implement

name	implement
description	Implement a feature or fix end-to-end. Analyzes the request, builds in TDD order, runs gate checks, self-reviews with bounded loops, and reports for human approval before committing.
argument-hint	<milestone, task description, issue number, "next", or "all">

Implement

Implement the following end-to-end: $ARGUMENTS

Invocation forms

Two shapes diverge at Phase 5. /implement <FR-id> to ship one FR (most common — smoke driver + /spec-write's next step); /implement M<N> to close out a milestone (every active FR + Phase 5 close + archival). End states differ by design (STE-83): single-FR leaves FR + milestone status: active; milestone form archives both on green gate. If single-FR + plan fully checked, /gate-check probe #14 fires the STE-180 advisory (M<N> plan fully checked but not archived — run /spec-archive M<N> or /implement M<N> to close) — the gate tells you, not memory.

Phase	/implement <FR-id>	/implement M<N>
0 (Pre-flight)	single FR's binding	every active FR in M
1 (Tracker claim)	claims one ticket	claims every ticket
2 (Plan analysis)	plans tasks for the FR	plans every FR's tasks, dep-ordered
3 (TDD loop)	builds the FR	builds every FR
4 (Commit + close)	one feature commit + tracker → Done	one commit per FR + each tracker → Done
5 (Milestone close)	silent-skip (no prompt, no archival)	runs it — close prompt + archival sweep

Pre-flight: Branch Isolation

Ask the user: "Work in a git worktree (isolated branch) or on the current branch?" — worktrees let failed runs be discarded cleanly; current branch starts immediately.

If worktree: derive a branch name from the task (e.g., feat/user-auth), run git worktree add ../<branch-name> -b <branch-name>, install dependencies for the detected stack (npm install, uv sync, cargo build, go mod download, etc.), and perform all Phase 1–4 work inside the new directory. On success, tell the user how to merge back; on failure, offer git worktree remove <path> --force.

Partial Failure Recovery

If a multi-milestone worktree run partially succeeds, list completed work (milestones + commit hashes) and the failing milestone, then offer three recovery options: cherry-pick completed commits onto main (git cherry-pick <hash>...), continue in the worktree after a fix (cd <path>, resume /implement), or discard the worktree (git worktree remove <path> --force).

Phase 1: Understand

Do not read specs/frs/archive/ or specs/plan/archive/ during implementation — archived FRs and milestones are historical context only.

0. Tracker-mode probes — Before any other action:

   • 0.a Tracker availability pre-flight (STE-199 AC-STE-199.4 / AC-STE-199.5) — When mode != none, before any other Phase 1 step, enumerate the available tool list and check for mcp__<tracker>__* patterns. If zero matching tools are loadable in this session, branch on --code-only: with the flag, log tracker_skipped: pre-flight probe failed; --code-only flag honored and proceed through the code-only path (skips 0.c/0.d/0.e and Phase 4d release transition); without the flag, refuse with NFR-10 canonical shape: "Tracker <tracker> configured in CLAUDE.md but mcp__<tracker>__* tools are not available in this session. Remedy: run \claude /mcp` to (re)authenticate, or re-invoke with --code-only for a degraded tracker-skipped run."Surface atracker_skippedcapability row in the closing summary for each step the--code-onlypath skips. Vacuous onmode: none. Behavior identical to mode: nonefor the duration of the run; CLAUDE.md is **not** edited by--code-only`.
   • 0.b Provider resolution — Resolve Provider once per invocation: LocalProvider if mode: none (or --code-only flag set), TrackerProvider wrapping the configured tracker adapter otherwise. No re-resolution mid-execution. ACs come from specs/frs/<ulid>.md; Phase 4 archives via git mv; Provider.claimLock/releaseLock gates entry/exit per the Provider lifecycle contract.
   • 0.b′ Resolver entry — Call buildResolverConfig(claudeMdPath, adaptersDir) from adapters/_shared/src/resolver_config.ts once at entry, then pass the result to resolveFRArgument($ARGUMENTS, config) from adapters/_shared/src/resolve.ts. Never hand-assemble the config inline; malformed adapter metadata surfaces as MalformedAdapterMetadataError → NFR-10 canonical refusal. Route by kind: ulid → proceed to 0.c with that ULID; tracker-id / url → branch on mode: tracker mode uses findFRPathByTrackerRef(specsDir, trackerKey, trackerId), mode: none uses findFRByTrackerRef(specsDir, trackerKey, trackerId); on hit, proceed to 0.c; on miss, run importFromTracker(...) then proceed. milestone (STE-202 AC-STE-202.3) → read the milestone plan file at specs/plan/<milestone>.md and run the milestone-scope flow per § Invocation forms; fallthrough → continue to step 2 for free-form argument handling. Branch-name interop: if the branch name contains a ticket ID that disagrees with the argument's resolved ticket, the argument wins with an NFR-10-shape warning. Full decision table: docs/resolver-entry.md.
   • 0.b′¹ needs_technical_review refusal (STE-227 AC-STE-227.6) — Immediately after 0.b′ resolves a single FR (kind: ulid / tracker-id / url) and before 0.b″ branch proposal and 0.c claim, read the resolved FR's frontmatter at frFilePath. If needs_technical_review: true, hard-refuse with NFR-10 canonical shape: Verdict "/implement refused — FR <id> flagged needs_technical_review; technical sections are placeholders." and Remedy "Run /spec-write <FR-id> to complete the technical design + testing sections, then re-invoke /implement." (substitute <FR-id> with the resolved ID). Emit the implement_refused_needs_technical_review capability row in the closing summary, then exit non-zero. No claim, no branch, zero side effects — refusal fires before 0.b″ and 0.c so nothing is mutated on disk or on the tracker.
   • 0.b′² needs_technical_review milestone-scope refusal (STE-227 AC-STE-227.7) — When 0.b′ resolves kind: milestone to M<N>, before any claim cycle starts, enumerate every active FR in scope: glob specs/frs/*.md, filter by frontmatter milestone: M<N> AND status: active, then collect every FR whose frontmatter has needs_technical_review: true into a flagged-list. If the flagged-list is non-empty, hard-refuse the whole milestone with NFR-10 canonical shape: Verdict "/implement refused — milestone M<N> contains <N> FR(s) flagged needs_technical_review." and Remedy "Run /spec-write <FR-id> (no flag) for each flagged FR, then re-invoke /implement M<N>:\n - <id-1>\n - <id-2>\n - …" — the remedy enumerates every flagged FR so the reviewer can address them in one batch (no whack-a-mole). Emit the implement_refused_needs_technical_review capability row in the closing summary, then exit non-zero. Refusal fires before any claim — no per-FR claim cycle starts, no branch is proposed, no tracker write happens; nothing is mutated on disk or on the tracker for any FR in the milestone.
   • 0.b″ Branch proposal — Between 0.b′ and 0.c, if Schema L carries branch_template:, call isCurrentBranchAcceptable(currentBranch, scope) from adapters/_shared/src/branch_proposal.ts. Unacceptable ⇒ run a single LLM pass for {type, slug}, render via buildBranchProposal, prompt [Y] accept / [e] edit / [n] abort. Y → git checkout -b; n → clean exit, zero side effects. Absent branch_template: ⇒ skip entirely. Trunk-OK allowlist (STE-228 supersedes STE-202 AC-STE-202.5): the trunk-OK list narrows to TRUNK_OK_TYPES = ["ci"] only — chore and docs no longer ship directly to trunk. When the type is ci, the proposal flow accepts the trunk branch as-is. For every other type (feat, fix, refactor, perf, chore, docs), the derived branch is enforced. The same constant is consumed by requireCommittableBranch from adapters/_shared/src/require_committable_branch.ts, the universal pre-commit gate every commit-producing skill calls before staging — see STE-228 § Branch-name canonical table for the full per-skill builder mapping. Full decision logic in docs/implement-reference.md § Branch Proposal.
   • 0.c Claim — Entry gate. Tracker mode: run the per-FR claim sequence in docs/implement-tracker-mode.md § Claim runbook. Four-way routing (claimed / already-ours / taken-elsewhere / already-released) per the runbook's decision steps. mode: none: LocalProvider.claimLock writes .dpt-locks/<id>.
   • 0.d Claim verification (Phase 1-exit self-check, tracker mode only) — Before entering Phase 2, re-fetch the ticket via mcp__<tracker>__get_issue(<id>) and assert (1) status == status_mapping[in_progress] AND (2) assignee == currentUser. Mismatch ⇒ NFR-10 canonical refusal naming the ticket + observed status/assignee; hard-refuse to enter Phase 2. mode: none skips this step. Complements /gate-check's active-side ticket-state drift probe at gate time.
   • 0.e Project-milestone attach (any adapter with project_milestone: true — Linear + Jira, idempotent) — In tracker mode with project_milestone: true, after 0.d succeeds, read the FR's milestone: frontmatter and call planFileHeadingToMilestoneName(specs/plan/<milestone>.md) from adapters/_shared/src/attach_project_milestone.ts. Then call attachProjectMilestone(provider, project, canonicalName, ticketId) — Linear binds the native project milestone, Jira read-merge-writes the milestone-<M-token> label. Idempotent on already-bound tickets. Vacuous on archived FRs, mode: none, and adapters with project_milestone: false. MilestoneAttachmentError surfaces per NFR-10.
   • 0.f Tracker-mode probe — Run the Schema L probe (see docs/patterns.md § Tracker Mode Probe). If CLAUDE.md has no ## Task Tracking section, mode is none and tracker hooks below skip. If a tracker mode is active:
     • Ticket-binding pre-flight — 2-tier ticket-binding resolver + confirmation prompt per docs/ticket-binding.md. Branch-regex mismatch fails loudly; decline exits cleanly.
     • Record updatedAt (post-claimLock) — After step 0.c claimLock has succeeded, call the adapter's pull_acs(ticket_id) and store the ticket's updatedAt in-session for /gate-check to compare later. Recording after claimLock is load-bearing: claimLock itself mutates the ticket, so recording before would cause /gate-check to flag the skill's own write as drift. Same rule applies to any other tracker-writing pre-flight step.
     • Bidirectional AC diff/resolve — Run the bidirectional AC sync loop before proceeding past Phase 1. See docs/implement-tracker-mode.md for the full tracker-mode flow.

1. Check for specs — If specs/ exists, check whether spec files have real content. If specs exist but are mostly empty, warn the user: "Specs appear to be incomplete. SDD works best when specs are filled in first. Consider running /dev-process-toolkit:spec-write or continue with what's available?" Let the user decide.

2. Resolve the target — Determine what to implement based on $ARGUMENTS:

   • next ⇒ first milestone in specs/plan/ with unchecked ACs (report All milestones complete. if none).
   • all / remaining ⇒ all milestones with unchecked ACs, run sequentially after presenting the list for approval.
   • Multiple milestones (e.g., M2 and M3) ⇒ run sequentially in listed order.
   • Single milestone name (M1, M2) ⇒ read that milestone from specs/plan/<M#>.md.
   • Numeric ⇒ gh issue view $ARGUMENTS.
   • Filename in .tasks/ ⇒ read the task file.
   • Otherwise ⇒ read relevant specs in specs/ (if present) or treat as task description.

   Slim closure detection (STE-200 AC-STE-200.3, milestone-scope only). After the target resolves to M<N>, count claimable_fr_count(M<N>) — active specs/frs/*.md files with milestone: M<N> frontmatter. When the count is zero AND evaluatePlanOnlyEligibility(specsDir, "M<N>") returns eligible (kind: scaffolding OR all-checked), route to slim closure: skip claim/build phases, invoke /spec-archive M<N> (which auto-takes the plan-only branch per AC-STE-200.1) + surface a plan_only_archival capability row in the closing summary; jump straight to Phase 5 (which silent-skips per AC-STE-200.4 on kind: scaffolding and zero-FR milestones — no /ship-milestone chain prompt fires). Documented as the /setup-bootstrap-milestone path.

3. Read the gate commands — Read CLAUDE.md and find the gate check commands (look for "Key Commands" or "Gating rule" section). These are the commands you'll use throughout.

4. Verify baseline health — Run the gate commands now, before writing any code. If the project is already broken, fix it first (or tell the user). Do not build new features on a broken foundation.

5. Read relevant code — Find the files that need to change.

6. Build the AC checklist — Extract every acceptance criterion as a binary pass/fail checklist. If no explicit ACs exist, derive them from the description. This checklist is your definition of done.

7. Present the plan — Show the user: AC checklist, files to create/modify, test strategy. Warn about parallel-conflict risk on shared files (like index.ts barrel exports). Ask for approval before proceeding.

Phase 2: Build (TDD)

8. Execute in TDD order via the multi-agent orchestrator —

   TDD Orchestrator Contract. Violation name: Inline TDD Antipattern (writing tests + code in the parent /implement context instead of forking the orchestrator). Auditable evidence shape: N Skill(/dev-process-toolkit:tdd <FR-id>) tool_use entries where N = FR count in milestone scope — one orchestrator invocation per FR, no inlined RED→GREEN→REFACTOR in the parent transcript. Residual-risk note: the STE-220→STE-270 prose-falsification chain shows prose alone is falsifiable; the documented escalation path on repeat violation is an evidence-based gate (STE-262 / STE-270 pattern) or a hard mechanic (STE-225 pattern). Catalog: docs/honored-contracts.md.

   Rationalization Prevention. The following rationalizations are documented antipatterns — each is preempted here so they cannot be invoked as waivers:

   Excuse	Reality
   Milestone spans N FRs / many ACs — orchestrator cost is too high	Cost is not a contract waiver; orchestrator-per-FR IS the milestone-scope pattern (STE-225).
   /implement M<N> milestone-scope has no clear "use the orchestrator N times" pattern	N-times IS the pattern: one Skill(/dev-process-toolkit:tdd <FR-id>) tool_use per FR in scope — N invocations where N = FR count.
   Prioritized shipping over process fidelity	Process fidelity IS the ship gate, not its competitor; an FR shipped via inline TDD has not shipped through the contract.

   invoke /dev-process-toolkit:tdd <FR-id> inline (no separate opt-in path). Per STE-225 + STE-296, the orchestrator runs RED → GREEN → REFACTOR → AUDIT via four forked subagents (test-writer once per FR with the full AC list batched; implementer once per AC; refactorer once at end after all GREEN; spec-reviewer once at end post-REFACTOR) with context: fork isolation, a strict tdd-result fenced-block hand-off contract, and bounded retry (max 2 per role per AC for semantic failures A/B/C/E; single targeted retry for format violation D). Per-stage isolation enforces the test-writer-cannot-see-implementation guarantee deterministically. The orchestrator's halt path does pause for the operator — that's intentional, not a pacing violation: halt fires only after the bounded-retry cap is exhausted, so it surfaces a real failure. Routine cycles (no retries) run end-to-end without operator interaction. Follow project patterns from CLAUDE.md.

9. Spec deviation check — If reality contradicts the spec, STOP coding forward and classify: underspecified (backfill + test + continue), ambiguous (provisional decision + user confirm at Phase 4), contradicts (wait for user decision), infeasible (wait). Always backfill edge cases to specs/requirements.md / specs/technical-spec.md plus a test. Full playbook: docs/implement-reference.md § Spec Deviation Check.

Spec Breakout

If the current milestone accumulates 3 or more contradicts / infeasible deviations (configurable; default 3), STOP, emit a Spec Breakout report, recommend a spec rewrite for the affected areas before resuming. Breakout is a valid output, not a failure. Full report shape: docs/implement-reference.md § Spec Breakout.

10. Checkpoint — After completing each logical unit of work (a TDD cycle for a meaningful chunk), create a git commit on the working branch. These intermediate commits are recovery points.

11. Gate check — Run the gate commands from step 3. This is the deterministic kill switch: if it fails, fix before proceeding. Use /dev-process-toolkit:debug for unclear failures.

Parallelization

For fan-out-friendly tasks (independent files, ≥3 workers worth of work), parallel dispatch via native subagents, agent-teams, or worktree-per-subagent isolation can keep each context clean. See docs/parallel-execution.md before dispatching.

Phase 3: Self-Review Loop (max 2 rounds)

The gate check is the hard stop. This review loop is the smart stop.

Phase 3 review runs against the code Phase 2 produced via the /dev-process-toolkit:tdd orchestrator. If the orchestrator halted (bounded-retry exhausted on mode A/B/C/D/E per STE-225), Phase 2 already escalated to the operator and Phase 3 does not run — the halt report is the surfaced failure. Otherwise Phase 3's gate check is the deterministic backstop that confirms the orchestrator's GREEN-at-exit claim against the project's full gate command (typecheck + lint + tests).

Spec-review audit capability propagation (STE-296). When the /tdd orchestrator's spec-review audit step fires, /implement propagates its outcome through the Phase 4 step 14 closing summary as one of three literal, byte-checkable capability tokens — sourced from the static map in skills/spec-write/SKILL.md § 7 (single source of truth for capability-gap rendering):

• audit clean on first pass ⇒ MUST emit tdd_spec_audit_passed (literal token, backticked).
• audit found missing AC(s) on first pass and a bounded retry round (test-writer + implementer scoped to missing ACs) recovered them ⇒ MUST emit tdd_spec_audit_missing_recovered (literal token, backticked).
• audit found missing AC(s) on first pass and the bounded retry round did not recover them ⇒ orchestrator halts with mode: spec-gap and MUST emit tdd_spec_audit_halted (literal token, backticked); /implement surfaces the unresolved AC list to the operator and exits non-zero before Phase 4 step 15.

The byte-checkable tokens are the structural signals /gate-check's closing_summary_capability_keys probe greps for; narrative prose like "spec audit was clean" is insufficient. Plain-language rendered prose lives in the skills/spec-write/SKILL.md § 7 static map under the same keys; do not paraphrase at runtime.

Proportional review: Scale review depth to change size. Trivial changes (single function, <20 lines, no new modules) need only AC + gate check. Reserve deep review for changes touching multiple modules or new patterns.

Each round has three sequential stages. Complete each stage before starting the next. If a stage finds issues, fix them and re-run the gate before proceeding.

12. Round N (N = 1, 2):

Stage A — Spec Compliance

a. AC check — Walk the checklist from Phase 1. For each AC:

• ✓ Pass — implemented and directly tested (not just indirectly covered)
• ✗ Fail — missing or wrong
• ⚠ Partial — implemented but incomplete or only indirectly tested

If an AC explicitly names a module or function, verify a test file directly tests that module. Indirect coverage does NOT satisfy an explicit AC.

b. Cross-module coverage check — For every module created or significantly modified, verify direct test coverage. If an AC references a specific module without a dedicated test file, flag it as a gap.

c. Assertion quality check — Scan test files for shallow assertions: expect(fn).not.toThrow() / assert not raises as the sole assertion, expect(result).toBeDefined() / assert result is not None without checking the value, type-only checks (isinstance(), typeof) without verifying content. Tests using only these patterns aren't validating behavior — strengthen them.

If Stage A finds issues: fix, re-run gate check, then proceed to Stage B.

Stage B — Two-Pass Review (delegated to code-reviewer)

Stage B runs two sequential code-reviewer invocations via the Agent tool: Pass 1 — Spec Compliance then Pass 2 — Code Quality. Both use agents/code-reviewer.md's canonical rubric; only the prompt differs. Delegation keeps each review in an isolated context.

If Pass 1 returns critical findings, do NOT run Pass 2; surface Pass 1 findings and stop.

Resolve <base-ref> once before either pass: feature branch's merge base (e.g., git merge-base HEAD main), HEAD~1 on a hotfix on main, or HEAD if Phase 2 left uncommitted changes.

Pass 1: Spec Compliance

Runs only if specs/requirements.md exists. Otherwise skip silently and run Pass 2 as the sole review (graceful degradation).

d. Invoke code-reviewer via the Agent tool with this prompt:

Pass 1 — Spec Compliance. Check whether every change in the diff traces to an acceptance criterion in specs/requirements.md, and flag any code with no corresponding AC (undocumented behavior).

Changed files (name + status):
<paste output of: git diff --name-status <base-ref>>

Acceptance criteria from Phase 1 (this IS your concern):
<paste AC checklist>

Read specs/requirements.md directly. Use your Read tool to open each changed file. Return findings in the Pass-Specific Return Contracts shape documented in agents/code-reviewer.md (one line per AC: OK or CONCERN, plus OVERALL).

e. Integrate Pass 1:

• OVERALL: OK → Pass 1 passes; run Pass 2.
• OVERALL: CONCERNS (critical: undocumented features or missing AC coverage) → fail-fast. Skip Pass 2. Report Pass 2 as the literal line Pass 2: Skipped (Pass 1 critical findings) — never silently omitted. Fix findings, re-run gate check, then re-invoke Pass 1 on round 2 — if round 2 still fails, escalate.

Pass 2: Code Quality

Runs only if Pass 1 returned OVERALL: OK, or Pass 1 was skipped because specs/ does not exist.

f. Invoke code-reviewer via the Agent tool with this prompt:

Pass 2 — Code Quality. Review changes against the canonical rubric (quality, security, patterns, stack-specific). Do NOT check spec compliance — Pass 1 (or /spec-review) owns that.

Changed files (name + status):
<paste output of: git diff --name-status <base-ref>>

Acceptance criteria from Phase 1 (context only, not your concern):
<paste AC checklist>

Read the project's CLAUDE.md for stack-specific patterns. Use your Read tool to open each changed file you need to inspect — the caller has not inlined the diff bodies. Return findings in the exact shape documented at the bottom of agents/code-reviewer.md.

g. Integrate Pass 2 — one line per criterion (<criterion> — OK or <criterion> — CONCERN: file:line — <reason>), ending with OVERALL: OK or OVERALL: CONCERNS (N).

• OVERALL: OK → Stage B passes; proceed to Stage C.
• OVERALL: CONCERNS → fix each concern, re-run gate check, then re-invoke Pass 2 if you're still on round 1. On round 2, escalate.
• Either subagent errors or returns an unparseable shape → fall back to reading agents/code-reviewer.md and executing the corresponding pass's rubric inline. Never skip Stage B because delegation failed.

Stage B report aggregates under two subheadings: ### Pass 1: Spec Compliance and ### Pass 2: Code Quality. The Pass 2 block must exist even when skipped (use the literal skipped line above). Advisory-note capture: when the round-2 escalation routes one or more Pass 2 CONCERNS to advisory rather than gate-blocking, capture each in advisoryNote[] — record schema { pass: 2, concern, rationale, classification: 'advisory' } — before exiting Stage B. The array threads into Phase 4 step 14 and § Milestone Archival via a single shared formatter; without this capture, advisory concerns disappear from claude -p runs (caught by an earlier smoke-test). Full schema + rationale: docs/implement-reference.md § Advisory Notes.

Stage C — Hardening (first round only)

After Stage B passes on round 1, run a hardening pass. Skip on round 2 (diminishing returns). Cover negative/edge-case tests + an error-path audit. See docs/implement-reference.md § Phase 3 Stage C — Hardening Pass.

Decision (deterministic, not vibes)

h. Decision: GATE PASSED ⇒ exit loop. GATE PASSED WITH NOTES ⇒ carry notes into Phase 4 report, exit loop. Issues on round 1 ⇒ fix + re-run gate + go to round 2. Issues on round 2 ⇒ escalate to user. Full matrix: docs/implement-reference.md § Decision matrix.

i. After any fix — re-run the full gate fresh, cite actual numbers (e.g., "47 tests, 0 failures, 0 errors"). Never claim clean from memory.

Phase 4: Report & Handoff

Four labeled sub-steps in order: Phase 4a (gate-check passed — no new logic), Phase 4b (doc fragment hook; writes docs/.pending/<fr-id>.md when docs generation is enabled), Phase 4c (report at step 14 + human approval at step 15), Phase 4d (Close procedure: commit → Provider.releaseLock → Provider.getTicketStatus).

Phase 4b: Doc fragment

Non-blocking hook between Phase 4a (gate pass) and Phase 4c (report + approval). Call readDocsConfig(CLAUDE.md) from adapters/_shared/src/docs_config.ts; both userFacingMode and packagesMode false (or ## Docs absent) ⇒ silent no-op, zero output. Otherwise run /docs --quick with a 60s timeout (FR ID resolves via branch_template: mapping, diff scan, or _unbound-<ts> fallback — no new flag). On success append | Doc fragment | added | docs/.pending/<fr-id>.md | — | to the Spec Deviation Summary table; on non-zero exit / thrown error / 60s timeout (text: timeout after 60s) append | Doc fragment | skipped (error) | — | /docs --quick failed: <first-line-of-error>. Run manually after commit to retry. | and continue to Phase 4c — the implementation commit never blocks on a failed fragment write. Full decision table (resolver fallback ordering, log shape): docs/implement-reference.md § Phase 4b Doc Fragment Hook.

Phase 4b' — cross-cutting spec propagation (STE-215). Between the doc-fragment hook and Phase 4c. Derive deletedFiles[] from git diff --name-status <baseline>..HEAD --diff-filter=D (never recall from session memory) and call scanCrossCuttingSpecRefs(removedPath, specsDir) from adapters/_shared/src/scan_cross_cutting_spec_refs.ts per deleted path — the helper is detection-only, returning per-file lists of {line, snippet, kind: 'treeLeaf' | 'proseMention'} hits. For every treeLeaf hit, delete that line in specs/technical-spec.md / specs/testing-spec.md via the Edit tool (the line is inside a ``` fence — drop it whole; never rewrite surrounding text). Prose-mention hits stay untouched — record their file:line + snippet in the propagation commit body so the operator can amend in a follow-up if the surrounding sentence needs restructuring. ≥1 hit across either spec ⇒ emit one follow-up chore(specs): propagate <removed-path> removal to cross-cutting specs between the implementation commit and any archival commit; zero hits ⇒ silent no-op. The cross_cutting_spec_stale_file_refs /gate-check probe is the read-side safety net for paths that bypass this. Full edit policy: docs/implement-reference.md § Phase 4b' Cross-Cutting Spec Propagation.

Commit message format

Phase 4 commits use Conventional Commits v1.0.0 — enforced by the commit-msg hook installed by /setup. The proposed <type>(<scope>): <title> (≤ 72 chars) plus body and Refs: STE-<N> footer is rendered to the user at the step 14 approval gate before step 15 commits, so the user can redirect type/scope before commit. Use ! for breaking changes (feat(api)!:, feat!:).

Full type heuristic table, scope-selection rules, and canonical example: docs/implement-reference.md § Commit message format.

Spec Deviation Summary

Before updating specs, compile all deviations discovered during Phase 2 into a table with columns Deviation | Classification | Resolution | Needs Confirmation?. Classification ∈ underspecified / ambiguous / contradicts / infeasible. Any row with Classification = ambiguous must have Needs Confirmation? = **Yes**.

Milestone Archival

After the human approves the Phase 4 report (step 15), and only then, archive every FR belonging to the completed milestone plus the milestone's plan file. This keeps specs/frs/ and specs/plan/ size bounded.

• technical-spec.md is never auto-archived — ADRs use Superseded-by: in place. /implement archival touches only specs/frs/** and specs/plan/<M#>.md.
• Run archival only after explicit human approval in step 15, never before. If the user asks for changes instead, abort archival entirely.
• Single-FR runs (/implement <FR-id>) intentionally leave status: active; bulk archive a completed milestone via /spec-archive M<N> before running /ship-milestone.

Procedure summary. For each archived FR, first run git status --porcelain specs/frs/<name> and feed the output to isFRUntrackedInPorcelain(porcelain, frPath) (adapters/_shared/src/spec_archive/stage_untracked_fr.ts). When it returns true, run git add specs/frs/<name> before git mv specs/frs/<name> specs/frs/archive/<name> — otherwise git mv falls back to plain mv for untracked files and git log --follow loses rename history (smoke #6 F2). Then (STE-210 AC-STE-210.2 — staging-order reorder for tracked-modified FRs): (1) git mv specs/frs/<name> specs/frs/archive/<name> first (stem preserved per NFR-15; the rename is staged with the working-tree content at this moment), (2) edit the frontmatter at the new archive path (flip status: active → archived + set archived_at: <ISO now>), (3) git add specs/frs/archive/<name> to re-stage the post-edit content. Editing frontmatter before git mv would stage the rename with un-flipped index content (the F11 bug — archive commits landing with status: active). Optional convenience: archiveFRWithFlip(repoRoot, frPath, archivedAt) → archivePath from adapters/_shared/src/archive_fr.ts runs the post-git mv frontmatter flip and returns the absolute archive path so the caller threads it into git add. The three-step caller pattern is git mv → archiveFRWithFlip(...) → git add (the helper covers step 2 only; the git invocations stay in skill prose where the Bash tool runs them). archived_at precision: full ISO-8601 with date + time + Z (e.g., 2026-04-30T17:23:11Z); not date-only with zeroed time (2026-04-30T00:00:00Z is the regression shape). Render the wall-clock instant of the archive commit via date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ, never the shorter date +%Y-%m-%d form — the latter rounds to midnight UTC. An earlier smoke caught the LLM-rendered midnight value; the prose is now pedantic so the prompt is unambiguous. Plan-status flip: git mv specs/plan/<M#>.md specs/plan/archive/<M#>.md and apply the same status: active → archived flip + archived_at to the plan frontmatter — same atomic commit, same full-ISO-8601 timestamp (date + time + Z). Frontmatter-prepend (legacy plans, STE-197 AC-STE-197.4): if the plan file lacks a --- YAML frontmatter block at the very top, prepend ---\nstatus: archived\narchived_at: <ISO timestamp>\n---\n\n before the # Implementation Plan H1, in the same atomic commit. Backwards-compat for /setup-generated plans written before STE-197 shipped (no frontmatter to flip — synthesize one with the archived state directly). Before staging, call rewriteArchiveLinks(repoRoot, frId) per FR (adapters/_shared/src/spec_archive/rewrite_links.ts) to rewrite traceability references in specs/requirements.md, active plans, archive plans, and CHANGELOG's unreleased prefix. Append shipped-AC traceability row. Per archived FR, call appendTraceabilityRow(repoRoot, frId, acNumbers, implFiles, testFiles) from adapters/_shared/src/spec_archive/append_traceability_row.ts — acNumbers is the list of AC indices that shipped (1, 2, 3, … from the FR's ## Acceptance Criteria block); implFiles and testFiles are derived from git diff --name-status <baseline>..HEAD --diff-filter=AM filtered for non-test (implFiles) and *.test.* (testFiles) paths. The helper appends one row of shape | AC-<frId>.<lo>..<hi> | <impl-files> | <test-files> | to specs/requirements.md § 6 Traceability Matrix; idempotent on re-run so a follow-up /implement against the same FR detects the existing row and no-ops. Call cleanupPlanVerifyLines(projectRoot, deletedFiles, addedTestFiles) (adapters/_shared/src/spec_archive/cleanup_plan_verify_lines.ts) to update verify: lines that reference deleted paths. Derive deletedFiles[] deterministically via git diff --name-status <baseline>..HEAD --diff-filter=D (parse D <path> rows) — never recall from session memory. The helper has a filesystem fallback (STE-171 AC-STE-171.3): when deletedFiles[] is empty or doesn't match a verify line, it auto-detects path-shaped tokens that don't resolve on disk and treats them as effectively-deleted — same heuristic as /gate-check probe #28. The fallback is defense-in-depth only; the explicit --diff-filter=D derivation is still the load-bearing input. All moves + flips + rewrites land in one atomic commit. On any helper throw, abort cleanly — do not commit, do not call Provider.releaseLock; surface NFR-10 canonical refusal naming the offending plan file:line:column. Then call Provider.releaseLock(id) for each released FR. Advisory-note persistence: before staging the archive moves, for each FR, append a ## Implementation notes body section to the FR markdown after ## Notes — body is the FR's slice of advisoryNote[] rendered via the same shared formatter as Phase 4 step 14 (byte-identical bullet bodies); empty slice ⇒ heading plus the literal line No advisory notes. — never absent, so the archived FR carries the audit trail past the session window. Full procedure detail: docs/implement-reference.md § Phase 4 Milestone Archival.

Post-Archive Drift Check

After the archive move completes, run the post-archive drift check from skills/spec-archive/SKILL.md § Post-Archive Drift Check. For Pass B, build the brief from this milestone's context: just-archived milestone + FR IDs, a one-paragraph excerpt of the new archive file's title and goal lines only, and the standard scope-framing instruction. Render the unified Schema I table; offer the 3-choice UX. The drift check never blocks the already-completed archival.

For reopens, cross-cutting ACs, or anything this auto-path can't reach, /dev-process-toolkit:spec-archive is the escape hatch.

13. Update specs — If implementing a milestone from specs/plan/<M#>.md:

    • Update the milestone's acceptance criteria from - [ ] to - [x] for each AC that passed.
    • If specs/requirements.md has a traceability matrix, update Implementation and Tests columns with actual file paths.

14. Report — Present: AC checklist with pass/fail status; files created/modified; test coverage (which cases tested; flag modules without direct tests); self-review findings (caught + fixed; what remains); spec changes (edge cases added, deviations resolved, provisional decisions needing confirmation); drift findings (when specs/ exists); gate check result citing actual output (e.g., 0 failures, 0 errors); number of review rounds used. Archival hygiene — when § Milestone Archival ran, list rewrote N traceability links in M plan files, updated N plan task-list verify lines, appended N traceability row(s) to specs/requirements.md § 6, and staged N untracked FR file(s) before git mv. Advisory notes section: after the items above, append a ## Advisory notes section rendering the advisoryNote[] list captured in Phase 3 Stage B as one bullet per advisory entry, in capture order, body shape <concern> — <rationale>. Zero entries ⇒ heading plus the literal line No advisory notes. — never absent, so the operator never confuses "no concerns" with "concerns hidden". Shared formatter with the archived-FR write below: bullet bodies are byte-identical.

15. Wait for approval, then run the Close procedure — Ask the user to review before committing. Do NOT commit until the user explicitly says so.

    Phase 4 Close (atomic — all three steps required, in order)

    Once approved, execute the Close procedure end-to-end. Sub-steps (b) and (c) run only after git commit lands at (a):

    (a) git commit — final commit (includes any FR archive moves on a full-milestone run). (b) Release — for every claimed ticket, run docs/implement-tracker-mode.md § Release runbook. No exit path skips this step. On a full-milestone run where § Milestone Archival already released each archived FR, skip the per-ticket call here for those same FRs (double-call avoidance). (c) Post-release verification — assert returned status matches status_mapping.done. Mismatch ⇒ NFR-10 refusal + exit non-zero.

    Abort boundary — do NOT call releaseLock or getTicketStatus on gate-check failure, Spec Breakout, user rejection at step 15, or any Phase 1–3 early exit. The lock stays so a follow-up run can resume through the already-ours path. Full Close text + abort cases: docs/implement-reference.md § Phase 4 Close.

Phase 5: Milestone close prompt

Fires only on a milestone-scope invocation (/implement M<N>) that shipped every FR cleanly. Opt-in chain into /ship-milestone M<N> — a prompt, not a silent chain. Phase 5 is the last thing /implement does before process exit.

Silent skip cases: single-FR arg (a tracker ID, ULID, or URL), 'all' / 'remaining' / no arg / empty invocation, any FR in specs/plan/M<N>.md still status: active, or any gate-check failed this run (partial success). Scaffolding-milestone skip (STE-200 AC-STE-200.4): zero FR files in specs/frs/ for M<N> AND/OR plan frontmatter kind: scaffolding ⇒ no chain prompt — scaffolding milestones don't get release-version bumps. Non-TTY stdin (CI / piped) ⇒ print the hint, do not prompt.

Otherwise print the prompt (exact format including the blank line):

All FRs in M<N> shipped.

Run /ship-milestone M<N> now? (y/n):

• Accept — input is y or yes (case-insensitive, trimmed). Chain into /ship-milestone M<N> in-process. All of /ship-milestone's own gates still fire — the release commit is gated by its own deciding Apply? [y/N] prompt. The y here does not pre-approve the release; refusal at that second gate exits cleanly without a release commit.
• Decline — input is n / no / empty / any other non-matching string. Do not chain; print the hint and exit 0: Ready to close milestone. Run: /ship-milestone M<N>.

Chain-failure refusal: if /ship-milestone fails to start, surface an NFR-10 shape and exit non-zero:

/implement: attempted to chain into /ship-milestone but it failed to start: <error>.
Remedy: verify the plugin is installed and the skill is enabled — `claude /plugin list` lists installed plugins and their skills. Then run /ship-milestone M<N> manually.
Context: milestone=M<N>, chain=ship-milestone, skill=implement

Full skip-case table: docs/implement-reference.md § Phase 5.

Rules

• Do NOT proceed if the gate check fails — fix first
• Do NOT skip tests — always write tests before implementation
• Do NOT commit without user approval
• Do NOT self-review more than 2 rounds — escalate instead of looping
• Do NOT silently work around a broken spec — update the spec first (Phase 2 step 9)
• Do NOT let edge cases live only in code — always backfill specs
• Do NOT modify or delete existing tests to make new code pass — if an existing test fails, either the new code is wrong or the spec changed (and spec changes need user approval)
• Tracker writes during /implement are exactly the calls in the Claim and Release runbooks (docs/implement-tracker-mode.md) — claim at Phase 1 step 0.c, release at Phase 4d step (b). Other tracker writes mid-flow (raw mcp__<tracker>__save_issue / mcp__<tracker>__transition_status for arbitrary field updates, AC toggles outside the bidirectional sync loop) are forbidden. Read operations (mcp__<tracker>__get_issue for display, the runbooks' own re-fetches) are permitted. Rationale: the runbook's no-Backlog-to-Done-leap guardrail only fires on the runbook path; ad-hoc MCP writes bypass it.
• The gate check (deterministic) always overrides judgment about quality
• ACs are binary (pass/fail) — no "good enough"
• Every AC that names a specific module requires a direct test for that module
• Stage A → Stage B → Stage C — do not blend them
• Before claiming any phase complete, run the gate command fresh and cite actual output. Do NOT claim completion from memory of a previous run.
• Forbidden: "tests pass", "should be fine", "I verified" without citing actual command output

Red Flags

If you hear yourself thinking any of these, stop and apply the rule anyway:

• "I'll run gate-check after the next task" / "I know the tests pass" → run it now, read actual output
• "This is too simple to need a failing test first" / "I'll test after, it's almost done" → write the test first
• "It should work now" → "should" is not a gate result; "The spec says X but Y works better" / "Just one small edge case" → update the spec first, backfill now

Architecture Note

This skill runs in-process in the main session — deliberately not context: fork. Phase 3 Stage B spawns the code-reviewer subagent via the Agent tool, and Claude Code forbids nested subagent spawns. The review-fix loop additionally requires findings to flow back to the same implementer that wrote the code. Full rationale: docs/patterns.md § Pattern: /implement Runs In-Process.