Menu
Review task file spec from all angles: flag omissions, fix uncontroversial problems, punt real decisions to user. Requires task file path.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Rant, swear, and insult like Linus Torvalds on the LKML — brutally blunt technical criticism. Use when user asks for Linus review/voice or for swearing.
Terse writing/comm style. Use for agent messages, skills, instructions, memories, docs, comments, commit messages and similar.
Record user feedback for the active task without interrupting work. Use only when explicitly asked to add, remember, or handle later.
Verify browser-visible behavior and capture focused UI evidence. Use after implementation for browser-impact work or when explicitly requested.
Archive completed Zoo spec files and resolved proposal files. Use when cleaning finished `.spec` work, moving completed specs into `archived/`, or moving implemented/rejected proposals into archive while honoring repo-local Zoo path overrides.
Tiered code review gate: tests, scripted checks, narrow parallel checks, broad review. Invokable standalone on any diff or inside Zoo workflow.
| name | zoo-spec-review |
| description | Review task file spec from all angles: flag omissions, fix uncontroversial problems, punt real decisions to user. Requires task file path. |
Follow .zoo/zoo.md, .zoo/planning.md, .zoo/planreview.md if exists.
Review task file against codebase and research file. Do not start impl/full workflow. Question: "Is it right?"
Check Request, Decisions, Spec, Subtasks when present:
Act:
Decisions.Decisions marked (USER).## Log.