crowdsourcing-task-review-workflow

name	crowdsourcing-task-review-workflow
description	Understand and modify the full Madoc TS crowdsourcing contribution and review pipeline. Use when changing claim creation rules, crowdsourcing-task and crowdsourcing-review lifecycle behavior, reviewer assignment policy, or project settings that control submission/review flow in services/madoc-ts.

Crowdsourcing Task & Review Workflow (Madoc TS)

Goal

Provide a reliable map of how contribution tasks and review tasks are created, transitioned, and gated by project/template/site settings.

Scope

• Claim preparation and task creation decisions
• Task hierarchy creation (project -> manifest/canvas -> user tasks)
• Contribution status transitions and review task creation
• Reviewer assignment, review actions, and merge flow
• Settings that materially affect task/review behavior

Non-scope

• Generic queue infrastructure details unrelated to crowdsourcing task types
• Capture model editor UI implementation details
• Non-crowdsourcing task types

Primary Entry Points

• Contribution task handler: services/madoc-ts/src/gateway/tasks/crowdsourcing-task.ts
• Review task handler: services/madoc-ts/src/gateway/tasks/crowdsourcing-review.ts
• Claim routes: services/madoc-ts/src/routes/projects/create-resource-claim.ts
• Claim status update: services/madoc-ts/src/routes/projects/update-resource-claim.ts
• Reviewer assignment policy: services/madoc-ts/src/routes/projects/assign-review.ts
• Revision-task update guard: services/madoc-ts/src/routes/projects/update-revision-task.ts
• Claim gating helper: services/madoc-ts/src/utility/claim-utilities.ts
• Review action APIs: services/madoc-ts/src/extensions/capture-models/crowdsourcing-api.ts
• Project config schema: services/madoc-ts/src/types/schemas/project-configuration.ts

Read This Next

• Deep pipeline + setting map: references/pipeline-and-settings.md

Fast Mental Model

1. A user starts by preparing/creating a resource claim.
2. The claim route ensures task structure exists for project/manifest/canvas, then decides whether user can claim.
3. A crowdsourcing-task is created or reused and tied to a capture-model revision.
4. When the user submits (status = 2), a crowdsourcing-review task is created/reused.
5. Reviewer actions update revisions and push the user task to accepted/rejected/changes requested.
6. Parent manifest/canvas tasks and review tasks are synchronized based on subtask completion.

Lifecycle Anchors

• crowdsourcing-task events: madoc-ts.status.-1, .2, .3, .4, plus assignment notifications.
• crowdsourcing-review events: madoc-ts.created, .assigned, .status.3.

Critical Decision Points

• Claim allowed vs denied: canUserClaimResource(...) + project settings + existing subtasks.
• Manifest-vs-canvas contribution model: claimGranularity and shadow.showCaptureModelOnManifest.
• Review creation on submission: first submit creates review task, subsequent submits reuse existing active review.
• Reviewer selection: random reviewer, manual reviewer, or admin fallback.
• Flagged-cell guard: assign-review.ts checks linked submission revisions for unresolved tabular markers (status = "flag") before assignment, and AutomaticReviewBot.ts also skips submissions with unresolved flags as a safety net. Tabular markers with status = "note" are informational and do not block assignment/auto-review.

Settings With Real Runtime Effect

Treat these as first-class when debugging behavior:

• claimGranularity
• maxContributionsPerResource
• revisionApprovalsRequired
• contributionWarningTime
• randomlyAssignReviewer
• manuallyAssignedReviewer
• adminsAreReviewers
• modelPageOptions.preventContributionAfterRejection
• modelPageOptions.preventContributionAfterSubmission
• modelPageOptions.preventMultipleUserSubmissionsPerResource
• modelPageOptions.preventContributionAfterManifestUnassign
• allowSubmissionsWhenCanvasComplete
• shadow.showCaptureModelOnManifest
• reviewOptions.allowMerging
• reviewOptions.enableAutoReview

See references/pipeline-and-settings.md for each setting’s code path.

Defined But Currently Not Wired

These appear in project-template types but are not currently enforced in the main runtime path:

• ProjectTemplate.configuration.tasks.generateOnCreate
• ProjectTemplate.configuration.tasks.generateOnNewContent
• ProjectTemplate.hooks.onCreateReview
• ProjectTemplate.hooks.onAssignReview

Do not assume they affect runtime unless you add explicit call sites.

Suggested Debug Workflow

1. Start with the project config and claim input (projectId, manifestId, canvasId, revisionId, status).
2. Trace prepareResourceClaim and createResourceClaim for structure creation and gating.
3. Inspect the resulting crowdsourcing-task state (revisionId, reviewTask, userManifestTask).
4. Follow task event handlers (status.2, status.3, status.4, status.-1).
5. Trace review assignment (assign-review.ts) and review actions (crowdsourcing-api.ts).
6. Validate frontend gating in use-canvas-user-tasks.ts and use-manifest-user-tasks.ts if behavior looks inconsistent with backend.

Pitfalls

• Confusing parent structural tasks (crowdsourcing-manifest-task, crowdsourcing-canvas-task) with user contribution tasks (crowdsourcing-task).
• Debugging claim failures without checking canUserClaimResource and modelPageOptions restrictions.
• Assuming each submission creates a new review task; the system reuses active review tasks.
• Ignoring manifest-mode behavior (claimGranularity = manifest) when diagnosing canvas claim issues.
• On project collection pages and manifest canvas grids, site-collection.ts / site-manifest.ts map task state to UI filter status: 0 available/no bar, 1 in progress, 2 submitted/review, 3 completed. The "show available" filter hides 1,2,3.

Suggested Checks

• Claim same resource twice with different revisionId and verify policy behavior.
• Submit a contribution (status=2) and verify review task create/reuse behavior.
• Approve/request-changes/reject and verify user task status and notifications.
• Verify reviewer assignment policy under random/manual/admin fallback settings.