llm-writing

name	llm-writing
type	guardrail
description	Load when producing any written artifact for humans.
model-invocable	true

LLM Writing

Load /intent-modeling if it isn't already loaded.

LLM training creates default writing behaviors that show up regardless of domain. Recognizing them is most of the battle — once you notice the pull, you can judge whether to resist it or let it through for this particular piece.

Behavioral Pulls

Generating fluent text that fills structural expectations without anchoring to purpose. Summarizing with labels instead of explaining how things work. Stating conclusions without showing evidence. Applying the same structure to every document. Smoothing over genuine uncertainty. Encoding corrections as absolute prohibitions. Defining things by what they aren't. Filling space with transitions that restate what was just said.

These aren't always wrong. The failure is when they happen by default rather than by choice.

Conversational Mode Leaking into Documents

The most common structural tells come from writing as if responding to a user when producing a document for a reader who wasn't in the conversation. "It's not X — it's Y" corrects a misconception nobody has. "Let's break this down" addresses a question nobody asked. "Here's the thing" builds suspense for a reader who just wants the information. Fractal summaries recap a conversation that didn't happen.

When writing a document, write for the reader. They have no context from the conversation that prompted the document.