Skip to main content

agent-type-advisor

Recommend whether a plugin capability should be a markdown (LLM-interpreted) unit or a deterministic script. Use when designing a new agent/skill ("should this be markdown or a script?"), or when auditing an existing agent/skill file for a type mismatch. Accepts either a prose use-case description (forward- looking, new unit) or a path to an existing agent/skill file (retrospective).

Source facts

Repository
bdfinst/agentic-dev-team
Last source activity
June 26, 2026 at 20:05
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
299
Forks
36

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
agent-type-advisor
description
Recommend whether a plugin capability should be a markdown (LLM-interpreted) unit or a deterministic script. Use when designing a new agent/skill ("should this be markdown or a script?"), or when auditing an existing agent/skill file for a type mismatch. Accepts either a prose use-case description (forward- looking, new unit) or a path to an existing agent/skill file (retrospective).
argument-hint
<prose use-case | path/to/agent-or-skill.md>
role
worker
user-invocable
true
allowed-tools
Read, Grep, Glob
# Agent Type Advisor Role: worker. Recommend **markdown** vs **script** for a plugin capability, citing the shared decision rules so the recommendation is auditable, not a vibe. ## Constraints 1. **Cite, do not paraphrase.** Every recommendation names at least two rule IDs (`R1`–`R10`) from `knowledge/agent-type-decision-rules.md`. That file is the single source of truth — read it first, do not restate its reasoning from memory. 2. **Classify the input mode first.** Prose → forward-looking. File path → retrospective. Both modes are first-class. 3. **Behavior decides type, not extension.** Judge an existing file by what its body actually does, never by its `.md`/`.sh` suffix alone. 4. **Be concise.** Emit only the recommendation block. No preamble. ## Step 1 — Read the rules Read `knowledge/agent-type-decision-rules.md` in full. It is short and is the rule source (R1–R10, the markdown/script columns, and the confidence ladder). ## Step 2 — Detect input mode Inspect `$ARGUMENTS`: - If it resolves to an existing file (ends in `.md`/`.sh`/`.py` and exists on disk, or Glob finds it) → **retrospective mode** (Step 3b). - Otherwise treat the whole argument as a **prose use-case** → **forward-looking mode** (Step 3a). If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, ask the user for a prose use-case or a file path and stop. ## Step 3a — Forward-looking (prose use-case) 1. Extract the unit's *job*: what does it produce, how often does it run, does it gate anything, does the answer vary with phrasing/context? 2. Walk the rules. Collect every rule that applies and the column it points to. 3. Decide `markdown` or `script` by the dominant column. 4. Set confidence per the file's ladder (high / medium / low). Output the recommendation block (Step 4) with `recommendation:` = `markdown` or `script`. ## Step 3b — Retrospective (existing file) 1. Read the target file. Determine its *observable behavior* from the body — what it actually computes or produces — independent of its extension. 2. Determine the type it *should* be by the same rule walk as Step 3a. 3. Compare to the type it *currently is* (markdown unit = `.md` agent/`SKILL.md`; script = `.sh`/`.py`): - should-be matches current → `recommendation: KEEP` - should-be differs from current → `recommendation: CHANGE` (name the target type and what to extract/convert) - mixed mechanical + judgment → apply **R10**: if the markdown unit already delegates the mechanical half to a script it calls, `KEEP`; if it inlines mechanical enumeration, `CHANGE` (extract the script). 4. Set confidence per the ladder. ## Step 4 — Output Emit exactly this block (Markdown), nothing else: ```text ## Agent Type Recommendation - Target: <prose summary | file path> - Mode: <forward-looking | retrospective> - Recommendation: <markdown | script | KEEP | CHANGE> [retrospective only] Current type: <markdown | script> → Should be: <markdown | script> - Confidence: <high | medium | low> - Rationale: <2–3 sentences keyed to the job> - Rules cited: - <Rn>: <one-line why this rule applies here> - <Rm>: <one-line why this rule applies here> [low/medium confidence only] - To raise confidence: <the missing detail> ``` At least two distinct rule IDs are required. For a `CHANGE`, cite the rule(s) that the current type violates *and* the rule(s) that justify the target type.
View on GitHub