Menu
Classify review findings into blocking, non-blocking, or note with consistent merge-risk rules.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Resolve GitHub PR review comments safely, read unresolved comments, validate each issue, make minimal fixes, test, commit, and resolve.
Use zero-install context minimization first, with optional local optimization tooling when available.
Accessibility review for semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard support, focus, screen readers, contrast, and WCAG-oriented issues.
API and contract review for OpenAPI/AsyncAPI/protobuf changes, backwards compatibility, schemas, status codes, and examples.
Architecture review for SOLID, layering, boundaries, coupling, cohesion, extensibility, and maintainability.
Backend review for handlers, services, validation, errors, transactions, dependency boundaries, and service contracts.
| name | severity-classification |
| description | Classify review findings into blocking, non-blocking, or note with consistent merge-risk rules. |
| license | MIT |
blocking means the PR should not merge as-is:
non_blocking means it should be fixed soon but can merge if accepted by owner:
note means useful context, not a requested change.
Do not inflate severity. If uncertain, use non_blocking or omit the finding.
