workpad

name	workpad
description	Manage the single Symphony Workpad comment on a Linear issue — find or bootstrap, update in place, or reset (Rework). Use whenever the workflow needs to read or write the workpad. Includes the GraphQL `commentUpdate` workaround for the known Linear MCP `save_comment` duplication bug.

Workpad

The workpad is the single source of truth for an issue's plan, acceptance criteria, validation, and notes. One ## Symphony Workpad comment per issue, ever — never open a second one, never delete it.

Find or bootstrap

1. List comments on the issue with the configured Linear MCP comment-listing tool, normally mcp__linear__list_comments in Codex.
2. Find the comment whose body starts with ## Symphony Workpad. If found: persist its id for in-place updates and reuse it.
3. If not found, create one with the configured Linear MCP comment-save tool, normally mcp__linear__save_comment in Codex, using the template at the bottom of this skill. Persist the returned id.

Update in place (the trap)

The Linear MCP save_comment tool with a commentId creates a new comment instead of editing the original — this is what produces duplicate workpads. Always update via raw GraphQL:

curl -fsS \
  -H "Authorization: $LINEAR_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  https://api.linear.app/graphql \
  -d @- <<'JSON'
{"query":"mutation($id:String!,$body:String!){commentUpdate(id:$id,input:{body:$body}){success}}",
 "variables":{"id":"<comment-id>","body":"<new body>"}}
JSON

If duplicates were already created by a buggy save, edit the canonical (oldest) workpad in place via the GraphQL workaround and replace the duplicate's body with Superseded — see canonical Symphony Workpad above.. Do not delete the duplicate — the workpad comment, even a duplicate one, is never test data.

Reset (Rework)

When the issue moves to Rework, overwrite the existing workpad's body in place with a fresh scaffold via the same commentUpdate mutation. Do not delete the comment. Keep the same comment ID for the lifetime of the issue.

Acceptance criteria & validation

• Capture every checkbox the workflow requires (env stamp, plan, acceptance, validation, notes).
• If the issue body has Validation, Test Plan, or Testing sections, copy them verbatim into Acceptance / Validation as required checkboxes — no optional downgrade.
• For user-facing changes, add a UI walkthrough criterion. Screenshots themselves go in the PR description via the screenshot skill, not in the workpad.

Linking artifacts

• PR URL → attach to the issue (Linear attachment), not the workpad body. The auto-link from git push usually creates the attachment automatically; otherwise use GraphQL:

  mutation AttachGitHubPR($issueId: String!, $url: String!, $title: String) {
    attachmentLinkGitHubPR(issueId: $issueId, url: $url, title: $title, linkKind: links) {
      success
      attachment { id title url }
    }
  }
  

• Screenshots → use the screenshot skill to embed in the PR description; do not paste them into the workpad.

Don't

• Don't post separate "done"/summary comments outside the workpad.
• Don't edit the issue body/description for planning or progress.
• Don't put the PR URL in the workpad body.
• Don't delete the workpad — even if it duplicated.

Template

## Symphony Workpad

```text
<hostname>:<abs-path>@<short-sha>
```

### Plan

- [ ] 1\. Parent task
  - [ ] 1.1 Child task
- [ ] 2\. Parent task

### Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] Criterion 1

### Validation

- [ ] targeted tests: `<command>`

### Notes

- <short progress note with timestamp>

### Confusions

- <only include when something was confusing during execution>