reflect

name	reflect
description	Spawn three parallel review subagents over the active transcript, surface learnings, and route each to a concrete edit on an existing skill. Use when the user says reflect.
disable-model-invocation	true

Reflect

Mine the current conversation for durable learnings, then route them into skill edits. Three reviewers read the transcript through different lenses. An Opus synthesizer applies named criteria. The parent presents the synthesizer's output to the user, then applies the approved subset.

When to invoke

• The user said "reflect" or "/reflect".
• A complex task (5+ tool calls) just landed cleanly and the recipe is worth keeping.
• The agent hit dead ends, found the working path, and the path generalizes.
• The user corrected the agent's approach mid-task.
• A non-trivial workflow emerged that isn't captured anywhere.

Skip when the conversation is trivial, off-topic, or already covered by an existing skill the parent followed correctly. One-offs are not learnings.

Process

1. Locate the active transcript

The parent finds its own transcript file before fanning out. The system prompt names the active workspace's agent-transcripts/ directory; use that path. Do not glob across ~/.cursor/projects/*/. That crosses workspace boundaries and reads private chats from unrelated projects.

ls -t <agent-transcripts>/*.jsonl <agent-transcripts>/*/*.jsonl <agent-transcripts>/*/subagents/*.jsonl 2>/dev/null | head -10

Three transcript layouts to handle: legacy flat (<id>.jsonl), current nested (<id>/<id>.jsonl), and subagent (<parent>/subagents/<child>.jsonl).

For each candidate, read the first JSONL line and check that message.content[0].text contains the conversation's opening user prompt. Take the matching path. If no path resolves, write a tight digest of the session and pass that instead.

2. Spawn three reviewers in parallel

One message, three Task calls, subagent_type: generalPurpose, explicit model: on each, agent mode (readonly: false). Reviewers need MCP access for context lookups (tickets, chat threads, observability traces referenced in the transcript); readonly strips MCPs and defeats that. The prompt forbids file writes; the parent applies edits.

Lens	model	Prompt template
Judgment	claude-opus-4-7-thinking-xhigh	references/judgment-reviewer.md
Tooling	composer-2.5-fast	references/tooling-reviewer.md
Divergent	claude-opus-4-7-thinking-xhigh	references/divergent-reviewer.md

Pass each template verbatim, substituting the transcript path or digest where marked. Reviewers return findings in the Task response body.

3. Synthesize

One Task call, subagent_type: generalPurpose, model: claude-opus-4-7-thinking-xhigh, agent mode (readonly: false). The synthesizer's quality check includes spot-verifying citations, which can require MCP access; readonly strips MCPs and defeats that. Use references/synthesizer.md verbatim, with each reviewer's full output inlined where marked. The synthesizer returns a structured Accepted / Rejected / Backlog list.

4. Structural enforcement check

Sanity-check the synthesizer's Accepted list. For any item that would be enforced more reliably by a lint rule, script, metadata flag, or runtime check, move it from Accepted to Backlog. The synthesizer already applies this criterion; this is a final pass before edits land. See the encode-lessons-in-structure principle skill.

5. Apply

Before applying any Accepted edit, present the synthesizer's full Accepted/Rejected/Backlog output to the user and wait for explicit approval. The user picks which subset to apply and may redirect routings. Skill changes affect every future agent in the org; do not auto-apply.

Backlog items file to whatever devex / backlog tracker your team uses automatically. Those are tracker submissions, not skill edits. Only the Accepted list waits for approval.

For each approved Accepted item, follow the Routing field exactly:

• Trivial existing-skill edit (a one-line bullet, a tightened sentence, a stale fact corrected): parent does directly.
• Substantive existing-skill edit (a new section, a new pattern table, more than ~10 lines): hand to Cursor's built-in create-skill skill and run its draft / test / iterate loop.
• tune description: <skill path> (the skill exists but didn't trigger when it should have): hand to create-skill and run its description-optimization loop.
• new skill via create-skill: <kebab-name>: hand creation to create-skill. Do not invent the shape ad hoc.

For each Backlog item, file to whatever devex / backlog tracker your team uses.

If your environment ships a SKILL.md validator, run it on every touched skill before declaring done. Skip this step if it doesn't.

6. Summarize for the user

Short list, no preamble:

• Edits applied: <skill path>. What changed, one line each.
• New skills created: <skill path>. One line each (rare).
• Backlog filed to the devex tracker: <issue title> (<tags>). One line each.
• Dropped: one line per rejected finding + reason from the synthesizer.