autopilot

name	autopilot
description	[OMX] Strict autonomous loop: $deep-interview -> $ralplan -> $ultragoal (+ $team if needed) -> $code-review -> $ultraqa

Autopilot is the strict autonomous delivery loop for non-trivial work. Its recommended/default contract is exactly:

$deep-interview -> $ralplan -> $ultragoal (+ $team if needed) -> $code-review -> $ultraqa

If $code-review or $ultraqa is not clean, Autopilot returns to $ralplan with the findings as the next planning input, then continues again through $ultragoal, $code-review, and $ultraqa until the gates are clean or a hard blocker is reported. Ralph is a legacy/explicit alternate execution loop only; do not advertise Ralph as the default Autopilot path.

<Use_When>

• User wants hands-off execution from a concrete idea, issue, PRD, or requirements artifact to reviewed and QA-checked code
• User says $autopilot, "autopilot", "auto pilot", "autonomous", "build me", "create me", "make me", "full auto", "handle it all", or "I want a/an..."
• Task needs clarification, planning, durable execution, verification, code review, and QA with automatic follow-up when gates are not clean </Use_When>

<Do_Not_Use_When>

• User wants to explore options or brainstorm -- use $plan / $ralplan
• User says "just explain", "draft only", or "what would you suggest" -- respond conversationally
• User wants a single focused code change -- use $ultragoal, $ralph only when explicitly requested, or direct executor work
• User wants only review/critique of existing code -- use $code-review </Do_Not_Use_When>

<Strict_Loop_Contract> Autopilot must not run a separate broad expansion/planning/execution/QA/validation lifecycle as its primary behavior. It delegates those concerns to the canonical workflow phases below:

1. Phase deep-interview — Socratic requirements clarification gate

   • Run or resume $deep-interview to clarify intent, scope, non-goals, constraints, and decision boundaries.
   • Required handoff artifact: a clarified spec or concise requirements summary suitable for $ralplan.

2. Phase ralplan — consensus planning gate

   • Ground the task with pre-context intake and the deep-interview artifact.
   • Run or resume $ralplan to produce/update PRD and test-spec artifacts.
   • PRD/test-spec files alone are not completion evidence. Ralplan may hand off only after durable consensus evidence records an Architect approval first and a subsequent Critic approval second.
   • When returning from a non-clean review or QA pass, include return_to_ralplan_reason and the findings as first-class planning input.
   • If either review is missing, blocked, out of order, or non-approving, remain in ralplan or report an explicit blocker/max-iteration outcome; do not progress to $ultragoal, $team, $ralph, or implementation.
   • Required handoff artifact: an approved plan/test spec plus ralplan_consensus_gate evidence suitable for $ultragoal.

3. Phase ultragoal — durable implementation + verification loop

   • Run $ultragoal from the approved ralplan artifacts.
   • Ultragoal owns durable Codex goal handoffs, .omx/ultragoal ledger checkpoints, implementation, tests, build/lint/typecheck evidence, cleanup, and final review gate discipline.
   • Use $team only inside an active Ultragoal story when the story clearly benefits from coordinated parallel execution (for example independent file/module lanes, broad test matrix work, or multi-domain implementation). Team remains explicit and leader-owned; Ultragoal keeps the goal/ledger state.
   • Required handoff artifact: implementation evidence, changed-file summary, verification evidence, and Ultragoal ledger/checkpoint references suitable for $code-review.

4. Phase code-review — merge-readiness gate

   • Run $code-review on the diff/artifacts produced by $ultragoal.
   • A clean review means final recommendation APPROVE with architectural status CLEAR.
   • COMMENT, REQUEST CHANGES, any architectural WATCH/BLOCK, or any unresolved finding is not clean.
   • If not clean, increment the review cycle, persist review_verdict, set return_to_ralplan_reason, and transition back to Phase ralplan.

5. Phase ultraqa — adversarial QA gate

   • Run $ultraqa after a clean code review when user-facing behavior, workflows, CLI/runtime behavior, integration surfaces, or regression risk warrant adversarial QA.
   • For docs-only or trivially non-runtime changes, record ultraqa as skipped with an explicit condition and evidence.
   • If UltraQA finds issues, persist the QA verdict/evidence, set return_to_ralplan_reason, and transition back to Phase ralplan.

The only normal terminal state is complete after clean code review and a passed or explicitly skipped UltraQA gate. Cancellation, blocked credentials, unrecoverable repeated failures, or explicit user stop may terminate earlier with preserved state. </Strict_Loop_Contract>

Before Phase `deep-interview` or `ralplan` starts or resumes: 1. Derive a task slug from the request. 2. Reuse the latest relevant `.omx/context/{slug}-*.md` snapshot when available. 3. If none exists, create `.omx/context/{slug}-{timestamp}.md` (UTC `YYYYMMDDTHHMMSSZ`) with: - task statement - desired outcome - known facts/evidence - constraints - unknowns/open questions - likely codebase touchpoints 4. If brownfield facts are missing, run `explore` first before or during `$deep-interview` (`$deep-interview --quick ` remains acceptable for bounded low-ambiguity intake); do not skip the clarification gate merely because the task sounds actionable. 5. Carry the snapshot path in Autopilot state and all handoff artifacts.

<Execution_Policy>

• Always execute the recommended phases in order: deep-interview, then ralplan, then ultragoal, then code-review, then ultraqa.
• $team is conditional and explicit: use it only within an Ultragoal story when parallel execution materially improves throughput, quality, or safety.
• Never skip directly from vague/freeform expansion to implementation; unclear input must be clarified and planned through $deep-interview and $ralplan.
• A non-clean $code-review or failed $ultraqa always returns to $ralplan; do not patch findings ad hoc outside the loop.
• Each phase must write/update Autopilot state before handing off.
• Use existing hooks, .omx/state, $deep-interview, $ralplan, $ultragoal, optional $team, $code-review, $ultraqa, and pipeline primitives; do not invent a separate execution framework.
• Preserve legacy compatibility: if a user explicitly requests the old Ralph execution lane, use $ralph as an intentional alternate execution phase, but do not present it as Autopilot's default recommended loop.
• Continue automatically through safe reversible phase transitions. Ask only for destructive, credential-gated, or materially preference-dependent branches.
• Apply the shared workflow guidance pattern: outcome-first framing, concise visible updates for multi-step execution, local overrides for the active workflow branch, validation proportional to risk, explicit stop rules, and automatic continuation for safe reversible steps. Ask only for material, destructive, credentialed, external-production, or preference-dependent branches. </Execution_Policy>

<State_Management> Use the CLI-first state surface (omx state ... --json) for Autopilot lifecycle state. State must be session-aware when a session id exists. If the explicit MCP compatibility surface is already available, equivalent omx_state tool calls remain acceptable but are not required.

Required fields:

{
  "mode": "autopilot",
  "active": true,
  "current_phase": "deep-interview",
  "iteration": 1,
  "review_cycle": 0,
  "max_iterations": 10,
  "phase_cycle": ["deep-interview", "ralplan", "ultragoal", "code-review", "ultraqa"],
  "handoff_artifacts": {
    "context_snapshot_path": ".omx/context/<slug>-<timestamp>.md",
    "deep_interview": null,
    "ralplan": null,
    "ralplan_consensus_gate": {
      "required": true,
      "sequence": ["architect-review", "critic-review"],
      "planning_artifacts_are_not_consensus": true,
      "required_review_roles": ["architect", "critic"],
      "ralplan_architect_review": null,
      "ralplan_critic_review": null,
      "complete": false
    },
    "ultragoal": null,
    "code_review": null,
    "ultraqa": null
  },
  "review_verdict": null,
  "qa_verdict": null,
  "return_to_ralplan_reason": null
}

• On start: omx state write --input '{"mode":"autopilot","active":true,"current_phase":"deep-interview","iteration":1,"review_cycle":0,"state":{"phase_cycle":["deep-interview","ralplan","ultragoal","code-review","ultraqa"],"handoff_artifacts":{"context_snapshot_path":"<snapshot-path>","deep_interview":null,"ralplan":null,"ralplan_consensus_gate":{"required":true,"sequence":["architect-review","critic-review"],"planning_artifacts_are_not_consensus":true,"required_review_roles":["architect","critic"],"ralplan_architect_review":null,"ralplan_critic_review":null,"complete":false},"ultragoal":null,"code_review":null,"ultraqa":null},"review_verdict":null,"qa_verdict":null,"return_to_ralplan_reason":null}}' --json
• On deep-interview -> ralplan: set current_phase:"ralplan", persist the clarified spec/requirements under handoff_artifacts.deep_interview.
• On ralplan -> ultragoal: only after ralplan_consensus_gate.complete:true, with ralplan_architect_review.agent_role:"architect" and ralplan_architect_review.verdict:"approve" recorded before ralplan_critic_review.agent_role:"critic" and ralplan_critic_review.verdict:"approve"; set current_phase:"ultragoal" and persist the plan/test-spec paths under handoff_artifacts.ralplan.
• On missing ralplan consensus evidence: keep current_phase:"ralplan", persist ralplan_consensus_gate.complete:false with blocked_reason, and report an explicit blocker or max-iteration outcome instead of handing off to execution.
• On ultragoal -> code-review: set current_phase:"code-review", persist implementation/test/ledger evidence under handoff_artifacts.ultragoal.
• On code-review -> ultraqa: set current_phase:"ultraqa", persist the clean review under handoff_artifacts.code_review.
• On clean review + passed/skipped QA: set active:false, current_phase:"complete", persist review_verdict:{recommendation:"APPROVE", architectural_status:"CLEAR", clean:true}, qa_verdict:{clean:true, skipped:<boolean>, reason:<string|null>}, and completed_at.
• On non-clean review or failed QA: increment iteration and review_cycle, set current_phase:"ralplan", persist review_verdict or qa_verdict, persist the phase handoff, and set return_to_ralplan_reason to a concise findings-driven reason.
• Legacy Ralph state: if a user explicitly selected the legacy Ralph execution lane, phase names and handoff keys may include ralph; preserve and resume them rather than rewriting history to Ultragoal.
• On cancellation: run $cancel; preserve progress for resume rather than deleting handoff artifacts. </State_Management>

<Continuation_And_Resume> When the user says continue, resume, or keep going while Autopilot is active, read autopilot-state.json and continue from current_phase:

• deep-interview: clarify requirements and record the handoff artifact.
• ralplan: run/update consensus planning from current handoffs and any return_to_ralplan_reason.
• ultragoal: execute the approved plan durably and record verification/ledger evidence.
• team: continue explicit team work only when it is nested under the active Ultragoal story and report evidence back to the leader.
• code-review: review the current diff and decide clean vs return-to-ralplan.
• ultraqa: run or explicitly skip adversarial QA based on the documented condition, then finish if clean or transition to ralplan with findings if not clean.
• ralph: resume only for explicit legacy Ralph-path Autopilot state.
• complete: report completion evidence; do not restart.

Do not restart discovery or discard handoff artifacts on continuation. </Continuation_And_Resume>

<Pipeline_Orchestrator> Autopilot may be represented by the configurable pipeline orchestrator (src/pipeline/) when useful. The default Autopilot pipeline contract is:

deep-interview -> ralplan -> ultragoal -> code-review -> ultraqa

Pipeline state should use current_phase values that match the same phase names (deep-interview, ralplan, ultragoal, code-review, ultraqa, complete, failed) and should carry iteration, review_cycle, handoff_artifacts, review_verdict, qa_verdict, and return_to_ralplan_reason alongside stage results. $team is not a default pipeline stage; it is an explicit conditional execution engine inside an Ultragoal story. </Pipeline_Orchestrator>

<Escalation_And_Stop_Conditions>

• Stop and report a blocker when required credentials/authority are missing.
• Stop and report when the same review or QA failure recurs across 3 review cycles with no meaningful new plan.
• Stop when the user says "stop", "cancel", or "abort" and run $cancel.
• Otherwise, continue the loop until $code-review is clean and $ultraqa has passed or been explicitly skipped with evidence. </Escalation_And_Stop_Conditions>

<Final_Checklist>

• Phase deep-interview produced/updated clarified requirements or a concise spec
• Phase ralplan produced/updated approved planning artifacts and durable sequential Architect→Critic consensus evidence
• Phase ultragoal implemented and verified the plan with fresh evidence and durable ledger/checkpoint references
• $team was used only if the active Ultragoal story needed coordinated parallel work, or explicitly recorded as not needed
• Phase code-review returned a clean verdict (APPROVE + CLEAR)
• Phase ultraqa passed, or was explicitly skipped because the change was docs-only/trivially non-runtime with evidence
• review_verdict.clean is true, qa_verdict.clean is true, and return_to_ralplan_reason is null
• Tests/build/lint/typecheck evidence from Ultragoal is available in handoff artifacts
• Autopilot state is marked complete or cancellation state is preserved coherently
• User receives a concise summary with clarification, plan, implementation, verification, review, and QA evidence </Final_Checklist>

User: `$autopilot implement GitHub issue #42` Flow: create/load context snapshot -> `$deep-interview` requirements check -> `$ralplan` issue plan -> `$ultragoal` durable implementation + tests (launch `$team` only if a story needs parallel lanes) -> `$code-review` -> `$ultraqa`; if review or QA requests changes, return to `$ralplan` with findings. User: `continue` Context: Autopilot state says `current_phase:"code-review"`. Flow: run `$code-review` on current diff, persist verdict, transition to `ultraqa` if clean or to `ralplan` with findings if not clean. User: `$autopilot --legacy-ralph finish the migration` Flow: preserve the explicit legacy Ralph execution choice and run the old Ralph execution lane as an alternate, without changing the documented default Autopilot recommendation. Autopilot invents independent "Expansion", "QA", and "Validation" phases and treats them as the primary lifecycle. Why bad: this bypasses the strict `$deep-interview -> $ralplan -> $ultragoal -> $code-review -> $ultraqa` contract.