Menu
Dispatches research agents to find real projects, papers, and documented failures before proposing any feature, architecture, or technology choice. Triggers on creative/design tasks, not on implementation of already-designed specs.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Validates completed work against defined acceptance criteria. Use after completing a task that has specific success criteria defined in issues, specs, or task descriptions.
Generates edge case, failure mode, and spec-driven test cases. Covers boundary values, nil inputs, concurrency, resource exhaustion, malformed data, and requirement-linked traceability tests.
Detects and prevents shortcut rationalization — when the agent is about to skip a step, simplify a requirement, or optimize away a constraint. Triggers proactively when rationalization patterns are noticed.
Provides a persistent cross-session task queue for work that should be done but isn't blocking current tasks. Enables background and future-session work tracking.
Safely integrates commits from parallel agent branches using sequential cherry-pick. Use after parallel work completes in isolated branches or worktrees.
Audits tests for concurrency safety — race conditions, shared mock state, cleanup ordering. Use when writing tests that involve goroutines, async operations, or shared mutable state.
| name | vibe-start-informed |
| description | Dispatches research agents to find real projects, papers, and documented failures before proposing any feature, architecture, or technology choice. Triggers on creative/design tasks, not on implementation of already-designed specs. |
| user-invocable | true |
Other people's documented failures count as observed failure. Research SOTA before proposing anything.
Not for: Implementing already-designed specs, bug fixes, or tasks with clear requirements.
BEFORE proposing any approach, dispatch a research agent to find real papers, real projects, and real production systems that solve the same (or adjacent) problem.
digraph start_informed {
"Design question identified" [shape=doublecircle];
"Decompose into sub-problems" [shape=box];
"Dispatch research agent (WebSearch)" [shape=box];
"For each sub-problem find:" [shape=box];
"Synthesize imported failures" [shape=box];
"NOW propose approaches" [shape=doublecircle];
"Design question identified" -> "Decompose into sub-problems";
"Decompose into sub-problems" -> "Dispatch research agent (WebSearch)";
"Dispatch research agent (WebSearch)" -> "For each sub-problem find:";
"For each sub-problem find:" -> "Synthesize imported failures";
"Synthesize imported failures" -> "NOW propose approaches";
}
For each sub-problem, find:
| Requirement | Minimum | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Named projects | 2+ with stars/adoption | "Graphiti (23k stars)" |
| Papers with venue | 1+ with year | "RAPTOR (ICLR 2024)" |
| Mechanism described | What it actually does | Not marketing copy |
| Known failures | What went wrong | "Flat RAG failed at multi-hop" |
| Applicability assessment | How it maps to our system | Specific, not generic |
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I already know the best approach" | You know ONE approach. Research finds others. |
| "This is too niche for research" | If someone built it, someone documented failures. |
| "Research will slow us down" | Uninformed design causes rewrites. Research prevents them. |
| "The textbook answer is obvious" | JK: "These are very very weak suggestions." Do real research. |
| "Let me just propose something" | Proposals without research are guesses with confidence. |
Alien Chang-Unni Constitution v0.1, Law 5 (amended in Session 2):
Start Informed — leverage SOTA research as collective observed failure. Simplify only when observed complexity causes problems in practice. Other people's documented failures count as observed failure.
The amendment was triggered when a constitutional audit revealed every design decision violated the original "Start Stupid" law. The law was changed because importing proven approaches isn't premature complexity — it's standing on shoulders.