autoreview
Structured Codex, Claude, Amp, Pi, or Kimi code review when explicitly requested.
القائمة
تطابق النتائج جميع كلمات البحث.
Structured Codex, Claude, Amp, Pi, or Kimi code review when explicitly requested.
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Turn ambiguous or high-impact product and engineering changes into scoped, verifiable acceptance criteria before or alongside implementation. Use when a user asks to clarify a feature, define acceptance criteria, de-risk a security/data/migration/integration change, prepare implementation requirements for another agent, or make a complex request testable. Do not trigger for trivial edits, straightforward fixes, active debugging, code review, or implementation requests whose acceptance conditions are already clear unless the user explicitly invokes this skill.
Production-ready Dart and Flutter patterns covering null safety, immutable state, async composition, widget architecture, popular state management frameworks (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider), GoRouter navigation, Dio networking, Freezed code generation, and clean architecture. Use when writing or reviewing Dart and Flutter code — state, widgets, navigation, networking, or architecture.
Orchestrate a behavior-preserving refactor — confirm tests are green, restructure without changing behavior, keep tests green, review, and gated commit. Use when the structure should improve but behavior must not change.
ウィジェットのベストプラクティス、状態管理パターン(BLoC、Riverpod、Provider、GetX、MobX、Signals)、Dartのイディオム、パフォーマンス、アクセシビリティ、セキュリティ、クリーンアーキテクチャをカバーするライブラリに依存しないFlutter/Dartのコードレビューチェックリスト。
Bootstrap pointer that installs the external repo-scan skill from a pinned, reviewable commit. Use when repo-scan must be installed before running its cross-stack source-code asset audit; this ECC pointer does not perform the audit itself.
Modern Perl 5.36+ idioms, best practices, and conventions for building robust, maintainable Perl applications. Use when writing or reviewing modern Perl 5.36+ code.
Baseline cross-project coding conventions for naming, readability, immutability, and code-quality review. Use detailed frontend or backend skills for framework-specific patterns. Use when reviewing code quality or naming with no framework-specific skill that applies.
C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.