القائمة
Compare Drupal core philosophy lenses, debate edges, and supporting evidence without simulating named contributors.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use when you have an existing component, flow, or interface and need an evidence-backed accessibility design review after basic checks pass. Best for focus management, ARIA pattern quality, semantics, and state communication gaps automated tools miss.
Use when you know what component, flow, or interface you need but not yet the right accessibility approach. Best for turning requirements into an accessible implementation plan before code hardens bad interaction and state patterns.
Review content for Google AI Overview eligibility — RAG retrievability, E-E-A-T signal completeness, fan-out coverage, semantic HTML for agent parsability, schema markup quality.
Plan AI Overview readiness improvements — RAG retrievability, E-E-A-T signals, query fan-out coverage, semantic HTML, schema markup, agentic channel setup.
Assess organizational AI readiness — capabilities, gaps, adoption roadmap for strategic planning.
Alex Urevick-Ackelsberg's personal writing voice and style. Use this skill whenever writing AS Alex or ghostwriting content that should sound like him — emails to clients, community posts, conference session descriptions, proposals, LinkedIn posts, listserv replies, internal strategy docs, or any communication where Alex is the named author. Also use when Alex asks you to 'write this up,' 'draft a response,' 'help me write,' or when the output needs his voice rather than a generic professional tone. This is Alex's PERSONAL voice — for Zivtech brand/marketing content, use zivtech-writing-style instead (though both can apply when Alex is writing on behalf of Zivtech).
| name | core-philosophy-compare |
| description | Compare Drupal core philosophy lenses, debate edges, and supporting evidence without simulating named contributors. |
Compare Drupal core philosophy lenses and the evidence behind them.
Every response must close with:
Based on public issue queue records and cross-author analysis. Not authored by or endorsed by any named contributor.
Use this skill when the user asks:
config/philosophy-lenses.jsonanalysis/lenses/author-lens-map.jsonconfig/topic-taxonomy.jsonanalysis/grounding/manifest.jsonanalysis/grounding/*.json as needed through scripts/build-grounding-bundle.pytension_axes as the default source of “normally oppositional viewpoints”.project-stewardship review lens and its supporting evidence when available.~/Codex/drupal-core-reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-{slug}.md with the required frontmatter from AGENTS.md.