with one click
sentinel-dismiss
Dismiss a draft Sentinel rule and prevent re-proposal
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Menu
Dismiss a draft Sentinel rule and prevent re-proposal
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
View or update Sentinel configuration
Scaffold Sentinel config and rules directory in the current repository, installing prerequisites if needed
Create or edit a Sentinel rule through guided conversation
Show Sentinel telemetry stats — rule performance, latency, violations, and hottest targets
List pending draft Sentinel rules with provenance
Scan documentation files for conventions and generate draft Sentinel rules
| name | sentinel-dismiss |
| description | Dismiss a draft Sentinel rule and prevent re-proposal |
| user-invocable | true |
Dismiss a draft rule and add it to the blocklist so Scribe won't re-propose it.
The user provides the draft rule ID as an argument: /sentinel-dismiss <id>
Look for .claude/sentinel/drafts/<id>.draft.yaml
Read the draft YAML and show a brief summary:
Confirm: "Dismiss this draft? Scribe won't propose rules with the same scope and trigger again."
Add to blocklist by running:
from sentinel_scribe import add_dismissal
# Extract scope (first pattern) and trigger from the draft
add_dismissal(scribe_dir, scope, trigger, statement)
Or equivalently, append to .sentinel/scribe/dismissed.jsonl:
{"scope": "<first scope pattern>", "trigger": "<trigger>", "statement_hash": "<hash>", "dismissed_at": "<iso timestamp>"}
Delete drafts/<id>.draft.yaml
Confirm: "Draft <id> dismissed. Scribe won't re-propose rules for this scope and trigger."
After dismissing the draft, suggest to the user:
/sentinel-drafts — review remaining pending drafts/sentinel-rule — create a rule manually if the dismissed draft was close but needed a different approach