| name | spec-kitty-mission-system |
| description | Understand how Spec Kitty missions work: the 4 built-in mission types, how they define workflows via step contracts and action indices, how missions and work packages relate, how templates are resolved through the 5-tier chain, and how doctrine artifacts (procedures, tactics, directives) compose mission behavior. Triggers: "what missions are available", "how do missions work", "which mission should I use", "explain the mission system", "what is a mission", "change the mission", "mission templates", "step contracts", "action index", "mission procedures". Does NOT handle: runtime loop advancement (use runtime-next), setup or repair (use setup-doctor), governance (use charter-doctrine), or glossary curation (use glossary-context). |
spec-kitty-mission-system
Understand how missions structure work in Spec Kitty. A mission is a
domain-specific workflow blueprint that defines what phases you go through,
what templates agents see, what artifacts you produce, and how to validate
success.
How Missions Work
The Core Concept
A mission answers: "What process should we follow to achieve this goal?"
Different goals need different processes. Building a software component is
different from conducting research or writing documentation. Each mission
provides domain-appropriate:
- Steps — the ordered phases of work (specify → plan → implement → review)
- Templates — prompts that tell agents what to do at each step
- Artifacts — expected outputs (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md)
- Guards — conditions that must be met before advancing (e.g., spec.md must exist before planning)
- Validation — checks that verify the output quality
- Agent context — personality and instructions for the AI agent
The Hierarchy: Mission Type → Mission → Work Package → Workspace
Mission Type (e.g., software-dev)
└── Mission (kitty-specs/042-auth-system/)
├── meta.json ← links mission to mission type + target branch
├── spec.md ← what we're building
├── plan.md ← how we'll build it
├── tasks.md ← WP breakdown
└── tasks/
├── WP01.md ← work package prompt
├── WP02.md
└── WP03.md
└── Workspace (.worktrees/042-auth-system-lane-b/)
- Mission Type = the workflow blueprint (reusable across missions)
- Mission = a concrete thing you're building, linked to a mission type via
meta.json
- Work Package (WP) = one parallelizable slice of work within a mission
- Workspace = an isolated git worktree owned by one execution lane
meta.json (Mission → Mission Type Link)
Every mission has a meta.json that records which mission type it uses:
{
"feature_number": "042",
"slug": "042-auth-system",
"mission": "software-dev",
"target_branch": "<target-branch>",
"created_at": "2026-03-22T10:00:00Z",
"vcs": "git"
}
The mission field determines which templates, guards, and validation rules
apply. Default is software-dev if omitted.
The 4 Built-In Mission Types
software-dev (default)
Full software development lifecycle with work packages and code review.
Steps:
discovery → specify → plan → tasks_outline → tasks_packages → tasks_finalize → implement → review → accept
Required artifacts: spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md
Guards:
specify → plan: spec.md must exist
plan → implement: plan.md and tasks.md must exist
implement → review: all WPs must be approved or done
review → accept: review must be approved
Agent context: TDD practices, library-first architecture, tests before code.
Use when: Building components, fixing bugs, refactoring code — any work that
produces code changes.
research
Systematic research with evidence-gated transitions.
Steps (state machine):
scoping → methodology → gathering → synthesis → output → done
↑ │
└── gather_more (loop back)
Required artifacts: spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, findings.md
Guards:
scoping → methodology: scope document must exist
methodology → gathering: methodology plan must exist
gathering → synthesis: at least 3 sources documented
synthesis → output: findings document must exist
output → done: publication approved
Special: The gathering → synthesis → gathering loop allows iterative
evidence collection. Source tracking in source-register.csv, evidence in
evidence-log.csv.
Use when: Investigating technologies, conducting literature reviews,
evaluating options, any work requiring structured evidence gathering.
plan
Goal-oriented planning with iterative refinement.
Steps:
specify → research → plan → review
Use when: Planning a project, designing architecture, creating roadmaps —
any work that produces planning artifacts but not code.
documentation
Documentation creation following the Divio 4-type system.
Workflow phases:
discover → audit → design → generate → validate → publish
Required artifacts: spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, gap-analysis.md
Divio types: Tutorial (learning-oriented), How-To (task-oriented),
Reference (information-oriented), Explanation (understanding-oriented).
Special: Supports auto-generation via JSDoc, Sphinx, or rustdoc. Gap
analysis identifies missing documentation by classifying existing docs and
finding coverage gaps.
Use when: Creating docs for a project, filling documentation gaps,
documenting a specific component or API.
Mission Type Definition Files
Each mission type lives in src/doctrine/missions/{mission-key}/ with:
mission-runtime.yaml (Runtime DAG)
Defines steps as a directed acyclic graph with dependencies:
mission:
key: software-dev
name: Software Dev Kitty
version: "2.1.0"
steps:
- id: specify
title: Specification
depends_on: [discovery]
prompt_template: specify.md
description: Define user scenarios and acceptance criteria
- id: plan
depends_on: [specify]
prompt_template: plan.md
- id: implement
depends_on: [tasks_finalize]
prompt_template: implement.md
This is what spec-kitty next uses to determine step ordering.
mission.yaml (Configuration + State Machine)
Contains both v0 configuration (artifacts, validation, agent context) and
v1 state machine definitions (states, transitions, guards):
v0 fields (configuration):
name: "Software Dev Kitty"
domain: "software"
artifacts:
required: [spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md]
optional: [data-model.md, quickstart.md]
workflow:
phases:
- name: "research"
- name: "implement"
- name: "review"
agent_context: |
You are a software development agent following TDD practices.
mcp_tools:
required: [filesystem, git]
recommended: [code-search, test-runner]
validation:
checks: [git_clean, all_tests_pass, kanban_complete]
v1 fields (state machine):
initial: discovery
states:
- name: discovery
- name: specify
- name: plan
- name: implement
- name: review
- name: done
transitions:
- trigger: advance
source: specify
dest: plan
conditions:
- 'artifact_exists("spec.md")'
guards:
has_spec:
description: "Specification document must exist"
check: 'artifact_exists("spec.md")'
command-templates/ (Agent Prompts)
Markdown files shown to agents at each step:
specify.md — Instructions for writing the specification
plan.md — Instructions for creating the implementation plan
implement.md — Instructions for implementing a work package
review.md — Instructions for reviewing a work package
accept.md — Instructions for final acceptance validation
templates/ (Content Templates)
Scaffolding files for artifacts:
spec-template.md — Starting structure for spec.md
plan-template.md — Starting structure for plan.md
task-prompt-template.md — Starting structure for WP prompt files
tasks-template.md — Starting structure for tasks.md
Doctrine Composition Layer
Missions are backed by structured doctrine artifacts that define action
behavior and link to reusable knowledge.
MissionStepContract (Action Contracts)
Each public action (specify, plan, implement, review) has a step contract
that defines its internal structure:
id: implement
action: implement
mission: software-dev
schema_version: "1.0"
steps:
- id: setup-workspace
description: "Create or enter the WP workspace"
- id: implement-code
description: "Write code following governance constraints"
delegates_to:
kind: tactic
candidates: [tdd-red-green-refactor, zombies-tdd]
- id: validate
description: "Run tests and lint checks"
The delegates_to field links a step to doctrine artifacts. This is how
mission behavior connects to the knowledge layer: the contract says what
to do, the referenced tactic/directive/procedure says how.
Procedure (Reusable Workflow Primitives)
Procedures are multi-step doctrine artifacts with prerequisites and ordered
steps. They are the reusable building blocks that step contracts delegate to.
Each procedure describes a complete mini-workflow (e.g., a refactoring
sequence, a test-first bug fix, a situational assessment).
Procedures live in src/doctrine/procedures/shipped/ (shipped) or
.kittify/procedures/ (project-local). Access via DoctrineService:
procedure = service.procedures.get("refactoring")
spec-kitty doctrine list --kind procedure
Agent Profiles (Role-Based WP Assignment)
Agent profiles define roles, specializations, and boundaries for work
package assignment. Each profile has 6 sections: context_sources, purpose,
specialization (languages, frameworks, boundaries), collaboration (handoffs,
outputs), mode_defaults, and initialization_declaration.
Profiles form a hierarchy via specializes_from — a language-specific
profile inherits from a general implementer profile, adding language-scoped
capabilities. The DDR-011 algorithm resolves which profile best matches a
given task context based on weighted signals (language, framework,
file-pattern, keyword, exact-id).
The mission.yaml task_types section maps WP actions to agent roles:
task_types:
implement:
agent_role: implementer
review:
agent_role: reviewer
plan:
agent_role: planner
spec-kitty agent profile list
spec-kitty agent profile show <profile-id>
spec-kitty agent profile hierarchy
Action Indices (Doctrine Scoping)
Each mission action has an index that declares which doctrine artifacts are
relevant to that step:
action: implement
directives: [TEST_FIRST]
tactics: [tdd-red-green-refactor, zombies-tdd, acceptance-test-first]
styleguides: [python-implementation]
toolguides: []
procedures: [implementation-handoff]
The charter context builder uses these indices to scope what gets
injected into the agent prompt at each step. This prevents agents from
seeing review-scoped doctrine during implementation and vice versa.
6 Guard Primitives
Guards block step transitions until conditions are met:
| Guard | Syntax | What it checks |
|---|
artifact_exists | artifact_exists("spec.md") | File exists in mission dir |
gate_passed | gate_passed("review_approved") | Event exists in mission event log |
all_wp_status | all_wp_status("approved_or_done") | Every WP is in the specified lane, or in any lane in a named accepted-ready set |
any_wp_status | any_wp_status("for_review") | At least one WP is in the lane |
input_provided | input_provided("architecture") | Input was provided to runtime |
event_count | event_count("source_documented", 3) | Minimum event count in log |
Guards are composed as conditions lists on transitions. All conditions in the
list must pass for the transition to fire.
Template Resolution (5-Tier Chain)
When a command template is needed, spec-kitty searches 5 locations in order:
| Tier | Path | Purpose |
|---|
| 1. Override | .kittify/overrides/command-templates/ | Project customization |
| 2. Legacy | .kittify/command-templates/ | Deprecated pre-migration |
| 3. Global Mission | ~/.kittify/missions/{mission}/command-templates/ | User global |
| 4. Global | ~/.kittify/command-templates/ | User global fallback |
| 5. Package | src/doctrine/missions/{mission}/command-templates/ | Built-in default |
First match wins. Override a template by placing your version in
.kittify/overrides/command-templates/. The package default is always the
fallback.
Content templates (templates/) follow the same 5-tier resolution.
Selecting a Mission Type
The mission type is set when you create a mission with /spec-kitty.specify.
It's recorded in meta.json and cannot be changed after creation.
Commands:
spec-kitty list-missions
spec-kitty specify --mission research "What are the best auth patterns?"
cat kitty-specs/<mission-slug>/meta.json | jq .mission
Decision guide:
| If you're... | Use mission type |
|---|
| Building a component, fixing a bug, refactoring | software-dev |
| Investigating, evaluating options, literature review | research |
| Planning architecture, roadmaps, design docs | plan |
| Writing tutorials, API docs, how-to guides | documentation |
The Two State Machines
Missions involve two orthogonal state machines:
Mission-type state — which phase of the workflow are we in?
discovery → specify → plan → tasks → implement → review → accept → merge
Managed by mission-runtime.yaml DAG and spec-kitty next.
WP status — where is each work package in its lifecycle?
planned → claimed → in_progress → for_review → in_review → approved → done
↕
blocked / canceled
Managed by the status model (append-only event log).
Together they determine what spec-kitty next returns: "we're in the implement
phase, WP01 is done, WP02 is in_progress, WP03 is planned — your next action
is implement WP03."
Runtime Bootstrap
On every CLI invocation, ensure_runtime() runs:
- Checks
~/.kittify/cache/version.lock — if version matches, fast path (< 100ms)
- If stale: copies mission files from installed package to
~/.kittify/missions/
- Uses file locking to prevent concurrent corruption
This ensures ~/.kittify/ always matches the installed spec-kitty version.
References
references/mission-comparison-matrix.md -- Side-by-side comparison of all 4 mission types