claude-legends-review

Use when the user wants a comprehensive code review from multiple perspectives, or invokes a team-based review combining business, design, and engineering viewpoints with debate and consensus. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks for a "legends review", "team review", "full review", "review from all angles", or wants business + design + engineering perspectives debated together. Also trigger when the user wants Elon, Jobs, AND Linus to review the same code, or asks for a multi-perspective review with debate and consensus. This is the flagship skill — use it when no single persona is enough.

Use when the user requests a code review with technical and business recommendations. On-demand review combining Elon Musk's first-principles thinking with structured diff analysis, observability, and broader architecture assessment. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks for an "elon review", "elon style", "musk review", "first principles review", "business value review", or wants to know if a feature should exist, if the code could be 10x simpler, what to delete, or what the opportunity cost is. Also trigger when reviewing architecture decisions, velocity concerns, or anything where both technical rigor AND business context matter.

Use when the user requests a code review focused on design quality, developer experience, and product vision. On-demand Steve Jobs persona review evaluating API elegance, error messages, documentation, simplicity, and whether the product deserves to exist. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks for a "jobs review", "jobs style", "steve jobs review", "design review", "DX review", "developer experience review", or wants to know how their API feels, whether the naming is elegant, if the onboarding is smooth, or if the product has taste. Also trigger when reviewing error messages, documentation quality, or anything where the human experience of using the code matters.

Use when the user requests a code review focused on engineering correctness, code quality, and technical rigor. On-demand Linus Torvalds persona review evaluating abstractions, error handling, security, logging/observability, performance, and whether the code is actually good. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks for a "linus review", "linus style", "engineering review", "correctness review", "technical review", deep code quality analysis, or wants to know if their code is actually correct, thread-safe, or maintainable. Also trigger when reviewing error handling, DI patterns, race conditions, or anything where rigorous engineering scrutiny is needed.