idea-incubator

name	idea-incubator
description	A collaborative multi-agent workflow for incubating AI ideas. Uses three specialized agents—Harper (Research), Benjamin (Logic), and Lucas (Creative)—to research, debate, and refine concepts into structured projects. Trigger when message starts with "💡", "想法：", "孵化", or "incubate".

Idea Incubator

This skill facilitates a structured incubation process for AI ideas using a specialized team of three agents: Harper (Research), Benjamin (Logic), and Lucas (Creative).

The Team

• Harper 🔍 (Research / Deep Analysis Expert): Objective, data-driven, thorough. Focused on real-time search, competitor landscape, API availability, technical stacks, fact-checking, and feasibility. Provides the factual foundation.
• Benjamin ⚖️ (Logic / Debate Expert): Skeptical, rigorous, direct. Focused on edge cases, potential failure points, resource efficiency, logical consistency, and code/math verification. Stress-tests the idea.
• Lucas 🎨 (Creative / Consensus Expert): Enthusiastic, empathetic, visionary. Focused on divergent thinking, user experience, creative pivots, naming, and balancing conflicting viewpoints. Finds the path forward.

How to Trigger

Detect when a message starts with any of:

• 💡
• 想法：
• 孵化
• incubate

Workflow

1. Research Phase (Harper)

Harper conducts initial deep research on the idea:

• Search for existing competitors and similar products
• Assess technical feasibility and available building blocks
• Identify market signals and academic findings
• Summarize key facts, risks, and opportunities

2. Debate Phase (Harper + Benjamin + Lucas)

All three agents engage in free-form debate (3-5 rounds). Each agent contributes from their perspective, challenging and building on each other's arguments. The debate is not rigidly structured — let the conversation flow naturally and cover whatever dimensions the idea demands (feasibility, UX, ethics, monetization, tech stack, etc.).

3. Integration & Report

After the debate concludes:

• Synthesize a final verdict (GO / NO-GO / Conditional)
• Output the full report to ./ideal/reports/<idea-name>-incubation.md
• Update ./ideal/selected_ideas.md with the verdict summary

Note: All paths are relative to this skill's directory.

Execution Modes

This skill can operate in two modes depending on the platform's capabilities:

Mode A: Multi-Agent (platforms with sub-agent support)

When the platform supports spawning independent sub-agents (e.g., Claude Code Task(), Codex spawn_agent, OpenClaw sessions_spawn):

• Spawn each agent (Harper, Benjamin, Lucas) as a separate sub-agent with isolated context
• Each agent receives its role description + the idea + previous round's output
• This produces genuinely independent perspectives that avoid confirmation bias

Mode B: Single-Agent Simulation (default fallback)

When the platform does not support sub-agents (e.g., Antigravity):

• The main agent simulates all three roles within a single context
• Use distinct voice, tone, and reasoning style for each agent
• Be transparent in the report: note that this was single-agent simulation
• Mitigation: To reduce convergence bias, deliberately adopt each role's persona before generating their arguments — Harper should cite data, Benjamin should actively challenge, Lucas should defend

Always prefer Mode A when available. Mode B is acceptable but should be clearly labeled.

Output Structure

./ideal/
├── reports/          # Full incubation reports per idea
│   └── <idea-name>-incubation.md
├── prd/              # PRDs for approved ideas (optional, post-incubation)
│   └── <idea-name>-prd.md
└── selected_ideas.md # Master index of all incubated ideas with verdicts

Integration Guidelines

• Keep the output focused on being actionable — what to build, what to avoid, what to validate
• Ensure all findings are stored in ./ideal/
• Reference ./references/agents.md for detailed agent persona definitions