Behavior-driven UI testing patterns across Vitest Browser Mode, Playwright E2E evidence boundaries, and DOM Testing Library. Use when testing any front-end application, writing UI or end-to-end tests, querying DOM elements, simulating user interactions, or choosing the lightest harness that proves a browser-observable claim. For React-specific patterns, see the react-testing skill.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.
The command stays on one line. Scroll horizontally to inspect it before copying.
Prefer a local copy? Download the files currently available to SkillsMP.
File Explorer
5 files
Showing SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
front-end-testing
description
Behavior-driven UI testing patterns across Vitest Browser Mode, Playwright E2E evidence boundaries, and DOM Testing Library. Use when testing any front-end application, writing UI or end-to-end tests, querying DOM elements, simulating user interactions, or choosing the lightest harness that proves a browser-observable claim. For React-specific patterns, see the react-testing skill.
Front-End Testing
For React-specific patterns (components, hooks, context), load the react-testing skill. For TDD workflow, load the tdd skill. For general testing patterns (factories, public-interface testing), load the testing skill.
Deep-dive resources are in the resources/ directory. Load them on demand:
Resource
Load when...
resources/playwright-e2e.md
Writing or auditing Playwright Test E2E/user-journey suites against a running app — who may initiate requests, observing network without performing it, the direct-transport audit, auth/lifecycle evidence
resources/async-patterns.md
Using findBy/waitFor/waitForElementToBeRemoved, testing loading states, debounce, or reviewing waitFor usage
resources/msw.md
Mocking APIs — full setupWorker (Browser Mode) and setupServer (Node/jsdom) setup, per-test overrides
resources/dom-testing-library-legacy.md
Working in a jsdom/@testing-library/dom codebase — screen object, fireEvent vs userEvent, jest-dom matchers, ESLint plugins
Core Philosophy
Test behavior users see, not implementation details. This applies in every environment — Browser Mode, jsdom, anything.
Your UI has two users:
End-users: Interact through the DOM (clicks, typing, reading text)
Developers: You, refactoring implementation
Kent C. Dodds principle: "The more your tests resemble the way your software is used, the more confidence they can give you."
False negatives (tests break on refactor):
// ❌ WRONG - Coupled to state implementation; breaks when state → signals → storesit('should update internal state', () => {
const component = newCounterComponent();
component.setState({ count: 5 });
expect(component.state.count).toBe(5);
});
False positives (bugs pass tests):
// ❌ WRONG - Button exists but onClick is broken; test still passesit('should render button', () => {
render('<button data-testid="submit-btn">Submit</button>');
expect(screen.getByTestId('submit-btn')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
✅ CORRECT - Drive the UI the way a user would, assert what the user sees: type into labelled fields, click the submit button, assert the submit handler received the form data. This survives refactors, tests the contract, and catches real bugs (broken onClick, validation errors).
Vitest Browser Mode for Browser-Observable Behaviour
Prefer Vitest Browser Mode when the claim depends on real rendering, CSS,
events, focus management, accessibility, or browser APIs and the repository
already supports it or the added harness cost is justified. Keep an existing
stable jsdom/happy-dom harness, or use a lighter environment, when it proves
pure logic or component contracts without browser-specific behaviour.
Why Browser Mode Over jsdom
Aspect
jsdom/happy-dom
Browser Mode
Environment
Simulated DOM in Node.js
Real browser (Chromium/Firefox/WebKit)
CSS
Not rendered
Real CSS rendering, layout, computed styles
Events
Synthetic JS events
CDP-based real browser events
APIs
Subset of Web APIs
Full browser API surface
Focus/a11y
Approximate
Real focus management, accessibility tree
Debugging
Console only
Full browser DevTools
Setup
Inspect the repository's package manager, lockfile, existing test harness, and
installed versions before changing dependencies or configuration. If a new
harness is justified and the user has authorized setup, select exact mutually
compatible versions from the official compatibility/peer-dependency evidence,
install them with the repository package manager, and invoke only the
repository-local binaries (no implicit download). For example:
<repo-pm> add --save-dev vitest@<reviewed-version> @vitest/browser-playwright@<reviewed-version>
<repo-pm> exec playwright install chromium # inspect this binary download before authorizing it
If the reviewed installed version provides it, run the local setup wizard with
<repo-pm> exec vitest init browser; inspect its planned config writes first.
Focused Browser-Test Feedback
Apply the tdd skill's fast-feedback policy to browser tests too:
Vitest Browser Mode follows the same repository-owned versus diff-selected strategy, lifecycle, cleanup, native-discovery, and live-proof rules in the tdd skill and its Vitest watch reference. The Node/SSR 4.1.10 clean-start proof does not prove Browser Mode; verify its installed version/configuration independently. Do not assume --changed --watch reloads VCS impact after startup.
Browser dependencies are often outside the import graph. Widen for routing, global styling, browser setup, templates, generated assets, type-only relationships, browser-mode orchestration, and Docker-backed services. Preserve repository watchTriggerPatterns, forceRerunTriggers, and root monorepo project/task graphs.
Playwright Test has a native affected one-shot: prefer the repository script or playwright test --only-changed[=<real-base>] for GREEN/REFACTOR when the installed version supports it. It selects changed test files and tests that import changed files, but Playwright documents this as a heuristic. Browser journeys often exercise application code at runtime rather than importing it, and dynamic/non-import dependencies can remain invisible. For those changes, use the repository-mapped affected journey/project set, including every consumer of shared fixtures, auth state, setup, routing, styling, and UI packages; widen when uncertain.
Use a Playwright file, --grep, --last-failed, or hand-picked project filter only to prove RED or debug a known failure. For GREEN/REFACTOR, project filters are valid only when the runner/workspace graph mechanically derived the complete affected project set, including transitive consumers. Confirm --only-changed actually executes expected tests; an empty selection is not GREEN evidence.
With a one-shot runner, rerun the affected command after creating a test. Never count an empty affected set, Vitest --passWithNoTests, or Playwright --pass-with-no-tests as evidence.
At PR readiness, stop watchers and apply the target repository's mutation policy plus complete non-watch test gate. That gate includes the full required UI matrix across every configured browser/project; targeted Chromium-only, --grep, or UI-only evidence is insufficient.
Built-in Locators
Vitest Browser Mode has built-in locators that mirror Testing Library queries. No separate @testing-library/dom import needed.
import { page } from'vitest/browser'// These work exactly like Testing Library queries
page.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i })
page.getByText(/welcome/i)
page.getByLabelText(/email/i)
page.getByPlaceholder(/search/i)
page.getByAltText(/logo/i)
page.getByTestId('my-element') // Last resort only
Built-in Assertions with Retry
Use expect.element() for DOM assertions — it automatically retries until the assertion passes or times out, reducing flakiness:
In jsdom codebases, use @testing-library/user-event instead — prefer it over
fireEvent for user interactions (see
resources/dom-testing-library-legacy.md). Create a fresh
userEvent.setup() per test by default. An isolated beforeEach is also
valid when it creates a new instance for each non-concurrent test; never reuse
one suite-global user instance.
Multi-Project Setup (Node + Browser)
When you need both unit tests (Node) and UI tests (browser):
vi.spyOn on imports: ES module namespaces are sealed in real browsers. vi.mock('./module', { spy: true }) works, but treat module mocking as temporary scaffolding — prefer parameter injection so the dependency is an explicit seam (load the finding-seams skill).
alert()/confirm(): Thread-blocking dialogs halt browser execution. Mock them with vi.spyOn(window, 'alert').mockImplementation(() => {}).
act(): Not needed for component interactions via locators — CDP events + expect.element() retry handle timing. renderHook state updates still need act (see react-testing).
Playwright / Browser Mode Test Idempotency
All Playwright-style tests MUST be idempotent. Every test must produce the same result regardless of execution order, how many times it runs, or what other tests ran before it.
Rules:
Each test creates its own state from scratch — never depend on another test's side effects
Clean up any persistent state (database rows, localStorage, cookies) created during the test
Use identifiers with enough entropy for parallel runs (for example, crypto.randomUUID()); timestamps alone can collide
Never assume the DOM is in a particular state at the start of a test — render fresh
If tests share a server or database, use isolation strategies (transactions, test-specific data)
// ❌ WRONG - Tests depend on shared stateit('creates a user', async () => {
await page.getByRole('button', { name: /create/i }).click()
// Creates user "Alice" in the database
})
it('lists users', async () => {
// Assumes "Alice" exists from previous test!await expect.element(page.getByText('Alice')).toBeVisible()
})
// ✅ CORRECT - Each test is self-containedit('creates and displays a user', async () => {
const uniqueName = `User-${crypto.randomUUID()}`try {
await page.getByLabelText(/name/i).fill(uniqueName)
await page.getByRole('button', { name: /create/i }).click()
await expect.element(page.getByText(uniqueName)).toBeVisible()
} finally {
await testData.deleteUserByName(uniqueName) // repository-owned idempotent cleanup fixture
}
})
Why this matters: Browser Mode can run tests in parallel across multiple browser instances. Non-idempotent tests will produce flaky failures that are nearly impossible to debug.
Playwright E2E Is a Different Subject
Vitest Browser Mode tests a component in isolation; Playwright Test against a running application tests whatever the test's claim names — a user journey, the frontend's own network behavior, cookie/CSRF posture, redirects, rendering. Same browser engines, different subject and harness: never assume guidance transfers between them.
The one rule that governs E2E suites: a browser or user-journey claim must be proved by a browser initiator — an accessible locator action or a navigation — never by a direct HTTP call standing in for the user or the frontend. page.request.post('/api/...') in a test named "user creates ..." proves an HTTP contract, not a journey; it stays green when the button, cookie policy, CSRF check, redirect, or rendering breaks. Load resources/playwright-e2e.md before writing or reviewing any E2E/journey suite — it carries the decision rule, the evidence-boundary table, safe request observation, the direct-transport audit procedure, and the auth/lifecycle evidence contract.
Query Selection Priority
Most critical skill: choosing the right query. Near-identical for Browser Mode locators and Testing Library queries — the two naming differences are flagged below.
Use queries in this order (accessibility-first):
getByRole - Highest priority. Queries by ARIA role + accessible name; mirrors screen reader experience; forces semantic HTML
getByLabelText - Form fields, via associated <label>
getByPlaceholder - Fallback for inputs when no label (placeholder shouldn't replace a label). Testing Library's name is getByPlaceholderText
getByText - Non-interactive content users read
getByDisplayValue - Inputs with pre-filled values. Testing Library only — Browser Mode has no such locator; use getByRole + a value assertion instead
getByAltText - Images
getByTitle - Rare, when other queries unavailable
getByTestId - Last resort only; not user-facing
Query Variants (Testing Library)
getBy* - Element must exist (throws if not found). Use when asserting existence.
queryBy* - Returns null if not found. Use when asserting non-existence.
findBy* - Async, waits for element to appear. See resources/async-patterns.md.
(Browser Mode locators are lazy and retried by expect.element(), so the get/query/find split mostly disappears — use .not.toBeInTheDocument() via expect.element for absence.)
Common Mistakes
// ❌ WRONG - querySelector (DOM implementation detail)const button = container.querySelector('.submit-button');
// ❌ WRONG - testId when a role is available (not how users find the button)
screen.getByTestId('submit-button');
// ❌ WRONG - role without accessible name (which button? pages have many)
screen.getByRole('button');
// ✅ CORRECT - role + accessible name (how screen readers find it)
screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i });
// ❌ WRONG - getBy to assert non-existence (awkward throw-based check)expect(() => screen.getByText(/error/i)).toThrow();
// ✅ CORRECT - queryBy returns nullexpect(screen.queryByText(/error/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
// Less specific: finds matching text without proving the element's role
screen.getByText(/welcome,\s+john doe/i);
// Preferred when this is a heading: query the accessible role and name
screen.getByRole('heading', { name: /welcome,\s+john doe/i });
Accessibility-First Testing
Three benefits of accessible queries:
Tests mirror real usage - Query like screen readers do
Improves app accessibility - Tests force accessible markup
Refactor-friendly - Coupled to user experience, not implementation
If an accessible query fails, investigate the accessible name and role first. The failure may reveal an accessibility issue, but it can also mean the query or test setup is wrong.
Add ARIA only where semantic HTML is unavailable (e.g., role="dialog" on a custom modal), never redundantly on semantic elements.
Async Testing
In Browser Mode, await expect.element(...) handles most waiting automatically. In jsdom codebases, use findBy* for appearance, waitFor for complex conditions, and waitForElementToBeRemoved for disappearance.
Key rules: no side effects inside waitFor; prefer one assertion per waitFor for clearer failures; never wrap findBy in waitFor.
For full patterns and anti-patterns, see resources/async-patterns.md.
API Mocking with MSW
Use MSW, not fetch/axios mocks — it intercepts at the network level, so the same handlers work in tests, Storybook, and dev.
Environment determines the API:
Browser Mode: setupWorker from msw/browser (start the worker in a setup file; per-test overrides via worker.use())
Node/jsdom: setupServer from msw/node (per-test overrides via server.use())
Using setupServer in Browser Mode silently does nothing — tests run in a real browser. See resources/msw.md for full setup of both.
Core Anti-Patterns
Testing implementation details — internal state, private methods, CSS classes as hooks. Test user-visible behavior.
querySelector/testId when an accessible query exists — see Query Selection Priority above.
beforeEach render with shared variables — use a factory function per test instead:
// ❌ WRONG - Shared state across testslet button;
beforeEach(() => {
render('<button>Submit</button>');
button = screen.getByRole('button');
});
// ✅ CORRECT - Factory function per testconstrenderButton = () => {
render('<button>Submit</button>');
return { button: screen.getByRole('button') };
};
For factory patterns, see the testing skill.
Fetch/axios mocking instead of MSW — see resources/msw.md.
waitFor misuse — see resources/async-patterns.md.
jsdom-specific anti-patterns (skipping screen, fireEvent, redundant cleanup when the harness already provides it, property assertions instead of jest-dom matchers, missing ESLint plugins) — see resources/dom-testing-library-legacy.md.
HTTP-level shortcuts wearing browser names — page.request/page.evaluate(fetch) performing work a "journey"/"browser"/"E2E" test claims the user or frontend did, or forged browser headers (Sec-Fetch-*, Origin) admitting a non-browser client — see resources/playwright-e2e.md.
Summary Checklist
Before merging UI tests, verify:
The harness fits the claim, repository support, and cost: Browser Mode for browser-observable behavior; a stable lighter harness when it proves the contract
All Playwright/Browser Mode tests are idempotent (no shared state between tests)
Using getByRole as first choice for queries (built-in or Testing Library)
Using expect.element() for auto-retrying assertions (Browser Mode)
Using userEvent for interactions (CDP-based in Browser Mode, or @testing-library/user-event)
Testing behavior users see, not implementation details
Cleanup is either verified automatic for this harness or registered once in test setup
No manual act() calls for component interactions (Browser Mode handles timing)
MSW for API mocking — setupWorker in Browser Mode, setupServer in Node/jsdom
Following TDD workflow (see tdd skill)
RED/debug browser runs use the narrowest file/project/grep selection that proves the result
GREEN/REFACTOR browser feedback uses the complete affected scope derived by the runner, workspace orchestrator, or repository mapping; when no reliable graph exists, use the documented owning-suite-plus-known-consumers fallback and widen on uncertainty, never hand-picked test files
Newly created tests join the active watcher, or the affected one-shot reruns after creation; every claimed result executed an expected test
Monorepo runs use the root project/task graph and retain all affected workspace consumers
The complete repository PR test gate passes in non-watch mode against the final tree, including the full required browser/project matrix
Factories are used when repeated or nested data becomes clearer; simple one-off values stay inline (see skill)
More from this repository
testing
In Playwright E2E suites: every browser/journey claim has a browser initiator, and direct HTTP appears only in the narrowly named roles resources/playwright-e2e.md classifies (contract, setup, readiness, post-condition, diagnostic, external actor) — never borrowed as browser evidence
For React-specific patterns (hooks, context, components), see react-testing skill