analysis and critical path
├── status-reports/ # Weekly/monthly reports
│ ├── YYYY-MM-DD-weekly.md
│ └── YYYY-MM-DD-monthly.md
└── planning/ # Planning artifacts
├── project-charter.md
├── work-breakdown.md
├── risk-register.md
├── resource-plan.md
├── pert-changes.md # PERT change log
├── critical-path-monitor.md # Real-time critical path status
└── weekly-pert-update.md # Weekly ES/EF/LS/LF progress tracking
Quick Commands
Initialize Project Planning
- Create planning folder structure
- Generate milestone template
- Create task tracking template
- Initialize health dashboard
- Create PERT analysis framework
- Set up critical path monitoring
- Set up status reporting schedule
Initialize PERT Analysis
Parameters: task_list, dependencies, duration_estimates
Actions:
- Create PERT network diagram (Mermaid format)
- Calculate three-point estimates for each task
- Identify critical path and task slack
- Generate dependency matrix
- Set up change impact tracking
- Initialize real-time monitoring
Update Project Status
- Collect Progress Data: Task completion percentages, actual durations
- Perform Forward Pass: Recalculate ES/EF from project start using actual data
- Perform Backward Pass: Recalculate LS/LF from project target end date
- Update Slack Calculations: Identify new critical path and slack changes
- Assess Schedule Impact: Compare forecast vs baseline completion dates
- Generate Variance Report: Document early/late indicators
- Update health metrics
Process Change Request
Parameters: change_description, affected_tasks, new_requirements
Actions:
- Pre-Change Analysis: Document current ES/EF/LS/LF values
- Model Change Impact: Update task durations and dependencies
- Forward Pass Recalculation: Compute new ES/EF values
- Backward Pass Recalculation: Compute new LS/LF values
- Critical Path Analysis: Identify new critical path and slack changes
- Schedule Impact Assessment: Quantify project completion date impact
- Resource and Cost Analysis: Evaluate additional resource needs
- Recommend approval/rejection with quantified impacts
- Update project documentation if approved
Weekly Progress Update Workflow
Frequency: Every week on [Day]
Actions:
- Collect Actuals: Gather actual start/finish dates and progress percentages
- Update Task Status: Mark completed tasks and remaining durations
- Forward Pass Update: Recalculate ES/EF using actual data and revised estimates
- Backward Pass Update: Verify LS/LF based on project target dates
- Slack Monitoring: Track slack consumption and critical path changes
- Variance Analysis: Compare actual vs planned ES/EF dates
- Risk Assessment: Flag tasks approaching or exceeding LF dates
- Generate Progress Report: Document schedule status and forecast
- Stakeholder Communication: Highlight critical changes requiring attention
Critical Path Optimization
Actions:
- Identify tasks with longest durations on critical path
- Analyze opportunities for task parallelization
- Consider resource reallocation options
- Evaluate fast-tracking possibilities
- Assess crashing options (adding resources)
- Update PERT network with optimizations
Milestone Review
- Evaluate milestone criteria completion
- Update milestone status
- Identify next period priorities
- Document lessons learned
- Plan celebration/communication
Planning Best Practices
- Regular Updates: Weekly task updates, bi-weekly milestone reviews
- Clear Ownership: Assign specific owners to tasks and milestones
- Realistic Estimates: Use historical data and three-point estimation with buffer time
- Early Warning: Flag risks and issues promptly, monitor slack consumption
- Stakeholder Communication: Regular, consistent status updates
- Continuous Improvement: Capture and apply lessons learned
- PERT Discipline: Update network diagram with any scope or dependency changes
- Critical Path Focus: Prioritize resources and risk mitigation on critical path tasks
- Dynamic Replanning: Reassess estimates and paths when actual progress varies significantly
- Slack Management: Use non-critical task slack strategically for risk buffering
PERT-Specific Best Practices
Calculation Procedures
Forward Pass (ES/EF Calculation):
- Start with first task: ES = 0 (or project start date)
- For each task: EF = ES + Duration
- For successor tasks: ES = Maximum EF of all predecessors
- Continue until all tasks calculated
- Project duration = Maximum EF of final tasks
Backward Pass (LS/LF Calculation):
- Start with last task: LF = EF (project target end date)
- For each task: LS = LF - Duration
- For predecessor tasks: LF = Minimum LS of all successors
- Continue backward until all tasks calculated
- Verify: LS of first task should equal ES (for critical path)
Progress Update Calculations:
- Completed Tasks: Use actual start/finish dates for ES/EF
- In-Progress Tasks: ES = actual start, EF = status date + remaining duration
- Future Tasks: Recalculate based on predecessor actual/forecast finish dates
- Time-Now Line: Draw vertical line on network at current date
Estimation Quality
- Use Historical Data: Calibrate estimates based on past project performance
- Expert Judgment: Involve technical experts in three-point estimation
- Regular Refinement: Update estimates as more information becomes available
- Conservative Optimism: Ensure optimistic estimates are truly achievable
Network Maintenance
- Version Control: Track PERT diagram changes with timestamps and reasons
- Dependency Validation: Regularly verify task dependencies are still accurate
- Path Analysis: Recalculate critical path weekly or after any major change
- Scenario Planning: Maintain alternative network configurations for major risks
Change Management
- Impact Assessment: Always quantify change impact on critical path
- Stakeholder Approval: Require sponsor approval for changes affecting critical path by >10%
- Documentation: Maintain clear audit trail of all PERT modifications
- Communication: Immediately notify team of critical path changes
Metrics and KPIs
Schedule Metrics
- Milestone completion rate
- Task completion velocity
- Schedule variance percentage
- Critical path adherence
- Critical path duration variance
- Slack consumption rate
- Estimation accuracy by task type
- Critical path change frequency
PERT-Specific Metrics
- Schedule Performance Index (SPI): Earned Value / Planned Value
- Critical Path Buffer: Available slack on near-critical paths
- Network Density: Number of dependencies / Number of tasks
- Path Convergence Risk: Number of tasks feeding into critical convergence points
- Estimation Confidence: Standard deviation of project completion time
- Change Impact Frequency: % of changes affecting critical path
Quality Metrics
- Requirements traceability
- Test case pass rate
- Defect discovery rate
- Stakeholder satisfaction scores
- Task dependency accuracy
- Estimation error trends
Resource Metrics
- Budget utilization
- Team capacity utilization
- Resource allocation efficiency
- Change request impact
Reporting Cadence
- Daily: Task updates (via comments/status), critical path task monitoring
- Weekly: Status reports and team meetings, ES/EF/LS/LF progress updates, critical path recalculation
- Bi-weekly: Milestone reviews and planning, PERT network validation
- Monthly: Health dashboard updates and stakeholder reports, estimation accuracy review
- Quarterly: Project retrospectives and process improvements, PERT methodology refinement
- Ad-hoc: Change request impact assessment, critical path optimization sessions
ES/EF/LS/LF Quick Reference
Calculation Formulas
Forward Pass (ES/EF):
- ES(task) = MAX(EF of all predecessors), with ES(first task) = 0
- EF(task) = ES(task) + Duration(task)
Backward Pass (LS/LF):
- LF(task) = MIN(LS of all successors), with LF(last task) = EF(last task)
- LS(task) = LF(task) - Duration(task)
Slack Calculations:
- Total Slack = LS - ES = LF - EF
- Free Slack = MIN(ES of successors) - EF
- Critical Path = All tasks where Total Slack = 0
Example Calculation Walkthrough
Sample Network: A(3) → B(5) → D(4) and A(3) → C(7) → D(4)
Forward Pass:
- A: ES=0, EF=0+3=3
- B: ES=3, EF=3+5=8
- C: ES=3, EF=3+7=10
- D: ES=MAX(8,10)=10, EF=10+4=14
Backward Pass (Target end=14):
- D: LF=14, LS=14-4=10
- B: LF=10, LS=10-5=5
- C: LF=10, LS=10-7=3
- A: LF=MIN(5,3)=3, LS=3-3=0
Slack Analysis:
- A: Slack = 3-0 = 3 days (Non-critical)
- B: Slack = 5-3 = 2 days (Non-critical)
- C: Slack = 3-3 = 0 days (Critical)
- D: Slack = 10-10 = 0 days (Critical)
Critical Path: A → C → D (11 days total)
Progress Update Example
Status Date: Day 5
Progress: A completed in 2 days, C is 40% complete (2.8 days done, 4.2 days remaining)
Updated Forward Pass:
- A: ES=0 (actual), EF=2 (actual)
- C: ES=2 (actual), EF=2+4.2=6.2 (forecast)
- D: ES=6.2 (forecast), EF=6.2+4=10.2 (forecast)
Schedule Impact: Project now forecast to complete on Day 10.2 instead of Day 14 (3.8 days ahead)
GitHub-Integrated Task Management
Modern Task Management Approach
For projects requiring team collaboration and external feedback, implement task management using GitHub Issues format that enables seamless integration with GitHub's issue tracking system:
Task Management Structure
projects/[NN] - [Project Name]/
├── tasks/ # Individual task files in GitHub issue format
│ ├── T##-task-name.md # Task files aligned with project plan numbering
│ ├── task-tracking.md # Overall task progress tracking
│ └── README.md # Task management workflow documentation
└── project-plan.md # Main project plan with PERT analysis
Task File Template (GitHub Issue Format)
# Issue: T## - [Task Name]
**State:** [open|ready|in-progress|review|closed]
**Labels:** [feature,core-skill,phase1]
**Assignees:** [team member]
**Milestone:** [Phase X - Phase Name]
**Priority:** [High|Medium|Low]
**Issue Number:** #T##
**Estimated Effort:** [X.X days] (from PERT analysis)
## Description
[Clear description aligned with project plan WBS]
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Specific measurable outcome]
- [ ] [Technical requirement]
- [ ] [Documentation requirement]
## Tasks
- [ ] [Detailed implementation sub-task]
- [ ] [Testing sub-task]
- [ ] [Documentation sub-task]
## Dependencies
- T##: [Prerequisite task name from critical path]
## Comments
<!-- Team feedback and discussion appear here when exported from GitHub -->
Task Tracking Dashboard (task-tracking.md)
Provides real-time view of project progress aligned with PERT analysis:
# [Project Name] - Task Tracking
**Current Phase**: [Phase X - Phase Name]
**Project Focus**: [Brief description from project charter]
## Phase 1: [Phase Name] (Current Status)
### Completed ✅
- [x] **T1 - [Task Name]** ([Completion Date])
- [x] **T2 - [Task Name]** ([Completion Date])
### In Progress 🔄
- [ ] **T3 - [Current Task]**
- **Owner**: [Team Member]
- **Due**: [Date from PERT schedule]
- **Effort**: [X.X days] (from PERT estimate)
- **Dependencies**: [Critical path dependencies]
### Ready to Start 📋
- [ ] **T4 - [Next Task]**
- **Effort**: [X.X days] (PERT estimate)
- **Dependencies**: T3 completion
## Progress Metrics
**Phase Progress**: [X]/[Total] tasks complete ([%])
**Overall Project Progress**: [X]/[Total] tasks complete ([%])
**Critical Path Status**: [On track/Behind/Ahead]
**Estimated Completion**: [Date] ([On track/X days behind/ahead])
## GitHub Integration Benefits
1. **Team Collaboration**: Distributed teams can provide feedback via GitHub comments
2. **Issue Tracking**: Full GitHub Issues functionality (labels, milestones, assignments)
3. **Traceability**: Maintain links between tasks, requirements, and project plan
4. **Version Control**: Task evolution tracked through GitHub history
: GitHub Actions can automate progress reporting and notifications
This approach combines traditional project management rigor (PERT analysis, critical path) with modern collaborative development practices (GitHub Issues, distributed feedback).
