بنقرة واحدة
sprint
// Work on a batch of GitHub issues in parallel using Agent Teams. Creates one worktree per issue with TDD enforcement, coordinates via a lead agent, then produces stacked PRs.
// Work on a batch of GitHub issues in parallel using Agent Teams. Creates one worktree per issue with TDD enforcement, coordinates via a lead agent, then produces stacked PRs.
| name | sprint |
| description | Work on a batch of GitHub issues in parallel using Agent Teams. Creates one worktree per issue with TDD enforcement, coordinates via a lead agent, then produces stacked PRs. |
Work on multiple GitHub issues in parallel. Each issue gets its own worktree with TDD enforcement. A lead agent coordinates, and stacked PRs are created when all work is done.
When this skill is invoked, you MUST execute these steps immediately.
Check if Agent Teams are available:
echo "${CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS:-not_set}"
If the value is not_set or empty, fall back to setup-only mode:
/write-tests to begin the TDD cycle,
or set CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 and re-run /sprint."/work-on-issue — it would create duplicate worktrees.
The worktrees and TDD markers are already set up.Extract comma-separated issue numbers from $ARGUMENTS:
# prefixes, spaces, and other punctuation67,68,69,70 or #67 #68 #69ISSUES=(67 68 69 70)Spawn one issue-worker agent per issue, all in a single message so they run in parallel:
Task tool (ALL in one message):
For issue 67:
subagent_type: issue-worker
description: "issue-worker #67"
prompt: "Read GitHub issue #67 and extract:
1. Goal
2. Acceptance criteria
3. Edge cases and constraints
4. Files likely to be touched"
For issue 68:
subagent_type: issue-worker
description: "issue-worker #68"
prompt: "Read GitHub issue #68 and extract: ..."
(etc.)
Wait for all agents to return. Collect requirements for each issue.
For each issue, create a worktree and activate TDD:
.claude/scripts/worktree-create.sh issue-<N>-<short-desc> && \
cd .worktrees/issue-<N>-<short-desc> && \
bash .claude/hooks/tdd-state.sh activate <N> && \
cd -
Before launching parallel work, check if any issues touch the same files:
Create an Agent Team with one teammate per issue.
Lead (delegate mode — coordinates only, does not implement):
Teammates (one per issue, spawned as parallel Task agents):
Task tool (ALL in one message):
For issue 67:
subagent_type: general-purpose
description: "sprint-teammate #67"
prompt: |
You are working on GitHub issue #67.
Working directory: .worktrees/issue-67-<desc>/
TDD enforcement is active.
Requirements:
<requirements from step 2>
Your workflow:
1. cd into your worktree
2. Create todos from acceptance criteria (TaskCreate)
3. For each todo, use the Task tool to spawn:
- subagent_type: tester (to write failing tests)
- subagent_type: implementer (to make tests pass)
Then run /update-docs if APIs changed
4. When all todos complete, report:
- Files you touched (git diff --name-only)
- APIs you changed (old → new signatures)
- Dependencies on other issues (if any)
- Any conflicts you encountered
For issue 68:
subagent_type: general-purpose
description: "sprint-teammate #68"
prompt: ...
(etc.)
After all teammates finish, collect from each:
Spawn the pr-planner agent to determine dependency ordering:
Task tool:
subagent_type: pr-planner
description: "pr-planner for sprint"
prompt: "Given these completed issues and their changes, determine
the optimal PR ordering. Consider file dependencies, API changes,
and which PRs can merge independently vs. which must be stacked.
Issue reports:
<collected reports>
Output: ordered list of PRs with base branches"
Then create branches and PRs. For stacked PRs, rebase each branch onto the previous one before creating the PR:
# First PR targets main directly
gh pr create --base main --head issue-67-branch ...
# Subsequent PRs: rebase onto the previous branch first
git checkout issue-68-branch
git rebase issue-67-branch
git push --force-with-lease
gh pr create --base issue-67-branch --head issue-68-branch ...
If rebase conflicts arise, report them to the user rather than auto-resolving.
Output a summary table:
## Sprint Complete
| Issue | PR | Base | Status | Files Changed |
|-------|-----|------|--------|---------------|
| #67 | #XX | main | Created | 3 files |
| #68 | #YY | issue-67-branch | Created | 5 files |
| #69 | #ZZ | issue-68-branch | Created | 2 files |
Stacked PR order: #XX → #YY → #ZZ
/work-on-issue instead)CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS env var must be set to 1/sprint 67,68,69
│
├─ Fetch requirements (parallel issue-worker agents)
├─ Create worktrees + activate TDD
├─ Create Agent Team (lead = delegate, teammates = workers)
│
├─ Teammate #67 (worktree, TDD, subagents for test/impl/docs)
├─ Teammate #68 (worktree, TDD, subagents for test/impl/docs)
├─ Teammate #69 (worktree, TDD, subagents for test/impl/docs)
│
├─ Lead mediates conflicts
├─ pr-planner determines ordering
├─ Rebase for stacking (conflicts reported to user)
└─ Stacked PRs created
Deploy an OpenEnv environment to Hugging Face Spaces. Use when asked to deploy, push to Hugging Face, or update a space.
Generate OpenEnv environments from a concrete use case (for example, "generate an env for the library textarena"). Use when asked to design or implement a new environment under envs/ by researching a target library/API, selecting matching OpenEnv examples, asking key implementation questions, and building models/client/server/openenv.yaml. Do not use for model training or evaluation tasks.
Release workflow for deploying OpenEnv environments to Hugging Face Spaces and keeping canonical references in sync.
Monitor a PR's CI checks and Greptile code review after submission. Polls CI status, auto-fixes failures via ralph-loop, waits for Greptile review, addresses comments, and iterates until green.
Diagnose and recover failing or stuck Hugging Face Space deployments for OpenEnv environments. Use when deploying envs from `envs/` to the Hub (`openenv` namespace with version suffixes), when Spaces are in `BUILDING`/`APP_STARTING`/`RUNTIME_ERROR`, or when release collections need to be reconciled after targeted redeploys.
Validate changes before submitting a pull request. Run comprehensive checks including lint, tests, alignment review, and RFC analysis. Use before creating a PR, when asked if code is ready for review, or before pushing for PR.