| name | nav-graph |
| description | Query project knowledge graph. Search across tasks, SOPs, memories, and concepts. Use when user asks "what do we know about X?", "show everything related to X", or "remember this pattern/pitfall/decision". |
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, Edit, Bash |
| version | 1.0.0 |
Navigator Knowledge Graph Skill
Query and manage the unified project knowledge graph. Surfaces relevant knowledge from tasks, SOPs, system docs, and experiential memories.
Why This Exists
Navigator v6.0.0 introduces the Project Knowledge Graph:
- Unified search: Query across all knowledge types with one interface
- Experiential memory: Patterns, pitfalls, decisions, learnings persist
- Context-aware retrieval: Load only relevant knowledge (~1-2k tokens)
- Relationship traversal: Find related concepts and documents
When to Invoke
Query triggers:
- "What do we know about X?"
- "Show everything related to X"
- "Any pitfalls for X?"
- "What decisions about X?"
- "Find all knowledge about X"
Memory capture triggers:
- "Remember this pattern: ..."
- "Remember this pitfall: ..."
- "Remember we decided: ..."
- "Remember this learning: ..."
Graph management triggers:
- "Initialize knowledge graph"
- "Rebuild knowledge graph"
- "Show graph stats"
Graph Location
.agent/knowledge/graph.json (~1-2k tokens, loaded on query)
Execution Steps
Step 1: Determine Action
QUERY (searching knowledge):
User: "What do we know about authentication?"
→ Query graph by concept
CAPTURE (storing memory):
User: "Remember: auth changes often break session tests"
→ Create new memory node
INIT (building graph):
User: "Initialize knowledge graph"
→ Build graph from existing docs
STATS (viewing graph):
User: "Show graph stats"
→ Display graph statistics
Step 2: Load or Initialize Graph
Check if graph exists:
if [ -f ".agent/knowledge/graph.json" ]; then
echo "Graph exists"
else
echo "No graph found, will initialize"
fi
Initialize if not exists:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_builder.py" \
--agent-dir .agent \
--output .agent/knowledge/graph.json
Step 3A: Query Knowledge (If QUERY Action)
Extract concept from user input:
User: "What do we know about testing?"
→ Concept: testing
User: "Any pitfalls for auth?"
→ Concept: auth (normalized to authentication)
Run query:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_manager.py" \
--action query \
--concept "testing" \
--graph-path .agent/knowledge/graph.json
Display results:
Knowledge Graph: "testing"
TASKS (3)
- TASK-30: Task Verification Enhancement (completed)
- TASK-17: Visual Regression Integration (completed)
- TASK-11: Project Skills Generation (completed)
MEMORIES (2)
- PITFALL: "Auth changes break session tests" (90%)
- PATTERN: "Always run unit tests before integration" (85%)
SOPs (1)
- visual-regression-setup
FILES (5)
- skills/backend-test/*
- skills/frontend-test/*
Load details: "Read TASK-30" or "Show testing memories"
Step 3B: Capture Memory (If CAPTURE Action)
Parse memory from user input:
User: "Remember this pitfall: auth changes often break session tests"
→ Type: pitfall
→ Summary: "auth changes often break session tests"
→ Concepts: [auth, testing]
User: "Remember we decided to use JWT over sessions for scaling"
→ Type: decision
→ Summary: "use JWT over sessions for scaling"
→ Concepts: [auth, architecture]
Determine memory type:
| User Says | Memory Type |
|---|
| "pattern", "we use", "approach" | pattern |
| "pitfall", "watch out", "careful" | pitfall |
| "decided", "chose", "because" | decision |
| "learned", "discovered", "realized" | learning |
Create memory:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_manager.py" \
--action add-memory \
--memory-type pitfall \
--summary "auth changes often break session tests" \
--concepts "auth,testing" \
--confidence 0.9 \
--graph-path .agent/knowledge/graph.json
Write guarantees (v6.17.0+): the backing .md is written BEFORE the
graph node and failures fail loudly (no more path-points-at-nothing nodes);
a failed graph save rolls the file back. Concepts are validated against the
graph's concept vocabulary — an unknown concept rejects the write and lists
the valid vocabulary. Pass --allow-new-concept to register genuinely new
concepts instead. Graphs without a curated vocabulary skip validation.
Optionally create detailed memory file:
# Pitfall: Auth Changes Break Session Tests
## Summary
Auth changes often break session tests due to...
## Context
Discovered during TASK-XX when...
## Recommended Approach
When modifying auth, always run...
## Related
- TASK-12: V3 Skills-Only
- SOP: autonomous-completion
Confirm capture:
Memory captured: mem-001
Type: Pitfall
Summary: "auth changes often break session tests"
Concepts: auth, testing
Confidence: 90%
This will be surfaced when working on auth or testing topics.
Step 3C: Initialize Graph (If INIT Action)
Build from existing docs:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_builder.py" \
--agent-dir .agent \
--output .agent/knowledge/graph.json
Display results:
Knowledge Graph Initialized
Scanned:
- Tasks: 35
- SOPs: 12
- System docs: 3
- Markers: 8
Extracted:
- Concepts: 15
- Relationships: 47
Graph saved to .agent/knowledge/graph.json
Query with: "What do we know about [topic]?"
Rebuild safety (v6.17.0+): re-running the builder over an existing graph
PRESERVES the memories and files buckets and their edges — memories carry
graph-only fields no scan can reconstruct, and rebuilds used to wipe them
silently. Pass --no-preserve-memories for an intentional from-scratch
rebuild.
Step 3D: Show Stats (If STATS Action)
Display graph statistics:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_manager.py" \
--action stats \
--graph-path .agent/knowledge/graph.json
Output:
Knowledge Graph Statistics
==========================
Total Nodes: 65
Total Edges: 47
Memories: 5
Last Updated: 2025-01-23T10:30:00Z
By Type:
Tasks: 35
SOPs: 12
System: 3
Markers: 8
Concepts: 15
Memories: 5
Step 4: Find Related (Optional)
If user asks for related items:
User: "What's related to TASK-29?"
Run traversal:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_manager.py" \
--action related \
--node-id "TASK-29" \
--max-depth 2 \
--graph-path .agent/knowledge/graph.json
Memory Types
Pattern
"We use X for Y in this project"
- Reusable approaches
- Project conventions
- Best practices
Pitfall
"Watch out for X when touching Y"
- Common mistakes
- Gotchas
- Failure modes
Decision
"We chose X over Y because Z"
- Architecture decisions
- Technology choices
- Trade-off rationale
Learning
"X usually means Y in this codebase"
- Project-specific knowledge
- Error interpretations
- Domain insights
Confidence System
Base confidence:
- Correction-based: 0.8
- Explicit capture: 0.9
Decay:
- 1% per week since last validation
Boost:
Threshold:
- Below 0.3: Candidate for pruning
- Above 0.7: Reliable memory
Integration with Other Skills
nav-start (Session Start)
Loads graph stats on session start:
Knowledge graph: 65 nodes, 5 memories
Relevant: 2 memories for current context
nav-task (Task Creation)
Auto-extracts concepts from new tasks:
Creating TASK-35: Project Memory
Extracted concepts: knowledge, memory, graph
Added to graph.
nav-profile (Corrections)
Corrections auto-create memories via correction_to_memory.py:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/correction_to_memory.py" \
--action convert-one \
--correction-json '{"pattern": "...", "context": "...", "confidence": "high"}'
[Correction detected]
→ Type: pitfall (based on pattern analysis)
→ Concepts: [auth, testing] (auto-extracted)
→ Created memory: mem-002
→ Added to graph
Sync all corrections:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/correction_to_memory.py" \
--action sync \
--profile-path .agent/.user-profile.json \
--graph-path .agent/knowledge/graph.json
nav-marker (Context Markers)
Markers reference graph state:
## Graph State
- Memories surfaced: mem-001, mem-003
- Concepts active: auth, testing
navigator-research (Codebase Exploration Agent)
The navigator-research agent emits a structured research_findings JSON block alongside its markdown summary. After the agent returns, ingest those findings as graph memories via research_to_graph.py:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/research_to_graph.py" findings.json
cat findings.json | python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/research_to_graph.py" -
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/research_to_graph.py" findings.json --dry-run
Trigger phrases:
- "Ingest research findings"
- "Save these findings to the graph"
- (Automatic, when a navigator-research invocation completes — orchestrator may auto-ingest)
Defaults:
- Confidence:
0.7 (lower than corrections/explicit captures — research is inference)
- Memory types accepted:
pattern, pitfall, decision, learning
- Invalid entries are skipped with a printed error (exit code 1 if any errors)
- Evidence path (e.g.
src/auth.ts:42) is embedded into the memory summary
Schema: see the Output Format section of agents/navigator-research.md for the full JSON shape the agent emits.
Configuration
In .agent/.nav-config.json:
{
"knowledge_graph": {
"enabled": true,
"auto_capture_corrections": true,
"auto_capture_decisions": true,
"auto_surface_relevant": true,
"max_session_memories": 5,
"confidence_decay_rate": 0.01,
"staleness_threshold_days": 90,
"git_tracked": true
}
}
Note: confidence_decay_rate and staleness_threshold_days are consumed
only by the manual graph_maintenance commands (--action decay /
--action stale). They are not applied automatically on session start —
decaying a git-tracked file every session would create constant churn. Run
decay/staleness manually when curating the graph.
Graph Maintenance
Health Check
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_maintenance.py" --action health
Output:
Knowledge Graph Health Check
========================================
Total Nodes: 133
Total Edges: 706
Memories: 37 (37 high confidence)
Tasks: 38
Concepts: 16
Orphan Nodes: 0
Duplicate Edges: 0
Dangling Edges: 0
Confidence Out-of-Range: 0
Health Score: 100/100
No integrity issues detected!
Advisory (not scored):
- 8 potential memory conflicts (heuristic, advisory)
- 3 stale memories (not validated in 90+ days)
Duplicate Edges, Dangling Edges, and Confidence Out-of-Range are the
integrity gate — all three should read 0 on a healthy graph. If they don't,
run --action repair (below).
v6.17.0 adds disk-vs-graph checks: Broken File Links (node references a
file that doesn't exist) and Unindexed Memory Files (files on disk with no
node — the drift class a 2026-07 audit found at 52/84 in a consumer repo)
are score-affecting; concept-vocabulary drift and archived resolved/ files
without nodes are advisory. Pass --root <project-root> when running from
another directory.
Reconcile Disk vs Graph (v6.17.0+)
Report drift between memory files on disk and graph nodes; --execute
registers unindexed files (type from parent dir, resolved/ parent →
resolved: true, frontmatter/heading parsing with conservative fallbacks —
0.5 confidence when unknown). Broken-link nodes are never auto-deleted and
concept refs are never rewritten — those two are report-and-hint only:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_maintenance.py" --action reconcile
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_maintenance.py" --action reconcile --execute
Resolve / Supersede a Memory (v6.17.0+)
When a memory stops being true (bug fixed, decision reversed, guidance
codified elsewhere), do NOT delete it — resolve it. The node gets
resolved: true (+ superseded_by and a supersedes edge when a newer
memory replaces it) and the backing file moves to the sibling resolved/
directory. Resolved memories are excluded from session-start surfacing and
task-doc recall, skipped by stale/decay sweeps, and flagged [resolved] in
query output:
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_manager.py" \
--action resolve-memory --node-id mem-012 [--superseded-by mem-045]
Memory Recall (v6.17.0+)
Deterministic relevance ranking used by the SessionStart hook and nav-task
Step 2.5 — also useful standalone:
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/memory_recall.py" \
--concepts "auth,testing" --format markdown --limit 5
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/memory_recall.py" \
--auto --agent-dir .agent --limit 5
Scoring: concept overlap (alias-resolved), then confidence; resolved
memories excluded; silent (exit 0, no output) when nothing matches.
Compatible with consumer graphs that use file: keys and lack a
concept_index.
Repair Integrity Defects
Idempotently dedupe (from, to, type) edge rows, drop edges that reference a
missing node id, and normalize out-of-range memory confidences (a value like
90.0 is treated as 90% → 0.9). Safe to re-run:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_maintenance.py" --action repair
Conflict Detection
Find memories that may contradict each other. Advisory only — a
high-false-positive keyword heuristic that does not affect the health score:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_maintenance.py" --action conflicts
Stale Memory Detection
Find memories not validated in 90+ days:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_maintenance.py" --action stale --stale-days 90
Low Confidence Pruning
Find and optionally remove low-confidence memories:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_maintenance.py" --action prune --threshold 0.3 --dry-run
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_maintenance.py" --action prune --threshold 0.3 --execute
Apply Decay (experimental, manual-only)
Reduce confidence based on time since each memory's last decay. Idempotent —
running it twice on the same day is a no-op (each memory tracks last_decayed).
The rate defaults to knowledge_graph.confidence_decay_rate when --decay-rate
is omitted. This is not wired to any hook; run it manually when curating:
PLUGIN_DIR="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/navigator-marketplace/navigator}"
[ -d "$PLUGIN_DIR" ] || PLUGIN_DIR="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/navigator-marketplace"
python3 "$PLUGIN_DIR/skills/nav-graph/functions/graph_maintenance.py" --action decay
Token Budget
| Component | Tokens | When |
|---|
| graph.json (50 nodes) | ~1000 | On query |
| graph.json (200 nodes) | ~2000 | On query |
| Memory summaries (5) | ~500 | On session start |
| Full memory detail | ~500 each | On request |
Session overhead: ~1.3k tokens
Success Criteria
Graph skill succeeds when:
Best Practices
Good queries:
- "What do we know about auth?" (specific concept)
- "Any pitfalls for testing?" (scoped type)
- "Show everything related to TASK-29" (node traversal)
Good memory capture:
- "Remember: we use X for Y" (clear pattern)
- "Remember this pitfall: X breaks Y" (specific issue)
- "Remember we decided X because Y" (rationale included)
Avoid:
- Overly broad queries ("What do we know?")
- Storing code snippets in memories (use paths instead)
- Capturing obvious knowledge (focus on project-specific insights)
This skill transforms Navigator from stateless assistant to knowledge-aware team member