بنقرة واحدة
paper-figure
// Generate publication-quality figures and tables from experiment results. Use when user says "画图", "作图", "generate figures", "paper figures", or needs plots for a paper.
// Generate publication-quality figures and tables from experiment results. Use when user says "画图", "作图", "generate figures", "paper figures", or needs plots for a paper.
Autonomously improve a generated paper via GPT-5.5 xhigh review → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says "改论文", "improve paper", "论文润色循环", "auto improve", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.
Workflow 1.5: Bridge between idea discovery and auto review. Reads EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md, implements experiment code, deploys to GPU, collects initial results. Use when user says "实现实验", "implement experiments", "bridge", "从计划到跑实验", "deploy the plan", or has an experiment plan ready to execute.
Draft a structured grant proposal from research ideas and literature. Supports KAKENHI (Japan), NSF (US), NSFC (China, including 面上/青年/优青/杰青/海外优青/重点), ERC (EU), DFG (Germany), SNSF (Switzerland), ARC (Australia), NWO (Netherlands), and generic formats. Use when user says "write grant", "grant proposal", "申請書", "write KAKENHI", "科研費", "基金申请", "写基金", "NSF proposal", or wants to turn research ideas into a funding application.
Workflow 1: Full idea discovery pipeline. Orchestrates research-lit → idea-creator → novelty-check → research-review → research-refine-pipeline to go from a broad research direction to validated, pilot-tested ideas. Use when user says "找idea全流程", "idea discovery pipeline", "从零开始找方向", or wants the complete idea exploration workflow.
Analyze ARIS usage logs and propose optimizations to SKILL.md files, reviewer prompts, and workflow defaults. Outer-loop harness optimization inspired by Meta-Harness (Lee et al., 2026). Use when user says "优化技能", "meta optimize", "improve skills", "分析使用记录", or wants to optimize ARIS's own harness components based on accumulated experience.
Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with NO prior context to prevent confirmation bias. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.
| name | paper-figure |
| description | Generate publication-quality figures and tables from experiment results. Use when user says "画图", "作图", "generate figures", "paper figures", or needs plots for a paper. |
| argument-hint | ["figure-plan-or-data-path"] |
| allowed-tools | Bash(*), Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, mcp__codex__codex, mcp__codex__codex-reply |
Generate all figures and tables for a paper based on: $ARGUMENTS
| Category | Can auto-generate? | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Data-driven plots | ✅ Yes | Line plots (training curves), bar charts (method comparison), scatter plots, heatmaps, box/violin plots |
| Comparison tables | ✅ Yes | LaTeX tables comparing prior bounds, method features, ablation results |
| Multi-panel figures | ✅ Yes | Subfigure grids combining multiple plots (e.g., 3×3 dataset × method) |
| Architecture/pipeline diagrams | ❌ No — manual | Model architecture, data flow diagrams, system overviews. At best can generate a rough TikZ skeleton, but expect to draw these yourself using tools like draw.io, Figma, or TikZ |
| Generated image grids | ❌ No — manual | Grids of generated samples (e.g., GAN/diffusion outputs). These come from running your model, not from this skill |
| Photographs / screenshots | ❌ No — manual | Real-world images, UI screenshots, qualitative examples |
In practice: For a typical ML paper, this skill handles ~60% of figures (all data plots + tables). The remaining ~40% (hero figure, architecture diagram, qualitative results) need to be created manually and placed in figures/ before running /paper-write. The skill will detect these as "existing figures" and preserve them.
publication — Visual style preset. Options: publication (default, clean for print), poster (larger fonts), slide (bold colors)pdf — Output format. Options: pdf (vector, best for LaTeX), png (raster fallback)tab10 — Default matplotlib color cycle. Options: tab10, Set2, colorblind (deuteranopia-safe)figures/ — Output directory for generated figuresgpt-5.5 — Model used via Codex MCP for figure quality review./paper-plan)figures/ or project rootIf no PAPER_PLAN.md exists, scan for data files and ask the user which figures to generate.
Parse the Figure Plan table from PAPER_PLAN.md:
| ID | Type | Description | Data Source | Priority |
|----|------|-------------|-------------|----------|
| Fig 1 | Architecture | ... | manual | HIGH |
| Fig 2 | Line plot | ... | figures/exp.json | HIGH |
Identify:
Create a shared style configuration script:
# paper_plot_style.py — shared across all figure scripts
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib
matplotlib.rcParams.update({
'font.size': FONT_SIZE,
'font.family': 'serif',
'font.serif': ['Times New Roman', 'Times', 'DejaVu Serif'],
'axes.labelsize': FONT_SIZE,
'axes.titlesize': FONT_SIZE + 1,
'xtick.labelsize': FONT_SIZE - 1,
'ytick.labelsize': FONT_SIZE - 1,
'legend.fontsize': FONT_SIZE - 1,
'figure.dpi': DPI,
'savefig.dpi': DPI,
'savefig.bbox': 'tight',
'savefig.pad_inches': 0.05,
'axes.grid': False,
'axes.spines.top': False,
'axes.spines.right': False,
'text.usetex': False, # set True if LaTeX is available
'mathtext.fontset': 'stix',
})
# Color palette
COLORS = plt.cm.tab10.colors # or Set2, or colorblind-safe
def save_fig(fig, name, fmt=FORMAT):
"""Save figure to FIG_DIR with consistent naming."""
fig.savefig(f'{FIG_DIR}/{name}.{fmt}')
print(f'Saved: {FIG_DIR}/{name}.{fmt}')
Use this decision tree for data-driven figures (inspired by Imbad0202/academic-research-skills):
| Data Pattern | Recommended Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| X=time/steps, Y=metric | Line plot | 0.48\textwidth |
| Methods × 1 metric | Bar chart | 0.48\textwidth |
| Methods × multiple metrics | Grouped bar / radar | 0.95\textwidth |
| Two continuous variables | Scatter plot | 0.48\textwidth |
| Matrix / grid values | Heatmap | 0.48\textwidth |
| Distribution comparison | Box/violin plot | 0.48\textwidth |
| Multi-dataset results | Multi-panel (subfigure) | 0.95\textwidth |
| Prior work comparison | LaTeX table | — |
For each figure in the plan, create a standalone Python script:
Line plots (training curves, scaling):
# gen_fig2_training_curves.py
from paper_plot_style import *
import json
with open('figures/exp_results.json') as f:
data = json.load(f)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, 1, figsize=(5, 3.5))
ax.plot(data['steps'], data['fac_loss'], label='Factorized', color=COLORS[0])
ax.plot(data['steps'], data['crf_loss'], label='CRF-LR', color=COLORS[1])
ax.set_xlabel('Training Steps')
ax.set_ylabel('Cross-Entropy Loss')
ax.legend(frameon=False)
save_fig(fig, 'fig2_training_curves')
Bar charts (comparison, ablation):
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, 1, figsize=(5, 3))
methods = ['Baseline', 'Method A', 'Method B', 'Ours']
values = [82.3, 85.1, 86.7, 89.2]
bars = ax.bar(methods, values, color=[COLORS[i] for i in range(len(methods))])
ax.set_ylabel('Accuracy (%)')
# Add value labels on bars
for bar, val in zip(bars, values):
ax.text(bar.get_x() + bar.get_width()/2, bar.get_height() + 0.3,
f'{val:.1f}', ha='center', va='bottom', fontsize=FONT_SIZE-1)
save_fig(fig, 'fig3_comparison')
Comparison tables (LaTeX, for theory papers):
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Comparison of estimation error bounds. $n$: sample size, $D$: ambient dim, $d$: latent dim, $K$: subspaces, $n_k$: modes.}
\label{tab:bounds}
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\toprule
Method & Rate & Depends on $D$? & Multi-modal? \\
\midrule
\citet{MinimaxOkoAS23} & $n^{-s'/D}$ & Yes (curse) & No \\
\citet{ScoreMatchingdistributionrecovery} & $n^{-2/d}$ & No & No \\
\textbf{Ours} & $\sqrt{\sum n_k d_k / n}$ & No & Yes \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
Architecture/pipeline diagrams (MANUAL — outside this skill's scope):
figures/, preserve it and generate only the LaTeX \includegraphics snippet[MANUAL] in the figure plan and latex_includes.tex# Run all figure generation scripts
for script in gen_fig*.py; do
python "$script"
done
Verify all output files exist and are non-empty.
For each figure, output the LaTeX code to include it:
% === Fig 2: Training Curves ===
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{figures/fig2_training_curves.pdf}
\caption{Training curves comparing factorized and CRF-LR denoising.}
\label{fig:training_curves}
\end{figure}
Save all snippets to figures/latex_includes.tex for easy copy-paste into the paper.
Send figure descriptions and captions to GPT-5.5 for review:
mcp__codex__codex:
model: gpt-5.5
config: {"model_reasoning_effort": "xhigh"}
prompt: |
Review these figure/table plans for a [VENUE] submission.
For each figure:
1. Is the caption informative and self-contained?
2. Does the figure type match the data being shown?
3. Is the comparison fair and clear?
4. Any missing baselines or ablations?
5. Would a different visualization be more effective?
[list all figures with captions and descriptions]
Before finishing, verify each figure (from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow):
\caption{} (from pedrohcgs)emp_rate)plt.title for publications)figures/
├── paper_plot_style.py # shared style config
├── gen_fig1_architecture.py # per-figure scripts
├── gen_fig2_training_curves.py
├── gen_fig3_comparison.py
├── fig1_architecture.pdf # generated figures
├── fig2_training_curves.pdf
├── fig3_comparison.pdf
├── latex_includes.tex # LaTeX snippets for all figures
└── TABLE_*.tex # standalone table LaTeX files
| Type | When to Use | Typical Size |
|---|---|---|
| Line plot | Training curves, scaling trends | 0.48\textwidth |
| Bar chart | Method comparison, ablation | 0.48\textwidth |
| Grouped bar | Multi-metric comparison | 0.95\textwidth |
| Scatter plot | Correlation analysis | 0.48\textwidth |
| Heatmap | Attention, confusion matrix | 0.48\textwidth |
| Box/violin | Distribution comparison | 0.48\textwidth |
| Architecture | System overview | 0.95\textwidth |
| Multi-panel | Combined results (subfigures) | 0.95\textwidth |
| Comparison table | Prior bounds vs. ours (theory) | full width |
Design pattern (type × style matrix) inspired by baoyu-skills. Publication style defaults and figure rules from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow. Visualization decision tree from Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.