Run any Skill in Manus with one click

tri-debug

Stars5

Forks1

UpdatedApril 11, 2026 at 19:41

Three independent root-cause analyses of a hard bug or failure — smart + general + fast model tiers diagnose in parallel, then theories are compared and reconciled. Use when the user asks for tri-debug, triple debug, three-way debugging, multi-model diagnosis, parallel debug, consensus root-cause analysis, or is stuck on a hard bug and wants divergent hypotheses. Worth the extra cost when — the bug is hard (heisenbug, intermittent, cross-system), logs are ambiguous, the obvious fixes have already failed, or the user explicitly wants three independent theories before committing to one. Do NOT use for code review (use tri-review), security audits (use tri-security), or comparing greenfield implementation approaches (use tri-dispatch). Do NOT use for simple "what does this error mean" or routine null-check / typo bugs — a single pass is faster.

Installation

Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.

Run Skill in Manus

Source

5uck1ess

5uck1ess/devkit

View GitHub Repository View Creator Repositories

Download

Run Skill in Manus

Related occupationsSOC

Based on SOC occupation classification

Software DevelopersComputer and Mathematical Occupations·SOC 15-1252

SKILL.md

readonly

name

tri-debug

description

Tri-Debug

Deterministic three-model diagnosis. smart-diagnosis → general-diagnosis → fast-diagnosis (in parallel) → compare theories → consensus.

Invoke

Use the devkit_start tool with workflow: "tri-debug" and input: "{input}".

Then follow each step the engine returns. Call devkit_advance after completing each step. The engine controls step order, gates, and loops. Do NOT skip steps.

More from this repository

same repository

adr

5uck1ess/devkit

Generate Architecture Decision Records — use when asked to document a decision, create an ADR, record why we chose X, or capture architectural rationale.

2026-05-195

doc-gen

5uck1ess/devkit

Generate documentation for code — use when asked to document a module, generate API docs, create a README for code, or write reference documentation. Triggers the deterministic doc-gen workflow (analyze → generate via documenter agent → write).

2026-05-195

health

5uck1ess/devkit

Check devkit health — which external CLIs (codex, gemini, gh, rtk, sg, gcli) are installed, which agents are available, which skills are ready to use. Use when asked about devkit health, devkit status, "is devkit working?", "what's installed?", "what devkit capabilities do I have?", diagnosing devkit setup issues, or running /devkit:health. Read-only diagnostic, safe to auto-invoke.

2026-05-195

mega-pr

5uck1ess/devkit

Fan-out PR review that runs BOTH `/devkit:tri-review` AND `/pr-review-toolkit:review-pr` in parallel for maximum coverage, then presents unified results — this skill does not compete with its sub-skills, it delegates to both simultaneously. Use when the user asks for "mega PR review", "mega-pr", "mega review", "full PR review with everything", "both review tools", "maximum coverage review", or explicitly wants every available reviewer looking at a change at once (Claude + Codex + Gemini model diversity PLUS specialized aspect reviewers like silent-failure-hunter, type-design-analyzer, test-analyzer, code-reviewer). Worth the extra cost when: the PR is high-stakes and the user wants every angle covered, or before merging a critical or hard-to-revert change. Do NOT use when the user only wants one review system (use tri-review or pr-review-toolkit:review-pr directly). Do NOT use for routine code review where a single reviewer suffices. This is deliberate overkill for when you want absolutely everything.

2026-05-195

onboard

5uck1ess/devkit

Generate a codebase onboarding guide — use when asked to explain this codebase, help understand the architecture, give a tour of the repo, or onboard a new contributor. Triggers the deterministic onboard workflow (analyze structure → architect via researcher agent → write guide).

2026-05-195

pr-ready

5uck1ess/devkit

Full end-to-end PR pipeline — validate → necessity-check → lint (loop) → test (loop) → security scan → doc-check → changelog → create-pr → monitor reviews (loop). Takes a branch from "code done" to "merged" with every gate enforced. Use when the user asks to "submit a PR", "open a pull request", "ship this", "make this PR-ready", "finalize this branch", or wants the full pipeline run end-to-end with CI monitoring and reviewer-comment handling automated. Worth the ceremony when: lint and test gates must pass before the PR opens, docs need syncing alongside code (README, ROADMAP, SKILL.md, workflows), security scan is required, or the user wants reviewer comments automatically classified and responded to. Do NOT use for a quick commit+push+PR without gates — use `/commit-commands:commit-push-pr` for that lighter path. Do NOT use when already mid-PR and just handling existing review comments in isolation. Do NOT use on the main branch or with uncommitted changes — the validate step will block you. This is devkit

2026-05-195

name

tri-debug

description

Tri-Debug

Deterministic three-model diagnosis. smart-diagnosis → general-diagnosis → fast-diagnosis (in parallel) → compare theories → consensus.

Invoke

Use the devkit_start tool with workflow: "tri-debug" and input: "{input}".

Then follow each step the engine returns. Call devkit_advance after completing each step. The engine controls step order, gates, and loops. Do NOT skip steps.