exploring-signals-scouts

name	exploring-signals-scouts
description	How to explore and make sense of PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and emit findings into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to understand what scouts they have, how each one is behaving, and whether the fleet is actually working. Covers surveying the fleet and its schedules, reading recent scout runs and drilling into a single run's reasoning, inspecting the durable scratchpad memory the fleet has built up, tracing a run to the findings it emitted, and assessing a scout's health and performance over time (cadence, success rate, emit rate, signal-to-noise). Read-only and exploratory — to write or tune a scout, use `authoring-signals-scouts` instead. Trigger on "what are my scouts doing", "how is my <x> scout performing", "show me recent scout runs", "why did this scout find/emit nothing", "what has the fleet learned", "explore scout run <id>", "is my scout working".
metadata	{"owner_team":"signals"}

Exploring Signals scouts

A scout is a scheduled agent that wakes on its own interval, looks at one PostHog project, decides what's genuinely worth surfacing, and either emits it as a finding into the Signals inbox or closes out empty (a real, valid outcome). PostHog ships a fleet of canonical scouts — a cross-product generalist (signals-scout-general) plus per-surface specialists (error tracking, logs, AI observability, experiments, feature flags, session replay, web analytics, surveys, and more). A project may also have custom scouts beyond the canonical fleet — any signals-scout-* skill a team authored (e.g. -brand-mentions, -mcp-feedback) shows up here too, so don't assume a fixed roster: signals-scout-config-list is the authoritative roster for a project.

This skill helps you understand and explore what a project's scouts are doing and how they're performing — entirely through read-only MCP tools. It is the observability counterpart to the authoring-signals-scouts skill (which teaches writing and tuning) and to the inbox-exploration skill (which covers the inbox reports scouts feed into).

There are five things you can observe about the fleet, each with its own tool:

What you want to know	Tool	What it tells you
Which scouts run, how often, in what posture	signals-scout-config-list	One row per scout: schedule, enabled, emit, last_run_at
What the scouts actually did, run by run	signals-scout-runs-list / -retrieve	Per-run status, timing, end-of-run summary, emitted_count, deep-link
What the fleet has learned across runs	signals-scout-scratchpad-search	Durable per-team memory (baselines, noise, allowlists)
What the scouts actually emitted	execute-sql over document_embeddings	The authoritative per-finding record (weight, severity, confidence) — see below
What the scouts surfaced to the user	inbox-reports-list	Findings that cleared the bar and became inbox reports

The orienting sixth is signals-scout-project-profile-get — the deterministic snapshot of "what's true about this project" that every scout cold-starts from. When a scout found nothing, this is usually why.

Output handling: expect to offload to a file

Two of these tools — signals-scout-runs-list and especially tasks-runs-session-logs-retrieve — routinely return payloads that overflow an MCP client's token budget and get spilled to a file. This is the normal path, not an error. Plan for it up front rather than discovering it after a failed call:

• Keep limit small on signals-scout-runs-list (~10–15). Each row carries a long prose summary, and runs come back newest-first across the whole fleet, so even a modest page is large.
• Session logs are large by nature. A single run's log is hundreds of KB to a few MB. Fetch it with call --json (so the saved file is real JSON, not the pretty text format — jq-able) and read the saved file with jq / a script rather than inline.
• Don't hand-parse the session log. The bundled scripts/ do the reconstruction for you — see below.

Start here: is the fleet even set up?

Don't assume the project has scouts. The fleet only runs on teams enrolled via the signals-scout feature flag, and a project may have no configs, all-disabled scouts, or scouts stuck in dry-run. Run this first whenever a user asks about their scouts for the first time in a session.

signals-scout-config-list

Read the result against three cases:

The config list is unpaginated — it comes back as { results: [...] } (a bare array), with no count field. Read the result against three cases:

• Empty (results: []) — no scouts are registered. The project isn't enrolled in the scout fleet (or hasn't ticked yet). Say so plainly; don't go fishing for runs. Point the user at the Signals scout settings / PostHog Code onboarding rather than inventing activity.

• Configs exist but all enabled: false — the fleet is registered but paused. Nothing is running. Tell the user which scouts exist and that they're all off.

• At least one enabled: true — the fleet is registered and that scout is allowed to run. For each enabled scout note its run_interval_minutes (cadence), emit (false = dry-run, runs but writes nothing to the inbox), and last_run_at. One caveat before reporting "it's live": runs are gated by the signals-scout feature flag, not by enabled. A project that was enrolled and later drained from the flag keeps its enabled: true rows, but the coordinator no longer plans runs for it — so a stale or null last_run_at on an enabled scout usually means the project is no longer enrolled, not that the scout is idle.

  last_run_at is a dispatch stamp, not proof a run executed. The coordinator advances it the moment it enqueues a child workflow for a due scout — before any worker picks the run up. Child dispatch is fire-and-forget, so if workers are saturated or down the children just queue and no run ever materializes, yet last_run_at keeps marching forward each tick. So a recent last_run_at means "dispatched this tick," not "a run is genuinely happening." The authoritative liveness signal is the newest actual run row in signals-scout-runs-list, not the config stamp. Cross-check them: if last_run_at is fresh (minutes ago) but no run row has appeared for that scout in well over its run_interval_minutes, the fleet is dispatching but not running — workers backed up / down, or runs stranded — a real reliability problem, not a live scout. Don't report "it's running" off last_run_at alone.

A scout that is enabled: true but emit: false is the most common source of "my scout isn't doing anything" confusion: it is running and reasoning every tick, it just isn't allowed to post findings yet. Always surface the emit posture when reporting on a scout.

See references/scout-data-model.md for every field on a config, run, and scratchpad entry, the run status values, and how the pieces link together.

Workflow: survey the fleet

"What scouts do I have / what are they doing?" — lead with config-list, then enrich with the most recent run per scout so the user sees liveness, not just configuration.

1. signals-scout-config-list — the roster.
2. For each enabled scout, signals-scout-runs-list and pick the newest run with a matching skill_name (runs come back newest-first across the whole fleet, so a single call usually covers everyone). Report status and how long ago it ran.

Present it as a table the user can scan — scout, cadence, posture, last run, last outcome — and call out anything anomalous (never run, last run errored, stuck in dry-run for a long time).

Workflow: understand one scout end to end

"How does my error-tracking scout work / how is it doing?"

1. Read its config — find the row in config-list for signals-scout-error-tracking: schedule, posture, last run.
2. Read its body — posthog:llma-skill-get {"skill_name": "signals-scout-error-tracking"} returns the team's actual instruction set (which may be a canonical default or a diverged, hand-edited row). This is what the agent is told to do every run — its signal-vs-noise discriminator, explore patterns, and disqualifiers. To understand why a scout behaves the way it does, read its body.
3. Read its recent runs — runs-list with text set to the skill's domain, or just scan the newest runs and filter to its skill_name. The end-of-run summary on each run is the scout's own account of what it looked at and decided.
4. Read what it remembered — scratchpad-search (see below). The memory entries a scout wrote reveal the baselines and noise it has internalized about this project.

Workflow: read recent runs

signals-scout-runs-list returns the most recent runs across the whole fleet, newest first (capped at 100). Use it to answer "what happened lately?"

• Scope to a window with date_from / date_to (ISO-8601; inclusive lower, exclusive upper on created_at). Walk backwards by passing an earlier date_to.
• Search summaries with text — a case-insensitive substring match on each run's end-of-run summary. This is how the headless scout dedupes, and it's how you find "did any run already look at the checkout error spike?"
• Filter by emit outcome with emitted — emitted=true returns only runs that surfaced at least one finding, emitted=false only the quiet runs. This is the direct way to answer "which runs actually emitted something?" without parsing prose.

Each summary row carries run_id, skill_name, skill_version, status, started_at, completed_at, emitted_count (how many findings the run emitted), emitted_finding_ids (their ids), task_url (a deep-link into the Tasks UI for the full transcript), and the summary prose. Lead with the summary when narrating to the user — it's the scout's own plain-language close-out — and always offer the task_url for the full reasoning.

Workflow: drill into a single run

When the user wants the full story of one run (or pastes a run id / Tasks URL):

signals-scout-runs-retrieve
{ "id": "<uuid>" }

Note the field name flip: runs-list returns each run's id as run_id, but runs-retrieve takes it as id. Pass the run_id value through as id.

Returns the full run: status, started_at / completed_at (compute duration from these), skill_name / skill_version (what ran, at what body version), the end-of-run summary, emitted_count / emitted_finding_ids, and task_url. The transcript — the actual tool calls and reasoning — lives in the Tasks UI behind task_url, not in this payload; hand the user that link when they want to see every step. A failed run returns an empty summary and no error field — the payload looks the same as the list row, so to learn why it failed you need the transcript.

You don't have to open the UI for that: tasks-runs-session-logs-retrieve returns the run's session log (every tool call, message, and reasoning step) as data — handy when you're diagnosing a failure or want to trace exactly what a run did without leaving the conversation. Pass the run's task_run_id as id and its task_id (both are on the run row).

The raw stream is large (hundreds of KB to a few MB) and will overflow inline, so fetch it with call --json and let it spill to a file, then run it through scripts/render_run_report.py rather than parsing it by hand.

⚠️ Do not reach for exclude_types: "tool_call_update,…" to slim it down. It is tempting — the stream is dominated by incremental tool_call_update chunks — but each tool's actual input lives only in those chunks: the base tool_call event carries an empty rawInput, and the streamed updates build the input (and the final rawOutput) token by token. Excluding them leaves you with tool names but no idea what the scout actually queried. Fetch the full log and let the script reassemble each call (it groups by toolCallId, keeps the richest rawInput, and attaches the completion's rawOutput/status).

Whether a run emitted is a first-class field: emitted_count. emitted_count > 0 means the run surfaced that many findings; emitted_count: 0 means it closed out empty. Don't parse the prose summary for this any more — a phrase like "already emitted P1 … did not re-emit" describes a prior run, so substring-matching the summary for "emitted" is unreliable, whereas emitted_count is the authoritative tally. emitted_finding_ids lists the finding_ids behind that count, in emit order; each maps to a Signal with source_id = run:<run_id>:finding:<finding_id>, giving a reliable run → finding link. See references/scout-data-model.md for the run-to-finding link and how an emitted finding rides through grouping into the source_product: "signals_scout" inbox filter.

A run with status complete and an empty-handed summary ("surface at baseline, nothing to emit") is a healthy outcome, not a failure — most runs should close out empty. Treat a stream of empty close-outs as the fleet doing its job, not as the fleet being broken.

Workflow: inspect what the fleet has learned

The scratchpad is the fleet's durable, per-team memory — prose entries scouts write so future runs get smarter and quieter. Reading it tells you what the fleet believes about this project.

signals-scout-scratchpad-search
{ "text": "error_tracking" }

Returns entries newest-first (capped at 100); text matches content and key case-insensitively. Omit text to browse everything. Each entry's key carries a category prefix that tells you what kind of learning it is:

Prefix	Meaning
pattern:	A baseline — how this team's data normally shapes
watch:	A live issue being tracked but still below the emit bar
noise:	A pattern the fleet has decided to ignore (dev-only, single-user…)
addressed:	Something the team fixed or moved on from
dedupe:	A gate on re-emitting a specific issue / fingerprint / finding
allowlist:	Vetted entities never to re-surface
not-in-use:	A product/surface this team doesn't use (close-out memo)
mcp-gap:	A tooling gap a scout noticed worth raising later

This is the common vocabulary, not a closed set — scouts coin their own prefixes and <domain> labels as needed (the live fleet uses watch: heavily, for example), so treat an unfamiliar prefix as just another category. Entries cross-reference each other with [[key]] wikilinks. Keys follow <prefix>:<domain>:<entity> (e.g. dedupe:error_tracking:019e8375-…).

When a user asks "why isn't my scout flagging X anymore?", search the scratchpad for noise:, addressed:, dedupe:, and allowlist: entries — the fleet may have deliberately learned to suppress it. The canonical prefix vocabulary and the four-state dedupe classifier the fleet reasons in terms of are documented in the authoring-signals-scouts skill (references/dedupe-and-memory.md).

Workflow: list what scouts have actually emitted

"What has the fleet emitted lately / show me every finding my scouts produced." The run row carries no emit flag and no finding count, the prose summary is heuristic, and the inbox filter (below) is lossy because grouping merges scout findings into mixed-source clusters. The authoritative per-finding record is the emitted signal itself, in the document_embeddings table — queryable for any team via execute-sql (the general path). When a scout emits, emit_signal writes a signal with source_product="signals_scout"; the scout's attribution (skill_name, finding_id, severity, confidence) lands in metadata.extra, with weight and source_id at the top level.

Fetch with execute-sql and format with scripts/emitted_signals.py — the exact query lives in the script's header. One row per finding, filterable by any set of scouts:

#   call --json execute-sql { "truncate": false, "query": "<the emitted-signals query>" }  -> emitted.txt
python scripts/emitted_signals.py --signals emitted.txt --now <ISO> [--skill mcp-feedback,general]

A row here is ground truth that a finding persisted — it cleared every emit gate. The flip side matters when explaining a gap: a scout can narrate "EMITTED ..." in its summary yet have the emit silently dropped by a preflight gate (dry-run at the time, the org hasn't approved AI processing, or the signals_scout source is disabled), or the emit failed. Those never reach this table, so a claimed-but-absent finding is itself a diagnostic, not a script bug. The emit contract behind each row (weight vs. confidence rubrics, severity, dedupe) is documented in the authoring-signals-scouts skill (references/emit-contract.md); the run → finding link and its limits are in references/scout-data-model.md.

Workflow: see what scouts have surfaced

Scout findings reach the user as inbox reports. Filter the inbox to the scout source:

inbox-reports-list
{ "source_product": "signals_scout", "limit": 20 }

This is the direct way to find scout-backed reports. Each finding is emitted with source_product="signals_scout", that tag rides through grouping into the report's signal metadata, and the inbox filter keeps any report whose contributing signals include signals_scout — so the result is the set of reports the fleet has surfaced.

An empty result means the fleet hasn't emitted (yet), not that the filter is broken. Scouts hold a high bar — most runs close out without emitting — so on a quiet or newly enrolled project zero scout-backed reports is the normal, expected state. For the per-run view of what emitted, work from the runs instead: signals-scout-runs-list?emitted=true lists every emitting run, and each run's emitted_count / emitted_finding_ids tell you how many and which findings it produced (each finding_id maps to a Signal with source_id = run:<run_id>:finding:<finding_id>). To browse the inbox more broadly, use the inbox-exploration skill (statuses, suggested reviewers, drilling into a report's underlying signals). The emit contract behind each finding — weight, confidence, severity, the description prose — is documented in the authoring-signals-scouts skill (references/emit-contract.md).

Workflow: assess health and performance

"Is my scout actually working / earning its cost?" There's no single metric — judge a scout over a window of runs. Pull the runs (runs-list with a date_from), then reason across the dimensions below. The full playbook, including how to read each signal and the common failure modes, is in references/assessing-performance.md.

• Cadence adherence — are runs landing roughly every run_interval_minutes? Large gaps mean the coordinator is skipping it (disabled, drained from the flag, or capped out on busy ticks) — or it's dispatching but the runs aren't materializing. Tell the two apart with last_run_at: if the config's last_run_at is also stale, the coordinator stopped planning it; if last_run_at is fresh but the newest run row is hours old, it's the dispatch-vs-execution divergence above (workers backed up / down, or runs stranded), which runs-list alone hides.
• Success rate — how many runs reach a clean status vs. error out? A run of errors is a broken scout, not a quiet one.
• Emit rate — what fraction of runs emitted vs. closed out empty. Read it straight off emitted_count per run (or split the window with runs-list?emitted=true / ?emitted=false). Near-zero over a long window on a live surface can mean the discriminator is too strict (or the surface really is quiet); near-100% usually means it's too noisy. Most healthy scouts emit rarely.
• Signal-to-noise — of what it emitted, how much became actionable inbox reports vs. got suppressed? Use each emitting run's emitted_finding_ids to tie runs to their Signal rows, and cross-check against inbox-reports-list report states.
• Memory growth — a healthy scout accumulates pattern: / noise: / dedupe: entries over time. A scout with an empty scratchpad after many runs isn't learning.

Helper scripts

The skill bundles four pure formatters under scripts/ for the most common asks. They do no network I/O — they are the back half of an "agent fetches, script formats" split. The pattern is always the same:

1. Fetch each payload with the MCP using call --json (raw JSON, not the pretty text format) and save it to a file. For the big ones (runs-list, tasks-runs-session-logs-retrieve) this is mandatory anyway — they overflow inline and spill to a file you can point the script at.
2. Run the script over those files.

All four are stdlib-only Python 3.11+ and print plain text to stdout (or --out) — designed to read well in a terminal, so save them as .txt.

scripts/render_run_report.py — drill into one run

Produces the kind of detailed write-up you'd want when inspecting a single run: header (status, duration, posture), a narrated timeline that interleaves the agent's narration with each tool call and its real input, the end-of-run summary, and any scratchpad memory.

# fetch (note --json), saving each to a file:
#   call --json signals-scout-runs-retrieve { "id": "<run_id>" }            -> run.json
#   call --json tasks-runs-session-logs-retrieve { "id": "<task_run_id>", "task_id": "<task_id>", "offset": 0 }  -> log.json   (FULL — no exclude_types)
#   (optional) call --json signals-scout-scratchpad-search { ... }          -> mem.json
#   (optional) call --json signals-scout-config-list {}                     -> cfg.json
python scripts/render_run_report.py --run run.json --log log.json \
    --scratchpad mem.json --config cfg.json --out report.txt

Modes (--mode, default detailed):

Mode	Contains	--log needed?
summary	header + posture + close-out prose	no
detailed	+ narrated timeline with tool inputs + tool tally + scratchpad	yes
full	+ each tool call's (truncated) output inline	yes

Other flags: --show-output (outputs in detailed mode), --input-width / --output-width (truncation), --no-art (skip the hedgehog banner), --base-url (defaults to us.posthog.com).

scripts/fleet_survey.py — survey the whole fleet

One scannable table — scout, enabled, posture, cadence, last run, last outcome — with a "worth a look" section that flags never-run, stuck-in-dry-run, and last-run-failed scouts.

#   call --json signals-scout-config-list {}                 -> cfg.json
#   (optional) call --json signals-scout-runs-list { "limit": 30 }  -> runs.json   (small limit!)
python scripts/fleet_survey.py --config cfg.json --runs runs.json --now <current-ISO-time>

Pass --now (the current time, ISO-8601) to get relative "ago" columns; the emit/quiet column is a heuristic on each run's summary prose — confirm against the summary before trusting it.

scripts/assess_health.py — health over a window of runs

Implements the "assess health and performance" workflow above: a per-scout table (runs, success %, emit %, cadence gap vs interval, adherence, median duration, memory growth) plus a "worth a look" section flagging all-failed scouts, timeout-shaped failures, cadence stalls, staleness, and empty scratchpads.

#   call --json signals-scout-runs-list { "limit": 100, "date_from": "<ISO>" }  -> runs.json
#   (optional) call --json signals-scout-config-list {}                          -> cfg.json
#   (optional) call --json signals-scout-scratchpad-search {}                    -> mem.json
python scripts/assess_health.py --runs runs.json --config cfg.json \
    --scratchpad mem.json --now <current-ISO-time> [--skill signals-scout-general]

--config is what lets it score cadence adherence (the expected interval) and staleness (the authoritative last_run_at, which the windowed runs can miss when the 100-row cap truncates the newest runs). Without --scratchpad the memory column shows n/a and no memory flags fire. The emit % is the same summary-prose heuristic — cross-check signal-to-noise against inbox-reports-list.

scripts/emitted_signals.py — every finding the fleet actually emitted

Implements the "list what scouts have actually emitted" workflow: the authoritative per-finding table (when, scout, severity, weight, confidence, finding_id, one-line hypothesis) plus a per-scout rollup (emit count, severity mix, weight range, latest emit). Unlike assess_health's emit % — a prose heuristic — this reads the emitted signals directly, so it's exact.

Its input is not a signals-scout-* tool; it's an execute-sql result over document_embeddings (the general, any-team path). The full query lives in the script's header — copy it verbatim. execute-sql returns a pipe-delimited text table (even under call --json it's that text wrapped in a JSON string), so the script parses that text; the query deliberately selects only pipe-safe scalar columns (the multi-line description is excluded, hypothesis is sanitized).

#   call --json execute-sql { "truncate": false, "query": "<emitted-signals query from the header>" }  -> emitted.txt
python scripts/emitted_signals.py --signals emitted.txt --now <current-ISO-time> \
    [--skill mcp-feedback,general] [--severity P0,P1,P2] [--since <ISO>] [--sort weight] [--wide]

--skill takes a comma-separated set (the signals-scout- prefix is optional). --wide adds the scout_run_id so you can chain straight into render_run_report.py for the run that emitted a finding. Remember the coverage caveat: this lists signals that persisted — a finding a run summary claims but that's absent here was gated (dry-run / AI processing not approved / source disabled) or failed.

Tips

• Always surface the emit posture. "Running but in dry-run" is the single most common reason a user thinks a scout is broken when it isn't.
• An empty close-out is success. Most runs should find nothing. Don't report a wall of clean, empty runs as a problem.
• Emit-vs-quiet is a first-class run field. Filter runs directly with runs-list?emitted=true (or read emitted_count per run) to find what emitted, without parsing the prose summary. The source_product: "signals_scout" inbox filter lists the reports the fleet surfaced; an empty result there means it hasn't emitted yet (scouts hold a high bar), not that the filter is broken.
• A ~30-min run that failed is usually a timeout, not a broken scout. Completed runs finish in a couple of minutes. Most often the scout over-investigated and ran the full budget (the fleet self-corrects by writing "tight-run recipe" scratchpad entries) — but some are false timeouts where the scout actually finished in a few minutes and the run then hung on a dropped close-out. The session log (above) tells them apart: real over-investigation shows tool calls right up to the wall; a false timeout goes silent long before it. Don't assume over-investigation from duration alone.
• Lead with the run summary, then offer task_url for the full transcript — don't dump raw run rows at the user.
• last_run_at: null means a scout has never fired — check it's enabled and the project is enrolled before digging further.
• To explain a quiet scout, read the project profile. signals-scout-project-profile-get shows whether the surface it watches is even in use — a logs scout on a project with no logs has nothing to do.
• This skill is read-only. To change a scout's schedule, posture, or body, hand off to the authoring-signals-scouts skill — it covers signals-scout-config-update and the skills-store edit path.