with one click
claude-night-market
claude-night-market contains 198 collected skills from athola, with repository-level occupation coverage and site-owned skill detail pages.
Skills in this repository
Detects AI-generated writing patterns in prose. Use when reviewing docs for slop, vague language, or identity leaks before publishing.
Audits Rust code for unsafe blocks, ownership issues, and Cargo dependency risks. Use when reviewing Rust code or before merging Rust changes.
Recommends context compression strategies for bloated or quota-heavy sessions. Use when context feels sluggish or quota burns faster than expected.
Guide minimal code via a decision ladder with full safety, edge, and negative-case coverage. Use when adding code, choosing a dependency, or auditing a diff.
Optimizes context window via MECW principles and memory tiering. Use when context exceeds 30% or before long multi-step tasks.
Generates or remediates documentation with human-quality writing. Use when creating new docs, rewriting AI-generated content, or applying style profiles.
Converts external documents (PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, HTML) into editable markdown. Use when ingesting external files for rewriting or project integration.
Extracts writing style patterns from exemplar text into a reusable profile. Use when creating a style guide or learning a specific author's voice.
Plans, drafts, and refines technical tutorials for developers. Use when writing step-by-step guides or getting-started walkthroughs backed by working code.
Guide creating Claude Code skills with TDD and persuasion principles. Use for new skill development.
Test skills via TDD in fresh subagents. Use when validating behavior or preventing bias.
Browse hookify rule catalog. Use when installing pre-built rules or browsing categories. Do not use when writing custom rules; use hookify:writing-rules.
Pre-implementation gate covering think-first, simplicity, surgical edits, and verifiable goals. Use when starting implementation to verify the approach.
Enforces validation and evidence before claiming work complete. Use before declaring implementation done, creating a PR, or submitting deliverables for review.
Scores feature worthiness and enforces branch-size limits against overengineering. Use when evaluating whether a feature belongs in the current scope or branch.
Contract for the project decision journal (tradeoffs and lessons-learned logs). Use when recording a decision, tradeoff, or lesson, or building a consumer hook.
Implements hub-and-spoke lazy loading to minimize token usage in large skills. Use when building multi-module skills that need conditional on-demand loading.
Scores agent actions by expected gain, cost, uncertainty, and redundancy. Use when deciding whether to dispatch an agent or invoke a tool.
Processes external resources into stored knowledge with quality scoring and routing. Use when ingesting articles, papers, or docs into a memory palace.
Assesses architecture decisions, ADR compliance, and coupling. Use when evaluating design changes or validating structural decisions before merging.
Applies NIST/CWE security hardening to Python and Rust code. Use when auditing code for vulnerabilities or proposing concrete security remediations.
Applies TRIZ cross-domain analogical reasoning to find solutions from adjacent fields. Use when stuck on a problem and needing inventive perspectives.
Generate diverse solution candidates with category-spanning ideation methods and rotation. Use when stuck on a design or fighting repetitive LLM output.
Provides review-workflow scaffolding for context, evidence, and output. Use at the start of any detailed review to ensure consistent, comparable findings.
Formats review deliverables with consistent structure for comparable findings. Use when finalizing any review or analysis that must be shared or compared.
Evaluates API surface design, consistency, and exemplar alignment. Use when reviewing public API changes or before releasing a new API surface.
Analyzes code change impact with risk scoring and affected-node mapping. Use before merging to understand what a change touches and what lacks test coverage.
Hunts bugs with evidence trails. Use when investigating unexpected behavior or before merging code with potential hidden defects.
Improves code quality across duplication, efficiency, and architectural fit. Use when code passes tests but quality is poor or before a major release.
Audits Makefiles for build correctness, portability, and recipe duplication. Use when reviewing a Makefile or before committing Makefile changes.
Verifies math-heavy code for algorithmic correctness and numerical stability. Use when reviewing scientific algorithms, ML models, or numerical code.
Detects time and space complexity hotspots via AST scan. Use when code feels slow, before performance-sensitive merges, or to find O(n²) regressions.
Applies NASA Power of 10 rules for safety-critical verifiable code. Use when auditing financial, medical, or high-reliability system code.
Audits shell scripts for correctness, portability, and common pitfalls. Use when reviewing shell scripts or before committing shell changes.
Evaluates test suites for coverage gaps, TDD/BDD compliance, and anti-patterns. Use when auditing test quality or before a major release.
Runs a three-tier codebase audit (git history, targeted scans, full review) with gating. Use when auditing a codebase before release or after incidents.
Reviews pull requests with scope validation, requirements compliance, and line comments. Use when reviewing GitHub or GitLab PRs.
Runs parallel prose and craft review agents against a voice profile. Use when checking generated content for AI patterns and voice drift before publishing.
Makes agent reasoning visible, surfaces tradeoffs, and fades help so humans build judgment. Use when reviewing or learning from agent-written code.
Verifies a package exists before install, defending against hallucination and slopsquatting. Use when adding, recommending, or installing a package.