leadership-succession-testing

name	leadership-succession-testing
description	Use when selecting or vetting a successor for leadership. Applies a multi-phase evaluation combining character tests, progressive responsibility assignment, regency trials, and public acceptance before formalizing succession.

Leadership Succession Testing

A multi-phase evaluation process for potential successors combining practical tests, character assessment, and gradual responsibility transfer.

Overview

This procedure ensures capable leadership succession through comprehensive testing of candidates' character, abilities, and public acceptance before formal transition.

Steps

1. Initial Candidate Identification

   • Consult with senior advisors (Four Peaks)
   • Consider both nobles and commoners
   • Gather information on reputation and character

2. Character Background Check

   • Investigate family circumstances
   • Assess behavior in difficult situations
   • Verify moral conduct (filial piety, harmony)

3. Internal Character Test

   • Marry daughters of the ruler to the candidate
   • Observe treatment of spouse and in-laws
   • Assess humility and proper conduct

4. External Behavior Test

   • Have sons of the ruler associate with candidate
   • Observe influence on peers
   • Assess leadership qualities

5. Progressive Responsibility Assignment

   • Phase 1: Manage the five moral teachings
   • Phase 2: Oversee all officials and administration
   • Phase 3: Host guests from four directions
   • Phase 4: Navigate wilderness in storms (test of composure)

6. Extended Trial Period

   • Allow candidate to serve for multiple years (e.g., 3 years minimum)
   • Evaluate actual achievements
   • Gather feedback from all levels

7. Regency Period

   • Transfer administrative authority
   • Retain title while candidate governs
   • Observe acceptance by heaven and people

8. Final Transition

   • Allow candidate to decline (test of humility)
   • Observe public response
   • Formalize succession only after clear acceptance

Decision Points

• If candidate fails any phase, return to step 1
• If public does not accept candidate, reconsider
• If candidate shows arrogance, disqualify

Expected Outcomes

• Merit-based succession
• Stable leadership transition
• Public trust in new leader
• Avoided succession crises

Validation

• Confirm the candidate has completed all four progressive responsibility phases before entering the regency period
• Verify that feedback was gathered from senior advisors, peers, and the public at each evaluation stage
• Check that the candidate was offered the opportunity to decline, testing humility before formal transition