Menu
Use to adversarially attack a plan or argument from the outside. Triggers: "red team this", "attack this plan", "what are the holes", "poke holes".
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Use when the user wants a blunt, no-flattery assessment of an idea, plan, or draft. Triggers: "be brutal", "no flattery", "give me your honest take", "tear this apart".
Use to take a business or product idea from concept to first customers via a guided prompt chain. Triggers: "help me build a business", "turn this idea into an offer", "go from idea to customers".
Convene a five-persona advisory council to adversarially pressure-test a decision and counter Claude's tendency to agree with the user. Use BEFORE any consequential or hard-to-reverse decision — a launch, a hire, a pivot, a big spend, a public commitment, an architecture choice, a contract — or any time the user wants real dissent instead of validation. Trigger phrases: "council this:", "convene the council", "pressure-test this", "stress-test this idea", "give me the hardest truth", "play devil's advocate on this", "what am I missing", "tell me why this is a bad idea". Each advisor critiques from a distinct angle, they anonymously peer-review each other, and a chair delivers a verdict plus the single hardest truth.
Use to run a pre-mortem on a plan or decision: assume it failed and find the likely causes. Triggers: "pre-mortem", "how could this fail", "what would kill this plan".
Use to pressure-test a startup or product idea for fatal flaws, YC-partner style. Triggers: "pressure-test my idea", "is this idea any good", "find the fatal flaws", "would a VC fund this".
| name | redteam |
| description | Use to adversarially attack a plan or argument from the outside. Triggers: "red team this", "attack this plan", "what are the holes", "poke holes". |
Attack the user's plan or argument from the outside. Find the assumptions that, if wrong, break everything. Give the 5 strongest attacks an informed critic would make, ranked by how much damage each does, plus the cheapest test for each. If nothing was provided, ask what to attack.
