Menu
Comprehensive code review with multi-agent analysis. Use when: "review", "code review", "check my code", "review PR", "audit code", "is this good", "review changes"
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Full codebase audit: architecture health, dependencies, complexity, tech debt. Use when: "audit", "health check", "codebase analysis", "tech debt", "architecture review", "dependency check", "code quality"
Structured brainstorming with multiple approaches and tradeoffs. Use when: "brainstorm", "explore options", "what are my options", "compare approaches", "pros and cons", "which is better", "how should I", "alternatives"
Build error diagnosis and resolution. Use when: "build failed", "compile error", "bundler error", "fix build", "npm error", "type error", "won't compile"
Scaffold a new application with interactive dialogue. Use when: "create", "build me", "make an app", "new project", "scaffold", "generate app", "start new"
Generate a new custom skill from natural language description. Use when: "create skill", "new skill", "make a skill", "add command", "custom workflow", "skill template", "generate skill"
Systematic debugging with hypothesis-driven investigation. Use when: "debug", "not working", "bug", "broken", "error", "unexpected behavior", "fix issue", "investigate"
| name | review |
| description | Comprehensive code review with multi-agent analysis. Use when: "review", "code review", "check my code", "review PR", "audit code", "is this good", "review changes" |
| argument-hint | [file/dir|pr|security|performance] |
| user-invocable | true |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
$ARGUMENTS
This command performs a structured code review on specified files, directories, or recent changes.
/review - Review all staged/unstaged changes
/review [file/dir] - Review specific file or directory
/review pr - Review current PR changes
/review security - Security-focused review
/review performance - Performance-focused review
When /review is triggered:
Identify scope
git branch --show-currentgit diff --cached --statgit diff --statgit log --oneline -5Multi-agent analysis Invoke relevant agents based on file types:
| File Pattern | Agent | Focus |
|---|---|---|
*.tsx, *.jsx, *.css | frontend-specialist | Component quality, a11y, performance |
*.ts (server), *.py | backend-specialist | API design, security, error handling |
*.test.* | test-engineer | Test quality, coverage gaps |
prisma/*, migrations/* | database-architect | Schema quality, query performance |
Dockerfile, CI/* | devops-engineer | Config quality, security |
| All files | security-auditor | Vulnerabilities, secrets, OWASP |
Synthesize findings
## Code Review Report
### Scope
[Files reviewed, line count]
### Summary
| Severity | Count |
|----------|-------|
| Critical | X |
| Warning | X |
| Info | X |
### Findings
#### Critical
1. **[File:Line]** - [Issue description]
- Why: [Explanation]
- Fix: [Code suggestion]
#### Warnings
1. **[File:Line]** - [Issue description]
- Fix: [Suggestion]
#### Suggestions
1. **[File:Line]** - [Improvement idea]
### Verdict
[APPROVE / REQUEST CHANGES / NEEDS DISCUSSION]
| Dimension | What to Check |
|---|---|
| Correctness | Logic bugs, edge cases, off-by-one |
| Security | Injection, auth gaps, secrets exposure |
| Performance | N+1 queries, unnecessary re-renders, large bundles |
| Maintainability | Naming, complexity, single responsibility |
| Type Safety | Any types, missing generics, unsafe casts |
| Error Handling | Uncaught errors, missing fallbacks |
| Testing | Missing tests for new logic |
/review
/review src/services/auth.ts
/review src/components/
/review security
/review pr