| name | codex-cli |
| description | Run OpenAI Codex CLI for one-shot cross-AI code review or approach validation. Invoke ONLY when the user explicitly asks ('second opinion', 'codex review', 'ask codex', 'run codex', 'cross-AI check'), or when another skill passes an explicit instruction to delegate to codex. Do not invoke proactively on general review requests โ the primary review skills handle those. Not for interactive conversations (codex is one-shot only). |
| allowed-tools | ["Bash","Read"] |
Codex CLI Integration Skill
Announcement: Begin with: "I'm using the codex-cli skill for cross-AI validation with Codex."
Invoke OpenAI Codex CLI for one-shot code review, approach validation, and cross-AI verification.
Self-Update: Official Documentation
When the skill feels outdated (wrong flags, unknown model, new features), consult these
official sources to update commands and reference files:
Use WebFetch or mcp__exa__web_search_exa to check for updates when:
- A codex command fails with an unknown flag error
- The user mentions a codex feature not covered here
- The user explicitly asks to verify the skill against upstream docs
Last verified: v0.116.0 (March 2026), default model gpt-5.4
Prerequisite: Verify Installation
Before the first codex call in a session, verify the binary works:
codex --version
Update only if (a) a command fails with an unknown-flag error, (b) the version is older than v0.116.1, or (c) the user explicitly asks. The reason: v0.115-0.116 had an approval-loop regression; older versions work fine for most reviews.
npm i -g @openai/codex@latest
If codex is not installed at all:
npm i -g @openai/codex
Command variants: codex review vs codex exec review
These are NOT equivalent โ they have different flag sets:
| Command | Has --full-auto? | Has -m? | Has -o (working)? | Prompt + scope flags? |
|---|
codex review (top-level) | NO | NO | NO | N/A |
codex exec review | YES | YES | -o writes empty! | Mutually exclusive |
codex exec | YES | YES | YES (works) | N/A |
Use codex exec review for scoped reviews (scope flags auto-select the diff).
Use codex exec when you need both a custom prompt AND full output capture via -o.
The top-level codex review only supports: --uncommitted, --base, --commit, --title, -c, --enable, --disable.
Core Patterns
1. Custom Prompt (most common)
codex exec "[prompt with explicit file paths]" \
-m gpt-5.4 --full-auto \
-o /tmp/codex-result.md > /dev/null 2>&1 && echo "Codex completed"
Then read with Read tool: /tmp/codex-result.md
2. Code Review
v0.116.0 constraints (tested and verified):
- Scope flags (
--uncommitted, --base, --commit) are mutually exclusive with [PROMPT]
-o flag writes empty for review commands โ review output goes to stderr- Must capture stderr to file:
2> /tmp/codex-review.md
Option A: Scoped review (no custom prompt โ codex decides what to focus on)
codex exec review --base main \
-m gpt-5.4 --full-auto \
2> /tmp/codex-review.md && echo "Review completed"
codex exec review --uncommitted \
-m gpt-5.4 --full-auto \
2> /tmp/codex-review.md && echo "Review completed"
codex exec review --commit [SHA] \
-m gpt-5.4 --full-auto \
2> /tmp/codex-review.md && echo "Review completed"
Option B: Custom prompt review (codex decides scope โ PREFERRED)
Pass a detailed prompt WITHOUT scope flags. Codex will figure out the diff context.
codex exec review \
-m gpt-5.4 --full-auto \
"Review the uncommitted changes in this repo. Focus on:
1. Correctness and edge cases
2. Error handling
3. Security concerns
Key files: [list relevant files or modules]
Requirements: [link to task doc or brief description]" \
2> /tmp/codex-review.md && echo "Review completed"
Option C: Use codex exec instead of codex exec review (full control)
When you need both scope control AND a custom prompt, use plain codex exec:
codex exec "Review the git diff between main and HEAD. Focus on:
1. [Focus area 1]
2. [Focus area 2]
Context: [what this branch implements]
Check against: [task-file-path]" \
-m gpt-5.4 --full-auto \
-o /tmp/codex-review.md > /dev/null 2>&1 && echo "Review completed"
Then read with Read tool: /tmp/codex-review.md
Note on stderr capture: Review output in stderr includes verbose logs (diffs, commands).
The actual review findings are at the end of the file. When reading, scan for lines
starting with - [P (priority findings) or Review comment: markers.
3. Background Execution (for long tasks with parallel work)
Use run_in_background: true only when you have a concrete non-codex task queued for the same turn (reading files, editing, running another CLI). If the next step is "wait for codex to finish and summarize", run synchronously โ the notification overhead isn't worth it.
codex exec "[complex prompt]" -m gpt-5.4 --full-auto \
-o /tmp/codex-result.md > /dev/null 2>&1 && echo "Codex completed"
Workflow:
- Run with
run_in_background: true on the Bash tool
- Continue working on other tasks while codex runs
- You'll be notified automatically when it completes
- Read
/tmp/codex-result.md with the Read tool
- Summarize findings to the user
Output capture
Why it matters
Without redirection, Bash returns ~4700+ tokens of verbose output. With -o + redirect, you get ~30 tokens โ a ~150ร reduction. Use this pattern whenever you invoke codex.
Pattern: -o /tmp/codex-result.md > /dev/null 2>&1 && echo "Codex completed"
Read the result with the Read tool (not cat) so the file is registered with the harness and counted once.
Codex Has No Context From This Conversation
Codex starts with zero context. Every invocation is a cold start. Always include in your prompt:
- Task/requirement file paths โ so codex knows what to check against
- Implementation file paths โ so codex knows what to review
- Directory paths โ for broader context
- What to focus on โ specific concerns, not generic "review this"
- Brief context โ what the feature/change does (1-2 sentences)
This applies to ALL commands including codex exec review โ the --uncommitted/--base flags
only tell codex WHICH diff to look at, not HOW to review it. The prompt provides the HOW.
Example:
codex exec "Review the implementation in:
- {{SRC_DIR}}/application/sessions/use-cases/create-session.use-case.ts
- {{SRC_DIR}}/infrastructure/web/dto/sessions/create-session.dto.ts
Check against requirements in: tasks/task-2026-01-09-feature/tech-decomposition.md
Focus on: correctness, edge cases, error handling" \
-m gpt-5.4 --full-auto -o /tmp/codex-result.md > /dev/null 2>&1
Parallel with sibling CLI skills
When the caller wants perspectives from multiple external CLIs (e.g. codex + cursor + antigravity) on the same diff or question, issue the three Bash calls in the same turn rather than sequentially. The calls have no dependency on each other and the external CLIs take 1-10 minutes each โ serializing them multiplies wall-clock time.
One-Shot Only
Codex runs non-interactively. No follow-up questions, no conversation. Craft your prompt to be complete and self-contained.
Web Search
Codex has built-in web search (cached by default). Add --search for live results:
codex exec "Research best practices for [topic]" \
-m gpt-5.4 --full-auto --search -o /tmp/codex-result.md > /dev/null 2>&1
When NOT to Use
- Simple, quick tasks (overhead not worth the 1-10 min wait)
- Tasks requiring interactive conversation/refinement
- Trivial changes (typos, formatting)
Reference Files
Read these as needed โ they are NOT loaded into context automatically:
| File | When to Read |
|---|
reference.md | Need exact flag syntax, sandbox modes, config options, or error handling |
templates.md | Need a structured prompt template for a specific review type |
