brand-consistency-checker

name	brand-consistency-checker
description	Synthex brand consistency enforcer. NEVER produce vague feedback ("sounds on-brand", "good feel", "consistent with your voice"). ALWAYS score against specific criteria: vocabulary match percentage, anti-pattern phrase count, and CTA quality. Every feedback item must be specific enough to act on immediately. Activate on ANY request to check brand consistency, audit content against brand guidelines, review voice alignment, or validate that content matches a Business DNA profile.
metadata	{"author":"synthex","version":"1.0","engine":"synthex-ai-agency","type":"capability-uplift-content","triggers":["brand check","on-brand","brand audit","review content","brand consistency","does this match","check my post","quality gate","check brand","voice check","brand alignment"]}
context	fork

Brand Consistency Checker

Purpose

Acts as the brand quality gate for all Synthex content. Scores submitted content against the Business DNA profile across five brand dimensions, flags specific issues, and returns actionable rewrites for any off-brand elements.

This turns Synthex into a brand compliance tool — ensuring every post published through the platform sounds like the brand, not like a generic AI output.

Workflow

1. Receive content to audit (paste, post ID, or scheduled post reference)
2. Load Business DNA for this brand/business
3. Score across 5 brand dimensions
4. Flag specific violations with line-level detail
5. Suggest targeted rewrites for flagged sections
6. Return PASS / CONDITIONAL / FAIL verdict

Brand Scoring Dimensions

Score each dimension 0–100. Overall = weighted average.

1. Tone of Voice (30%)

Compare the content's tone against dna.toneOfVoice and dna.languageStyle.

Check for:

• Formality level match (formal vs casual)
• Energy level (enthusiastic vs measured)
• Perspective (first-person brand voice vs third-person)
• Authenticity (genuine vs generic "AI-sounding" phrases)

Automatic fails (score 0):

• Generic opener: "In today's fast-paced world..."
• Hollow superlatives: "world-class", "cutting-edge", "game-changing" (unless in brand vocabulary)
• Passive voice overuse (>20% of sentences)

2. Vocabulary Compliance (25%)

Check dna.vocabulary (required terms) and dna.avoidWords (forbidden terms).

Required terms present: [count]/[total] ✓/✗
Forbidden terms found: [list any violations]
Industry jargon: appropriate/excessive
Competitor references: none/flagged

3. Message Alignment (20%)

Compare key messages against dna.usp, dna.keyBenefits, and dna.differentiators.

• Does the content reinforce the USP?
• Are key benefits represented?
• Is the target audience (dna.targetAudience) addressed?
• Is the BYOK/value proposition present (if relevant)?

4. Platform Appropriateness (15%)

If platform is known, check against platform rules in platform-content-adaptor skill:

• Length within platform limits
• Hashtag count appropriate
• Format correct (thread vs single, portrait vs landscape reference)
• CTA present and appropriate to platform

5. CTA and Conversion (10%)

• CTA present: yes/no
• CTA matches campaign goal: yes/no/partial
• CTA is specific and actionable (not "learn more" alone)
• Urgency present (if promotional content)

Scoring Thresholds

Score	Verdict	Action
85–100	✅ PASS	Ready to publish
70–84	⚠️ CONDITIONAL	Minor tweaks recommended
50–69	🔶 REVISE	Specific rewrites needed before publishing
0–49	❌ FAIL	Significant brand misalignment — regenerate

Output Format

──────────────────────────────────────────
 BRAND CONSISTENCY AUDIT
 Brand: [name]  |  Platform: [platform]  |  Date: [DD/MM/YYYY]
──────────────────────────────────────────

OVERALL SCORE: 76/100 ⚠️ CONDITIONAL

DIMENSION SCORES
  Tone of Voice:         82/100 ✓
  Vocabulary:            90/100 ✓
  Message Alignment:     65/100 ⚠
  Platform Fit:          80/100 ✓
  CTA & Conversion:      60/100 ⚠

ISSUES FOUND

  [Line 3] "In today's competitive landscape..."
  → OFF-BRAND: Generic opener. Your brand voice is direct and specific.
  → SUGGESTED: "[Brand name] solves [specific problem]..."

  [Line 8] Missing: USP reference. Your USP is "[usp]"
  → Add a line that connects this post back to your core offer.

  No CTA detected.
  → Add: "[Your CTA from Business DNA]"

VERDICT: ⚠️ CONDITIONAL — fix 3 issues then publish.

Integration with Synthex Workflow

• Pre-publish gate: Run this check before approving any AI-generated post
• Batch audit: Check all scheduled posts in a campaign before launch
• Persona training: Patterns from failing posts improve persona prompts over time

Use lib/ai/content-scorer.ts for the Platform Fit and Engagement dimensions. Apply brand dimension scoring via LLM call using the Business DNA as context.

Reference

• Business DNA: .claude/skills/business-dna/
• Content scorer: lib/ai/content-scorer.ts
• Persona system: lib/ai/content-generator.ts (personaId + system prompt)
• Brand profile: app/dashboard/settings/brand-profile

---

Capability Uplift — Override Defaults

NEVER output vague brand feedback: "this sounds on-brand", "good feel", "consistent with your voice", "aligns with your brand values". This feedback is useless — it cannot be acted on. Never approve content that contains anti-pattern phrases from content-standards.md without flagging them.

INSTEAD every consistency check produces a structured score:

BRAND CONSISTENCY REPORT ───────────────────────── Vocabulary match: [X]% — [N] DNA words used, [N] missing from expected set Anti-patterns found: [N] — [list each phrase explicitly] CTA quality: [Pass/Fail] — [exact CTA text] → names action: [Y/N] + benefit: [Y/N] Tone match: [X]/10 — [specific description of what's aligned and what isn't] Overall: [Pass ≥7/10 / Revise <7/10]

Specific fixes:

• Line [N]: Replace "[exact phrase]" → "[suggested replacement]"

REFERENCE .claude/skills/synthex-standards/references/content-standards.md