تشغيل أي مهارة في Manus بنقرة واحدة

$pwd:

security-audit

Name: Security Audit
Author: KnowledgeXLab

// Pre-release / open-source security audit. Scans for hardcoded credentials, dependency vulnerabilities, .gitignore gaps, and missing required files. Produces phased interactive results with a final archivable report.

تشغيل في Manus

$ git log --oneline --stat

stars:٣

forks:٠

updated:٣ أبريل ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٧:٤٤

SKILL.md

readonly

package.json

"author": "KnowledgeXLab"

"repository": "KnowledgeXLab/preflight-skill"

فتح مستودع GitHub عرض مستودعات المنشئ

$ install --global

$ download --local

تشغيل في Manus

$ useful --forSOC

محللو أمن المعلوماتمهن الحاسوب والرياضيات15-1212L4

تشغيل أي مهارة بنقرة واحدة

name	security-audit
description	Pre-release / open-source security audit. Scans for hardcoded credentials, dependency vulnerabilities, .gitignore gaps, and missing required files. Produces phased interactive results with a final archivable report.

Security Audit Skill

When to activate

Activate when the user mentions any of: "安全检查", "security audit", "pre-release", "准备开源", "密钥泄漏", "open source check", "上线前检查", "security scan", "有没有泄漏".

Execution Flow

Step 0: Detect project type

Check for the following files to determine tech stack (multiple may apply):

pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, setup.py → Python
package.json → Node.js
go.mod → Go
Cargo.toml → Rust
pom.xml, build.gradle → Java/Kotlin

Announce before starting:

检测到项目类型：[Python / Node.js / ...]
开始安全扫描，共两个自动阶段 + 一份人工自查清单...

Phase 1+2: Automated Scan

Run all checks below sequentially. Output results per check as they complete — do not wait until all checks finish.

Critical interrupt rule: When a CRITICAL issue is found, pause and ask:

发现 CRITICAL 问题，是否先修复再继续，还是扫描完成后统一处理？[先修复 / 继续扫描]

Only interrupt once per phase — batch multiple CRITICAL findings together if they appear close in sequence.

1. Hardcoded Secrets

Use Grep to search the entire codebase with these patterns:

(API_KEY|SECRET|PASSWORD|TOKEN|PRIVATE_KEY|api_key|secret_key|access_key|ak|sk)\s*[=:]\s*["'][^"']{8,}["']

Exclude from search: *.example, *.md, node_modules/, __pycache__/, .git/, dist/, build/

For each match, determine if the value looks like a real credential vs a placeholder:

Placeholders (skip): YOUR_KEY, <your-key>, xxx, ..., CHANGE_ME, sk-xxx
Real values (flag): anything that looks like an actual key (random chars, starts with known prefixes like sk-, ghp_, AKIA)

Output format:

CRITICAL  硬编码密钥
  config.yaml:17    DashScope API Key (sk-4a26...)
  embedding.py:22   SiliconFlow API Key (sk-hgmm...)

If clean:

PASS      硬编码密钥扫描：未发现

2. Git History Scan

Run:

git log --all -p | grep -iE "(api_key|secret|password|token|private_key)\s*[=:]\s*['\"][^'\"]{8,}"

If findings: CRITICAL — explain that deleting the file or adding a new commit is insufficient; the history must be wiped (git-filter-repo or orphan branch) and the key must be rotated immediately.
If clean:

PASS      Git 历史扫描：未发现密钥残留

3. .gitignore Coverage

Read .gitignore and check for the following patterns. Report each missing one as WARNING:

Pattern	Purpose
`.env`, `.env.*`, `.env.local`	环境变量文件
`.pem`, `.key`, `.p12`, `.cer`	证书与私钥
`*.log`	运行时日志
`.db`, `.sqlite`	本地数据库
`node_modules/`	Node 依赖（Node.js 项目）
`__pycache__/`, `*.pyc`	Python 缓存（Python 项目）
`dist/`, `build/`	构建产物
`.idea/`, `.vscode/settings.json`	IDE 个人配置

If all present:

PASS      .gitignore 配置：完整

4. Required Files

Check existence of:

.env.example — WARNING if missing（应提供变量名模板）
LICENSE or LICENSE.md — WARNING if missing
README.md — WARNING if missing
CONTRIBUTING.md — WARNING if missing（对外开源项目）

Output each as one line:

PASS      LICENSE 存在（AGPL-3.0）
WARNING   .env.example 缺失，建议提供变量名模板

5. GitHub Actions Secrets Check

Glob .github/workflows/*.yml and Grep for:

Credentials NOT wrapped in ${{ secrets.xxx }} syntax
Pattern to flag: literal key-like strings in env/with blocks

PASS      GitHub Actions：凭证引用规范

or:

CRITICAL  GitHub Actions：发现硬编码凭证
  .github/workflows/deploy.yml:14   API_KEY = "sk-..."

6. Internal Addresses and Connection Strings

Grep the entire codebase (excluding *.md, node_modules/, .git/) for:

Private IP ranges: 192\.168\., 10\.\d+\., 172\.(1[6-9]|2\d|3[01])\.
Localhost variants that may indicate hardcoded dev endpoints: localhost, 127\.0\.0\.1 (flag only if in non-test, non-config-example files)
Database connection strings: postgresql://, mysql://, mongodb://, redis://, jdbc:
Internal domain suffixes: \.internal, \.local, \.corp, \.intra

For each match, judge whether it belongs in source code or should be in config/env:

In a config example file or .env.example: skip
Hardcoded in application code: WARNING

WARNING   发现内网地址或连接串
  src/db/client.py:8    postgresql://admin:pass@192.168.1.10:5432/prod
  → 移至环境变量，避免暴露内部网络结构

If clean:

PASS      内网地址 / 连接串扫描：未发现

7. Sensitive Content in Code Comments

Grep comments (lines starting with #, //, /*, *) for patterns suggesting sensitive technical information:

Password-like patterns: password, passwd, pwd followed by actual values
IP addresses or connection strings embedded in comments
Tokens or keys mentioned inline

Note: Only flag technically sensitive content (credentials, addresses). Do NOT attempt to judge whether business logic in comments is "sensitive" — that requires human review and will be noted in the manual checklist.

WARNING   代码注释中发现技术敏感信息
  src/api/auth.py:42   # default password is Abc123!
  → 移除注释中的凭证信息

If clean:

PASS      代码注释扫描：未发现技术敏感信息

8. Dependency License Compatibility

Run the appropriate tool based on detected project type:

Python: pip-licenses --format=markdown (install via pip install pip-licenses if not available)
Node.js: npx license-checker --summary
Other: skip with note

Compare detected licenses against the project's own license using this compatibility reference:

Project License	Incompatible dependency licenses
MIT / Apache 2.0	GPL-2.0-only, GPL-3.0-only, AGPL-3.0
GPL-2.0	Apache-2.0 (one-way), AGPL-3.0
AGPL-3.0	generally compatible with GPL/LGPL/MIT, flag proprietary licenses
Proprietary	GPL, AGPL, LGPL (copyleft licenses)

Flag any dependency whose license is potentially incompatible as WARNING. If pip-licenses is unavailable, note it and skip.

WARNING   License 兼容性风险
  somelib 1.2.0   GPL-3.0-only
  → 项目为 MIT 协议，GPL 依赖可能引入传染性约束，建议法务确认或替换依赖

PASS      其余 42 个依赖 License 兼容（MIT / Apache-2.0 / BSD）

9. Dependency Vulnerabilities

Run the appropriate tool based on detected project type:

Python: pip-audit
Node.js: npm audit
Go: govulncheck ./... (if installed, else skip with note)
Rust: cargo audit (if installed, else skip with note)

Filtering rules — do not dump raw output. Classify and present:

Severity	Action
Critical / High + fix available	CRITICAL，说明受影响路径，给出升级版本
High + no fix	WARNING，说明无可用修复
Medium	WARNING，一句话说明影响范围
Low / Info	忽略，不展示
Dev-only dependency	降一级处理（High → Warning，Medium → 忽略）

For ambiguous cases where impact depends on usage (e.g., proxy auth, specific API endpoints), ask one targeted yes/no question before classifying.

Example output:

WARNING   pip-audit 发现 2 个需关注的漏洞

  cryptography 41.0.0   CVE-2024-xxxx  高危
    影响：RSA 解密路径，建议升级到 42.0.0

  setuptools 65.0.0     CVE-2022-xxxx  低危（构建期依赖，运行时不影响，已过滤）

If no actionable issues:

PASS      依赖漏洞扫描：无需关注的漏洞

Phase 3: Manual Checklist

After automated scan completes, output this section as a static recommendation list — do not ask questions interactively:

MANUAL    以下项目需团队人工自查（AI 无法自动验证）

  [ ] 图片、截图等静态资源中无内网地址、内部邮箱、未公开数据
  [ ] 代码注释中无业务敏感逻辑（技术性敏感信息已自动扫描）
  [ ] GitHub Collaborators 列表已清理，移除不再参与项目的成员
  [ ] 代码中无来自前公司或其他雇主的专有代码
  [ ] 若涉及用户数据，README 中已说明数据处理方式
  [ ] 已在全新环境按 README 步骤完整运行一遍，确认可正常启动

Final Report

Output a consolidated archivable report at the end:

## 安全审查报告 · [项目名] · [YYYY-MM-DD]

结论：[一句话总结，例如"发现 2 个严重问题，建议修复后再发布"或"未发现严重问题，可以开源/上线"]

---

### 严重问题（必须修复）

[若无则写"无"]

1. [问题标题]
   [文件路径或具体位置]
   → [具体操作建议]

### 警告（建议修复）

[若无则写"无"]

- [问题描述] → [建议操作]

### 通过项

[所有 PASS 项合并为一行逗号分隔，不展开细节]

### 人工自查清单

[ ] 图片、截图等静态资源中无内网地址、内部邮箱、未公开数据
[ ] 代码注释中无业务敏感逻辑（技术性敏感信息已自动扫描）
[ ] GitHub Collaborators 列表已清理，移除不再参与项目的成员
[ ] 代码中无来自前公司或其他雇主的专有代码
[ ] 若涉及用户数据，README 中已说明数据处理方式
[ ] 已在全新环境按 README 步骤完整运行一遍，确认可正常启动

Output Rules

即时输出：每项检查完成后立即输出结果，不等待全部完成
只打扰一次：CRITICAL 问题合并询问，不要每发现一个就打断一次
过滤噪音：依赖漏洞等工具的原始输出不直接展示，AI 先过滤再呈现
PASS 项简洁：通过的项一行即可，最终报告合并展示
给出 action：每个 WARNING/CRITICAL 项都要说"建议做什么"，不只是报告问题
Phase 3 不交互：人工自查清单直接输出，不逐条询问用户

name	security-audit
description	Pre-release / open-source security audit. Scans for hardcoded credentials, dependency vulnerabilities, .gitignore gaps, and missing required files. Produces phased interactive results with a final archivable report.

Security Audit Skill

When to activate

Activate when the user mentions any of: "安全检查", "security audit", "pre-release", "准备开源", "密钥泄漏", "open source check", "上线前检查", "security scan", "有没有泄漏".

Execution Flow

Step 0: Detect project type

Check for the following files to determine tech stack (multiple may apply):

pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, setup.py → Python
package.json → Node.js
go.mod → Go
Cargo.toml → Rust
pom.xml, build.gradle → Java/Kotlin

Announce before starting:

检测到项目类型：[Python / Node.js / ...]
开始安全扫描，共两个自动阶段 + 一份人工自查清单...

Phase 1+2: Automated Scan

Run all checks below sequentially. Output results per check as they complete — do not wait until all checks finish.

Critical interrupt rule: When a CRITICAL issue is found, pause and ask:

发现 CRITICAL 问题，是否先修复再继续，还是扫描完成后统一处理？[先修复 / 继续扫描]

Only interrupt once per phase — batch multiple CRITICAL findings together if they appear close in sequence.

1. Hardcoded Secrets

Use Grep to search the entire codebase with these patterns:

(API_KEY|SECRET|PASSWORD|TOKEN|PRIVATE_KEY|api_key|secret_key|access_key|ak|sk)\s*[=:]\s*["'][^"']{8,}["']

Exclude from search: *.example, *.md, node_modules/, __pycache__/, .git/, dist/, build/

For each match, determine if the value looks like a real credential vs a placeholder:

Placeholders (skip): YOUR_KEY, <your-key>, xxx, ..., CHANGE_ME, sk-xxx
Real values (flag): anything that looks like an actual key (random chars, starts with known prefixes like sk-, ghp_, AKIA)

Output format:

CRITICAL  硬编码密钥
  config.yaml:17    DashScope API Key (sk-4a26...)
  embedding.py:22   SiliconFlow API Key (sk-hgmm...)

If clean:

PASS      硬编码密钥扫描：未发现

2. Git History Scan

Run:

git log --all -p | grep -iE "(api_key|secret|password|token|private_key)\s*[=:]\s*['\"][^'\"]{8,}"

If findings: CRITICAL — explain that deleting the file or adding a new commit is insufficient; the history must be wiped (git-filter-repo or orphan branch) and the key must be rotated immediately.
If clean:

PASS      Git 历史扫描：未发现密钥残留

3. .gitignore Coverage

Read .gitignore and check for the following patterns. Report each missing one as WARNING:

Pattern	Purpose
`.env`, `.env.*`, `.env.local`	环境变量文件
`.pem`, `.key`, `.p12`, `.cer`	证书与私钥
`*.log`	运行时日志
`.db`, `.sqlite`	本地数据库
`node_modules/`	Node 依赖（Node.js 项目）
`__pycache__/`, `*.pyc`	Python 缓存（Python 项目）
`dist/`, `build/`	构建产物
`.idea/`, `.vscode/settings.json`	IDE 个人配置

If all present:

PASS      .gitignore 配置：完整

4. Required Files

Check existence of:

.env.example — WARNING if missing（应提供变量名模板）
LICENSE or LICENSE.md — WARNING if missing
README.md — WARNING if missing
CONTRIBUTING.md — WARNING if missing（对外开源项目）

Output each as one line:

PASS      LICENSE 存在（AGPL-3.0）
WARNING   .env.example 缺失，建议提供变量名模板

5. GitHub Actions Secrets Check

Glob .github/workflows/*.yml and Grep for:

Credentials NOT wrapped in ${{ secrets.xxx }} syntax
Pattern to flag: literal key-like strings in env/with blocks

PASS      GitHub Actions：凭证引用规范

or:

CRITICAL  GitHub Actions：发现硬编码凭证
  .github/workflows/deploy.yml:14   API_KEY = "sk-..."

6. Internal Addresses and Connection Strings

Grep the entire codebase (excluding *.md, node_modules/, .git/) for:

Private IP ranges: 192\.168\., 10\.\d+\., 172\.(1[6-9]|2\d|3[01])\.
Localhost variants that may indicate hardcoded dev endpoints: localhost, 127\.0\.0\.1 (flag only if in non-test, non-config-example files)
Database connection strings: postgresql://, mysql://, mongodb://, redis://, jdbc:
Internal domain suffixes: \.internal, \.local, \.corp, \.intra

For each match, judge whether it belongs in source code or should be in config/env:

In a config example file or .env.example: skip
Hardcoded in application code: WARNING

WARNING   发现内网地址或连接串
  src/db/client.py:8    postgresql://admin:pass@192.168.1.10:5432/prod
  → 移至环境变量，避免暴露内部网络结构

If clean:

PASS      内网地址 / 连接串扫描：未发现

7. Sensitive Content in Code Comments

Grep comments (lines starting with #, //, /*, *) for patterns suggesting sensitive technical information:

Password-like patterns: password, passwd, pwd followed by actual values
IP addresses or connection strings embedded in comments
Tokens or keys mentioned inline

WARNING   代码注释中发现技术敏感信息
  src/api/auth.py:42   # default password is Abc123!
  → 移除注释中的凭证信息

If clean:

PASS      代码注释扫描：未发现技术敏感信息

8. Dependency License Compatibility

Run the appropriate tool based on detected project type:

Python: pip-licenses --format=markdown (install via pip install pip-licenses if not available)
Node.js: npx license-checker --summary
Other: skip with note

Compare detected licenses against the project's own license using this compatibility reference:

Project License	Incompatible dependency licenses
MIT / Apache 2.0	GPL-2.0-only, GPL-3.0-only, AGPL-3.0
GPL-2.0	Apache-2.0 (one-way), AGPL-3.0
AGPL-3.0	generally compatible with GPL/LGPL/MIT, flag proprietary licenses
Proprietary	GPL, AGPL, LGPL (copyleft licenses)

Flag any dependency whose license is potentially incompatible as WARNING. If pip-licenses is unavailable, note it and skip.

WARNING   License 兼容性风险
  somelib 1.2.0   GPL-3.0-only
  → 项目为 MIT 协议，GPL 依赖可能引入传染性约束，建议法务确认或替换依赖

PASS      其余 42 个依赖 License 兼容（MIT / Apache-2.0 / BSD）

9. Dependency Vulnerabilities

Run the appropriate tool based on detected project type:

Python: pip-audit
Node.js: npm audit
Go: govulncheck ./... (if installed, else skip with note)
Rust: cargo audit (if installed, else skip with note)

Filtering rules — do not dump raw output. Classify and present:

Severity	Action
Critical / High + fix available	CRITICAL，说明受影响路径，给出升级版本
High + no fix	WARNING，说明无可用修复
Medium	WARNING，一句话说明影响范围
Low / Info	忽略，不展示
Dev-only dependency	降一级处理（High → Warning，Medium → 忽略）

For ambiguous cases where impact depends on usage (e.g., proxy auth, specific API endpoints), ask one targeted yes/no question before classifying.

Example output:

WARNING   pip-audit 发现 2 个需关注的漏洞

  cryptography 41.0.0   CVE-2024-xxxx  高危
    影响：RSA 解密路径，建议升级到 42.0.0

  setuptools 65.0.0     CVE-2022-xxxx  低危（构建期依赖，运行时不影响，已过滤）

If no actionable issues:

PASS      依赖漏洞扫描：无需关注的漏洞

Phase 3: Manual Checklist

After automated scan completes, output this section as a static recommendation list — do not ask questions interactively:

MANUAL    以下项目需团队人工自查（AI 无法自动验证）

  [ ] 图片、截图等静态资源中无内网地址、内部邮箱、未公开数据
  [ ] 代码注释中无业务敏感逻辑（技术性敏感信息已自动扫描）
  [ ] GitHub Collaborators 列表已清理，移除不再参与项目的成员
  [ ] 代码中无来自前公司或其他雇主的专有代码
  [ ] 若涉及用户数据，README 中已说明数据处理方式
  [ ] 已在全新环境按 README 步骤完整运行一遍，确认可正常启动

Final Report

Output a consolidated archivable report at the end:

## 安全审查报告 · [项目名] · [YYYY-MM-DD]

结论：[一句话总结，例如"发现 2 个严重问题，建议修复后再发布"或"未发现严重问题，可以开源/上线"]

---

### 严重问题（必须修复）

[若无则写"无"]

1. [问题标题]
   [文件路径或具体位置]
   → [具体操作建议]

### 警告（建议修复）

[若无则写"无"]

- [问题描述] → [建议操作]

### 通过项

[所有 PASS 项合并为一行逗号分隔，不展开细节]

### 人工自查清单

[ ] 图片、截图等静态资源中无内网地址、内部邮箱、未公开数据
[ ] 代码注释中无业务敏感逻辑（技术性敏感信息已自动扫描）
[ ] GitHub Collaborators 列表已清理，移除不再参与项目的成员
[ ] 代码中无来自前公司或其他雇主的专有代码
[ ] 若涉及用户数据，README 中已说明数据处理方式
[ ] 已在全新环境按 README 步骤完整运行一遍，确认可正常启动

Output Rules

即时输出：每项检查完成后立即输出结果，不等待全部完成
只打扰一次：CRITICAL 问题合并询问，不要每发现一个就打断一次
过滤噪音：依赖漏洞等工具的原始输出不直接展示，AI 先过滤再呈现
PASS 项简洁：通过的项一行即可，最终报告合并展示
给出 action：每个 WARNING/CRITICAL 项都要说"建议做什么"，不只是报告问题
Phase 3 不交互：人工自查清单直接输出，不逐条询问用户