Menu
Use to review a diff against repository contracts, specs, docs, tests, and architecture boundaries.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Use when adding, changing, or reviewing MCP servers, agent tools, provider integrations, credentials, scopes, or tool approval behavior.
Use when converting a product spec, use case, or PRD into a concrete implementation plan before code changes.
Use after incidents, regressions, repeated review findings, or completed features to convert lessons into durable factory improvements.
Use when a task requires meaningful implementation. Research the repo, inspect docs/specs, and create a concrete plan before editing code.
Use when splitting complex work into independent subagent tasks with clear ownership, evidence, and integration responsibilities.
Use when implementing behavior from an approved plan with test-first or regression-test-first development.
| name | agentic-code-review |
| description | Use to review a diff against repository contracts, specs, docs, tests, and architecture boundaries. |
Lead with findings. Prioritize:
DESIGN.mdAGENTS.md, DESIGN.md, and affected specs/docs.Valid findings should become:
Lead with findings ordered by severity. Include file references, the behavioral risk, and the smallest useful fix. Keep summaries secondary to actionable issues.