impl-select

name	impl-select
disable-model-invocation	true
description	Graduate the winning candidate from the spec-driven `implementations/<version>/<n>-<name>/` tree to the sole implementation at the repo root — a one-way move, only once one candidate has clearly won.
argument-hint	[target]

Impl Select Skill

You are graduating a spec-driven project from multi-implementation exploration to a single committed implementation. This is the graduation phase of a spec-driven workflow. It is a one-way move — re-introducing parallel implementations later is more expensive than living with the indirection a while longer, so confirm the signals before starting.

%%{ init: { 'look': 'handDrawn' } }%%
flowchart TD
    Start(["/sextant:impl-select [target]"]) --> Confirm

    subgraph "Step 1: Confirm signals"
        Confirm["Detect candidate from justfile / CI"] --> Verify{"Single de-facto choice?"}
        Verify -->|No| Stop(["Stop — not ready to graduate"])
        Verify -->|Yes| Inventory
    end

    subgraph "Step 2: Inventory references"
        Inventory["Grep for old implementation paths"] --> ListRefs["List CI / justfile / shims / settings"]
        ListRefs --> ShowPlan["Present plan; ask for sign-off"]
    end

    subgraph "Step 3: Mechanical moves"
        ShowPlan --> Retire["git rm prior implementations"]
        Retire --> Note["Note retirements in HISTORY.md / commit msg"]
        Note --> Move["git mv chosen impl files (incl. its justfile + STATUS.md) to root"]
        Move --> Cleanup["rmdir empty implementations/ tree"]
    end

    subgraph "Step 4: Rewrite references"
        Cleanup --> Rewrite["Update CI working-directory, justfile, bin shims, settings"]
        Rewrite --> FixPaths["Fix any depth-sensitive paths in source (e.g. schema lookups)"]
    end

    subgraph "Step 5: Verify"
        FixPaths --> Build["Build + test from new root"]
        Build --> Install["Smoke-test install path"]
        Install --> Audit["/sextant:spec-sync gate"]
        Audit --> Pass{"All pass?"}
        Pass -->|No| Diagnose["Diagnose; do NOT paper over"]
        Pass -->|Yes| Done(["Graduated"])
    end

    Done --> Recipe["Step 6: Capture graduation friction into the recipe"]

When to Use

• One implementation in implementations/<version>/<n>-<name>/ is the de-facto choice — it's what users install, what CI builds, what the agent integration targets.
• The other implementations are inactive — no commits in weeks, no one referencing them.
• The spec is stable enough to revise in place; you're not actively versioning.
• The implementations/ indirection is now drag, not optionality.

When NOT to Use

• Multiple implementations are still earning their keep (different deployment targets, ongoing comparison).
• The spec is still revealing new gaps when you use the chosen implementation — finish exploration first.
• You're tempted to graduate to "clean things up" but no implementation has actually won. The smell is sunk-cost dressed as housekeeping. Wait.

Behavior

Step 1: Confirm signals

Detect the candidate implementation and confirm it's the right one to select:

1. Detect from justfile — look for impl := "<n>-<name>" or current := "<n>-<name>". That's the active one.
2. Detect from CI — check .github/workflows/*.yml (or .gitlab-ci.yml) for working-directory: implementations/<version>/<n>-<name> or path-scoped cache-dependency-path.
3. Detect from bin/ — any shim referencing an implementation path.
4. Confirm with the user — present what you found and ask: "Select <n>-<name> and flatten it to the root, retire the others?"

If the candidate is ambiguous, ask. Do not guess.

Step 2: Inventory references

Run a global search for the old paths so nothing is missed:

grep -rn "implementations/" --include="*.md" --include="*.sh" --include="*.json" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py" --include="*.yml" --include="*.yaml" --include="justfile" --include="Makefile" .

Build a list of files that reference implementations/. Present the list to the user as "files that will need rewrites" before touching anything.

Step 3: Mechanical moves

In a single coherent commit (or PR):

1. Retire prior implementations — for each non-graduated implementations/<version>/<other>/, run git rm -r. Drop a brief note in implementations/HISTORY.md (or in the commit message) saying what each contributed and why it was retired. Frame the contribution positively — these implementations did their job by surfacing spec problems. Avoid words like "losers" or "failed" — they were instrumented experiments, not competitors.

2. Move the chosen implementation to root — use git mv to preserve history:

   • git mv implementations/<v>/<n>-<name>/{src,package.json,package-lock.json,tsconfig.json,.gitignore,...} <root>
   • Move the candidate's own justfile and STATUS.md too — they become the root justfile and STATUS.md. (The root had none while the tree was multi-candidate; the winner's are now the repo's.) spec-status keeps refreshing the promoted STATUS.md in place afterward.
   • Build artifacts (dist/, node_modules/, etc.) are gitignored — don't git mv them; they'll be regenerated.

3. Delete the empty tree — rmdir implementations/<v>/<n>-<name> implementations/<v> implementations once everything is moved. rmdir (empty-only) is deliberate: if it fails, a file was left behind — move it rather than switching to rm -r.

Step 4: Rewrite references

Touch every file from the inventory:

• CI workflow — drop working-directory: and any cache-dependency-path: subpath; the workflow now runs from the repo root.
• justfile — remove impl (and possibly spec) variables if they only existed to address the indirection; rewrite cd implementations/... recipes to run from root.
• bin/ shims — drop the TS_DIR=... (or equivalent) indirection; build/exec from PLUGIN_ROOT or repo root directly.
• .claude/settings.local.json (or any local allowlist files) — if entries existed only to allow cd implementations/... && npm test-style commands, simplify or delete the file.
• Source code — search for relative paths in source that assumed the old depth (e.g. resolve(__dirname, "../../../..", "schema", ...) calculated from dist/ was correct at depth 4, not at depth 2). Recompute after the move and fix.

Step 5: Verify

Run the full verification chain. Do not paper over a failure — if something breaks, diagnose and fix the root cause; don't add a fallback or skip the broken step.

1. npm install && npm run build && npm test (or stack equivalent) — must pass from the new root.
2. Smoke-test the install path: just install (or the documented install command). Verify the installed binary still works (<cli> --help, <cli> --version, etc.).
3. Run /sextant:spec-sync on the flattened tree. Its coverage analysis should match what it produced before graduation; any regressions are graduation-induced and must be fixed before declaring done.
4. Report the analysis summary back to the user as the final gate.

Step 6: Inform the recipe

If graduation surfaced friction your spec-driven recipe didn't anticipate (e.g. a path that wasn't on the inventory checklist, a CI step that broke in a non-obvious way), capture it as a recipe update before context fades.

What Stays

• spec/<version>/ — keep versioned even after flattening implementations. Spec versioning is independent of implementation count; a future v2 spec gets a sibling, not a rename.
• Schema and other shared assets (schema/, examples/) — these were already at the root, no changes needed.
• Agent skills, hooks, docs — already at the root, no changes needed.

Anti-Patterns

• Guessing the candidate — if the active implementation isn't unambiguous from justfile / CI / bin shims, ask the user. Don't pick the largest or newest implementation by inspection.
• Doing graduation in pieces — half-graduated trees are confusing. Flatten in one commit (or PR), with all references rewritten and verification passing.
• Skipping the audit gate — /sextant:spec-sync is the final check. A graduated tree that doesn't match the spec has drifted during the rewrite.
• Reframing prior implementations as failures — they did their job by surfacing spec problems. Use neutral or positive language ("retired", "exploratory") rather than "losers" or "deprecated."
• Versioning the spec just because you graduated — graduation is about implementation indirection, not spec stability. Only version the spec if there's actually a v2 worth of changes.

Related

• /sextant:spec-sync — invoked as the final gate.
• /sextant:spec-req — useful if the analysis surfaces requirements that were added during exploration but never formalized.