name	adr-review
description	Review code changes against accepted ADRs for compliance violations
argument-hint	[--branch BRANCH]
allowed-tools	mcp__claude-flow__agentdb_hierarchical-query mcp__claude-flow__agentdb_causal-query mcp__claude-flow__memory_search Bash Read Grep Glob

ADR Review

Review code changes against accepted Architecture Decision Records to detect violations, drift, and non-compliance.

When to use

Before merging a PR, after significant code changes, or as part of a periodic compliance check. Use this to ensure code changes respect the architectural decisions the team has agreed upon.

Steps

Get diff -- Run git diff main...HEAD --name-only (or the specified branch) to list changed files. Then run git diff main...HEAD to get the full diff content.
Find relevant ADRs -- For each changed file:
- Grep the file for ADR references (ADR-\d+)
- Grep docs/adr/ for ADRs that mention the changed file paths or modules
- Call mcp__claude-flow__memory_search with the file path and change summary to find semantically related ADRs
Load ADR content -- Read each relevant ADR file. Focus on:
- The Decision section (what was decided)
- The Status (only enforce "accepted" ADRs)
- The Consequences (expected constraints)
Check for violations -- Analyze each changed file against its relevant ADRs:
- Does the code change contradict an accepted decision?
- Does it use a technology/pattern that an ADR explicitly rejected?
- Does it modify a module in a way the ADR's consequences warned against?
- Is the code referencing a deprecated or superseded ADR?
Query relationship graph -- Call mcp__claude-flow__agentdb_causal-query to check if any referenced ADRs have been superseded. If so, flag that the code references an outdated decision.

Report -- Present findings as a compliance report:

## ADR Compliance Report

### Violations
- [ ] <file>:<line> — violates ADR-NNN: <reason>

### Warnings
- [!] <file> references superseded ADR-NNN (replaced by ADR-MMM)

### Compliant
- [x] <file> — consistent with ADR-NNN

### Unlinked Changes
- [?] <file> — no ADR coverage (consider creating one)

Suggest actions -- For each violation, suggest whether to update the code or propose a new ADR to supersede the violated one.

المزيد من هذا المستودع

نفس المستودع

nested-subagents

ruvnet/ruflo

Spawn nested sub-agents (agents that spawn sub-agents, up to depth=5) via Claude Code's native Task tool — for context-managed deep delegation

2026-06-0959.5k

workflow-create

ruvnet/ruflo

Author a workflow — either an MCP workflow template (persisted, lifecycle) or a native .claude/workflows/*.js orchestration script (agent/parallel/pipeline fan-out)

2026-05-2959.5k

workflow-run

ruvnet/ruflo

Run a workflow — drive an MCP workflow lifecycle (execute/pause/resume/cancel) or invoke + resume a native .claude/workflows/*.js orchestration via the Workflow tool

2026-05-2959.5k

gaia-architecture-comparison

ruvnet/ruflo

Side-by-side comparison of ruflo vs HAL vs other GAIA harnesses — capability gaps, design decisions, and improvement roadmap

2026-05-2859.5k

gaia-debugging

ruvnet/ruflo

Diagnose why a GAIA question failed — extract trace, classify failure mode, and propose a fix

2026-05-2859.5k

gaia-submission

ruvnet/ruflo

Walk through a complete GAIA benchmark→submit flow — from key resolution through HAL-compatible package generation

2026-05-2859.5k

ADR Review

Review code changes against accepted Architecture Decision Records to detect violations, drift, and non-compliance.

When to use

Before merging a PR, after significant code changes, or as part of a periodic compliance check. Use this to ensure code changes respect the architectural decisions the team has agreed upon.

Steps

Get diff -- Run git diff main...HEAD --name-only (or the specified branch) to list changed files. Then run git diff main...HEAD to get the full diff content.

Find relevant ADRs -- For each changed file:

Grep the file for ADR references (ADR-\d+)
Grep docs/adr/ for ADRs that mention the changed file paths or modules
Call mcp__claude-flow__memory_search with the file path and change summary to find semantically related ADRs

Load ADR content -- Read each relevant ADR file. Focus on:

The Decision section (what was decided)
The Status (only enforce "accepted" ADRs)
The Consequences (expected constraints)

Check for violations -- Analyze each changed file against its relevant ADRs:

Does the code change contradict an accepted decision?
Does it use a technology/pattern that an ADR explicitly rejected?
Does it modify a module in a way the ADR's consequences warned against?
Is the code referencing a deprecated or superseded ADR?

Query relationship graph -- Call mcp__claude-flow__agentdb_causal-query to check if any referenced ADRs have been superseded. If so, flag that the code references an outdated decision.

Report -- Present findings as a compliance report:

## ADR Compliance Report

### Violations
- [ ] <file>:<line> — violates ADR-NNN: <reason>

### Warnings
- [!] <file> references superseded ADR-NNN (replaced by ADR-MMM)

### Compliant
- [x] <file> — consistent with ADR-NNN

### Unlinked Changes
- [?] <file> — no ADR coverage (consider creating one)

Suggest actions -- For each violation, suggest whether to update the code or propose a new ADR to supersede the violated one.